Bureaucratic competition in EU trade policy: EBA as a case of competing two-level games?

European Union Trade Politics and Development: 'Everything but Arms' Unravelled

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 60-73

  van den Hoven, Adrian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894843257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203934043     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Allison, G. and Zelikow, P. (1962/1999) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York: Longman.
2. Bond (2005) 'Everything but arms: a gesture of EU good faith?', BOND Networking for International Development. http://www.bond.org.uk/eu/pre2002/arms.html.
3. Brenton, P. (2003) 'Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: The Current Impact of EU Preferences under Everything but Arms', Policy Research Working Paper No. 3018, Washington DC: World Bank.
4. Cernat, L., Laird, S., Monge-Roffarello, L. and Turrini, A. (2003) 'The EU's Everything but Arms Initiative and the Least-developed Countries', Discussion Paper No. 2003/47, Wider, United Nations University. HTTP: //www.wider.unu.edu/publications/dps/dps2003/dp2003-047.pdf (accessed 8 May 2006 ).
5. Christiansen, T. (2001) 'Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: towards coherent governance?', Journal of European Public Policy, 8: 747-69.
6. EU (2001) 'EU approves "Everything but Arms" trade access for least developed countries'. Press release, Brussels, 26 February.
7. ICTSD (2001a) 'Everything but Arms initiative under fire from EU farm lobby', ICTSD Bridges Weekly, 5, 1.
8. ICTSD (2001b) 'EU modifies "Everything but Arms" proposal under pressure from AG Sector', ICTSD Bridges Weekly, 5, 3.
9. LDCs (2004) 'Proposal of the Least Developed Countries of the World to the European Union regarding the Adaptation of the EBA Initiative in relation to Sugar and the Role of the LDCs in the Future Orientation of the EU Sugar Regime'. Proposal submitted on 3 March 2004 in response to the EU reform of the GSP regulation.
10. Lequesne, C. (1993) Paris-Bruxelles: comment se fait la politique européenne de la France?, Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale de science politique.
11. Lewis, J. (2000) 'The methods of community in EU decision making and administrative rivalry in the Council's infrastructure', Journal of European Public Policy, 7: 261-89.
12. Meunier, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1999) 'Who speaks for Europe? The delegation of trade authority in the EU', Journal of Common Market Studies, 37: 477-501.
13. Paarlberg, R. (1997) 'Agricultural policy reform and the Uruguay Round: synergistic linkage in a two-level game?', International Organization, 51: 413-44.
14. Patterson, L. A. (1997) 'Agricultural policy reform in the European Community: a three-level game analysis', International Organization, 51: 135-65.
15. Putnam, R. D. (1988) 'Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games', International Organization, 42: 427-60.
16. Stevens, C. and Kennan, J. (2001) The Impact of the EU's 'Everything but Arms' Proposal: a Report to Oxfam, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
17. Vahl, R. (1997) Leadership in Disguise: The Role of the European Commission in EC Decision Making on Agriculture in the Uruguay Round, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
18. Young, A., Holmes, P. and Rollo, J. (2000) 'The European Trade Agenda after Seattle', Sussex European Institute Working Papers Series 37. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.