Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services

Women on Probation and Parole: A Feminist Critique of Community Programs and Services

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-183

  Morash, Merry ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894801481     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (151)

1. Allard, P. 2002. Life sentences: Denying welfare benefits to women convicted of drug offenses. Washington: Sentencing Project.
2. Andrews, D. A., J. Bonta, and R. D. Hoge. 1990. Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior 17: 19-52.
3. Andrews, D. A., and J. J. Kiessling. 1980. Program structure and effective correctional practice: A summary of CaVic research. In Effective correctional treatment, edited by R. Ross and P. Gendreau, 439-63. Toronto: Butterworths.
4. Anglin, M. D., and G. Speckart. 1988. Narcotics use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology 26: 197-233.
5. Arfken, C. L., C. Klein, E. J. Agius, and S. di Menza. 2003. Implementation of selected target cities components: Analysis of matching, case management, and linkages. In Clinical assessment and substance abuse treatment: The target cities experience, edited by R. C. Stephens, C. K. Scott, and R. D. Muck, 103-28. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6. Austin, C. D., and R. W. McLelland. 1994. Case management in human services: Reflections on public policy. Journal of Case Management 6: 119-26.
7. Austin, J., B. Bloom, and T. Donahue. 1992. Female offenders in the community: An analysis of innovative strategies and programs. Washington: National Institute of Corrections.
8. Bates, R. 2001. Improving outcomes for children and families of incarcerated parents. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago, Jane Addams College of Social Work.
9. Belknap, J. 1996. The invisible woman. Belmont, Mass.: Wadsworth.
10. Bertrand, M. A. 1999. Incarceration as a gendering strategy. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 14: 47-59.
11. Biernacki, P. 1986. Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12. Bloom, B., B. Owen, and S. S. Covington. 2004. Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research 21: 31-48.
13. Bloom, B. and M. S. Raeder. 2003. Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington: National Institute of Corrections.
14. Bloom, B., and D. Steinhart. 1993. Why punish the children? A reappraisal of the children of incarcerated mothers in America. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
15. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Boyd, S. C. 1999. Mothers and illicit drugs: Transcending the myths. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17. Boyd, S. C. 2000. Feminist research on mothers and illegal drugs. Resources for Feminist Research 28: 113-32.
18. Brady, T. M., and O. S. Ashley, eds. 2005. Women in substance abuse treatment: Results from the alcohol and drug services study (ADSS). Rockville, Md.: U.S.
19. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/womenTX/womenTX.pdf (accessed October 10, 2009).
20. Briere, J., R. Woo, B. McRae, J. Foltz, and R. Sitzman. 1997. Lifetime victimization history, demographics, and clinical status in female psychiatric emergency room patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 185: 95-101.
21. Buffard, J. A., and F. S. Taxman. 2000. Client gender and the implementation of jail-based therapeutic community programs. Journal of Drug Issues 30: 881-900.
22. Bush-Baskette, S. 2000. The war on drugs and the incarceration of mothers. Journal of Drug Issues 30: 919-28.
23. Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. 1998. Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2005. Adverse childhood experiences study: Major findings. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ACE/findings.htm (accessed October 10, 2009).
25. Chan, M., J. Guydish, R. Prem, M. A. Jessup, A. Cervantes, and A. Bostrom. 2005. Evaluation of probation case management (PCM) for drug-involved women offenders. Crime and Delinquency 51: 447-69.
26. Chesney-Lind, M. 1997. The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
27. Claus, R. E., R. G. Orwin, W. Kissin, A. Krupski, K. Campbell, and K. Stark. 2007. Does gender-specific substance abuse treatment for women promote continuity of care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 32: 27-39.
28. Clear, T. R. 2007. Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Clear, T. R. and P. Hardyman. 1990. The new intensive supervision movement. Crime and Delinquency 36: 42-60.
30. Covington, S. S. 1998. The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions, edited by R. T. Zaplin, 113-31. Gaithersburg, Md.: Aspen.
31. Covington, S. S. 1999. Helping women recover: A program for treating addiction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Covington, S. S. and B. Bloom. 2003. Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders. In Gendered justice: Women in the criminal justice system, edited by B. Bloom, 1-20. Durham, N.C.: Center for Gender and Justice.
33. Covington, S. S., and J. L. Surrey. 1997. The relational model of women's psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In Gender and alcohol: Individual and social perspectives, edited by R. W. Wilsnack and S. C. Wilsnack, 335-51. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University, Center of Alcohol Studies.
34. Daly, K. 1989. Gender and varieties of white-collar crime. Criminology 27: 769-97.
35. Daly, K. 1992. Women's pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies 2: 11-52.
36. Daly, K. 1994. Gender, crime and punishment. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
37. Ditton, P. M. 1999. Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
38. Dvorchak, P. A., G. Grams, L. Tate, and L. A. Jason. 1995. Pregnant and postpartum women in recovery: Barriers to treatment and the role of Oxford House in the continuation of care. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 13: 97-107.
39. Erez, E. 1989. Gender, rehabilitation, and probation decisions. Criminology 27: 307-27.
40. Fagan, J. 1994. Women and drugs revisited: Female participation in the cocaine economy. Journal of Drug Issues 24: 179-225.
41. Farrall, S. 2003. J'accuse: Probation evaluation-research epistemologies. Part two: This time it's personal and social factors. Criminal Justice 3: 249-268.
42. Farrall, S. and B. Bowling. 1999. Structuration, human development, and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology 39: 253-68.
43. Felitti, V. J., R. F. Anda, D. Nordenberg, D. F. Williamson, A. M. Spitz, V. Edwards, M. P. Koss, and J. S. Marks. 1998. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 14: 245-58.
44. Ferrari, J. R., L. A. Jason, R. Nelson, M. Curtin-Davis, P. Marsh, and B. Smith. 1999. An exploratory analysis of women and men within a self-help, communal-living recovery setting: A new beginning in a new house. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 25: 305-17.
45. Festervan, E. 2003. Women probationers: Supervision and success. Lanham, Md.: American Correctional Association.
46. Fetterman, D. M. 1998. Ethnography: Step by step. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
47. Fulton, B., P. Gendreau, and M. A. Paparozzi. 1995. APPA's prototypical intensive supervision program: ISP as it was meant to be. Perspectives 19: 25-41.
48. Gaarder, E., N. Rodriguez, and M. S. Zatz. 2004. Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girls. Justice Quarterly 21: 547-78.
49. Gabel, K., and D. Johnston, eds. 1995. Children of incarcerated parents. New York: Lexington.
50. Gendreau, P., C. Goggin, and B. Fulton. 2001. Intensive supervision in probation and parole. In Handbook of offender assessment and treatment, edited by C. R. Hollin, 195-204. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
51. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
52. Giordano, P. C., S. A. Cernkovich, and D. D. Holland, 2003. Changes in friendship relations over the life course: Implications for desistance from crime. Criminology 41: 293-327.
53. Giordano, P. C., S. A. Cernkovich, and J. L. Rudolph. 2002. Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology 107: 990-1064.
54. Giordano, P. C., S. A. Cernkovich, and R. D. Schroeder. 2007. Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology 112: 1603-61.
55. Glaze, L. E., and T. P. Bonczar. 2007. Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
56. Goode, E. 1997. Between politics and reason: The drug legalization debate. New York: St. Martin's.
57. Granfield, R., and W. Cloud. 1999. Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press.
58. Greenfeld, L. A., and T. L. Snell. 1999. Women offenders. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
59. Greenfield, S. F., A. J. Brooks, S. M. Gordon, C. A. Green, F. Kropp, R. K. McHugh, M. Lincoln, D. Hien, and C. M. Miele. 2007. Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 86: 1-21.
60. Griffin, M. L., and G. S Armstrong. 2003. The effect of local life circumstances on female probationers' offending. Justice Quarterly 20: 213-39.
61. Gutiérrez, L., and E. Lewis. 1999. Empowering women of color. New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Hannah-Moffat, K. 1999. Moral agent or actuarial subject: Risk and Canadian women's imprisonment. Theoretical Criminology 3: 71-94.
63. Holtfreter, K., and M. Morash. 2003. The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women and Criminal Justice 14: 137-160.
64. Horney, J., D. W. Osgood, and I. H. Marshall. 1995. Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review 60: 655-73.
65. Huddleston, C. W., D. B. Marlowe, and R. Casebolt. 2008. Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Washington: National Drug Court Institute.
66. Huebner, B. M. 2007. Racial and ethnic differences in the likelihood of marriage: The effect of incarceration. Justice Quarterly 24: 156-83.
67. Jason, L. A., M. I. Davis, J. R. Ferrari, and P. D. Bishop. 2001. Oxford House: A review of research and implications for substance abuse recovery and community research. Journal of Drug Education 31: 1-27.
68. Jessup, M., L. Edwards, T. Mason, L. Miller, and R. Katz. 2001. Therapeutic jurisprudence: Judicial and corrections panel. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 33: 355-67.
69. Johnson, H. 2004. Drugs and crime: A study of incarcerated female offenders. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
70. Kearney, M. H. 1998. Truthful self-nurturing: A grounded formal theory of women's addiction recovery. Qualitative Health Research 8: 495-512.
71. Kilburn, M. R., and L. A. Karoly. 2008. The economics of early childhood policy: What the dismal science has to say about investing in children. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation.
72. Kleinman, M. A. R., T. H. Tran, P. Fishbein, M. T. Magula, W. Allen, and G. Lacy. 2003. Opportunities and barriers in probation reform: A case study of drug testing and sanctions. Berkeley: California Policy Research Center.
73. Koons, B. A., J. D. Burrow, M. Morash, and T. S. Bynum. 1997. Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime and Delinquency 43: 512-32.
74. Krivo, L. J., and R. D. Peterson. 2000. The structural context of homicide: Accounting for racial differences in process. American Sociological Review 65: 547-59.
75. Krivo, L. J., H. Rizzo, and J. Reynolds. 1998. Race, segregation, and the concentration of disadvantage: 1980-1990. Social Problems 45: 61-80.
76. Ladwig, G. B., and M. D. Andersen. 1989. Substance abuse in women: Relationship between chemical dependency of women and past reports of physical and/or sexual abuse. International Journal of the Addictions 24: 739-754.
77. Lahm, K. F. 2000. Equal or equitable: An exploration of educational and vocational program availability for male and female offenders. Federal Probation 64: 39-46.
78. Langan, N., and B. Pelissier. 2001. Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 13: 291-301.
79. Laub, J. H., D. S. Nagin, and R. J. Sampson. 1998. Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review 63: 225-38.
80. Laub, J. H., and R. J. Sampson. 2001. Understanding desistance from crime. In Crime and justice: A review of research, edited by M. Tonry, 1-69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. Leshner, A. I. 1997. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science 278: 45-47.
82. Link, P., and J. Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 363-85.
83. Lipsey, M. W., N. A. Landenberger, and S. J. Wilson. 2007. Effects of cognitivebehavioral programs for criminal offenders. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
84. Little Hoover Commission. 2004. Breaking the barriers for women on parole. Sacramento, Calif.: Little Hoover Commission. http://www.lhc.ca.gov/studies/177/report177.html, accessed June 15, 2009.
85. Logan, T. K., R. Walker, J. Cole, and C. Leukefel. 2002. Victimization and substance abuse among women: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Review of General Psychiatry 6: 325-97.
86. Longshore, D., S. Turner, and T. Fain. 2005. Effects of case management on parolee misconduct: The Bay Area services network. Criminal Justice and Behavior 32: 205-22.
87. Maher, L. 2000. Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Maruna, S. 2000. Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington: American Psychological Association.
89. Mauer, M., and M. Chesney-Lind, eds. 2002. Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. Washington: Sentencing Project.
90. McKay, J. R., T. R. Franklin, N. Patapis, and K. G. Lynch. 2006. Conceptual, methodological, and analytical issues in the study of relapse. Clinical Psychology Review 26: 109-27.
91. McMahon, M., ed. 2000. Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections. Lexington, Ky.: American Probation and Parole Association.
92. Miller, E. M. 1986. Street woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
93. Monture-Angus, P. 2000. Aboriginal women and correctional practice: Reflections on the task force on federally sentenced women. In An ideal prison? Critical essays on women's imprisonment in Canada, edited by K. Hannah-Moffat and M. Shaw, 52-60. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
94. Moore, L. D., and A. Elkavich. 2008. Who's using and who's doing time. American Journal of Public Health 98: 782-86.
95. Morash, M. 2006. Understanding gender, crime, and justice. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
96. Morash, M., T. S. Bynum, and B. Koons. 1996. Findings from the national study of innovative and promising programs for women offenders. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
97. Morash, M., and A. L. Robinson. 2002. Correctional administrators' perspectives on gender arrangements and family-related programming for women offenders. Marriage and Family Review 32: 83-109.
98. Mullany, J. M. 2002. Special conditions for female probationers: Disparity or discrimination. Justice Professional 15: 169-80.
99. Murphy, S., and P. Sales. 2001. Pregnant drug users: Scapegoats of Reagan/Bush and Clinton-era economics. Social Justice 28: 72-95.
100. National Institute of Justice. 2006. Drug courts: The second decade. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/211081.pdf, accessed October 11, 2009.
101. Needle, R. H., and A. Mills. 1994. Drug procurement practices of the out-oftreatment chronic drug abuser. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
102. Nurco, D. N., T. E. Hanlon, T. W. Kinlock, and K. R. Duszynski. 1988. Differential criminal patterns of narcotic addicts over an addiction career. Criminology 26: 407-23
103. O'Brien, P. 2001. "Just like baking a cake": Women describe the necessary ingredients for successful reentry after incarceration. Families in Society 82: 287-95.
104. O'Brien, P. 2006. Maximizing success for drug-affected women after release from prison: Examining access to and use of social services during reentry. Women and Criminal Justice 17: 95-113.
105. O'Brien, P. and N. J. Harm. 2002. Women's recidivism and reintegration: Two sides of the same coin. In Women at the margins: Neglect, punishment, and resistance, edited by J. Figueira-McDonough and R. C. Sarri, 295-318. New York: Haworth.
106. O'Brien, P., and D. S. Young. 2006. Challenges for formerly incarcerated women: A holistic approach to assessment families in society. Journal of Contemporary Social Services 87: 359-66.
107. Owen, B., and B. Bloom. 1995. Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. Prison Journal 75: 165-85.
108. Paparozzi, M. A., and P. Gendreau. 2005. An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. Prison Journal 85: 445-66.
109. Parsons, M. L., C. Warner-Robbins, and M. Parsons. 2002. Factors that support women's successful transition to the community following jail/prison. Health Care for Women International 23: 6-18.
110. Peele, S. 1985. The meaning of addiction: Compulsive experience and its interpretation. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington.
111. Peters, R. H., A. L. Strozier, M. R. Murrin, and W. D. Kearns. 1997. Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 14: 339-49.
112. Petersilia, J., and S. Turner. 1993. Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice 17: 281-335.
113. Piliavin, I., R. Gartner, and C. Thornton. 1986. Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review 51: 101-19.
114. Prendergast, M. L., J. Wellisch, and G. Falkin. 1995. Assessment of and services for substance abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings. Prison Journal 75: 240-56.
115. Proctor, B. D., and J. Dalaker. 2003. Poverty in the United States: 2002. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
116. Reed, B. G., and M. E. Leavitt. 1998. "Modified wrap around and women offenders: A community corrections continuum." Paper presented at the International Community Corrections Annual Conference, Arlington, Va.
117. Research Triangle International and Urban Institute. 2004. National portrait of SVORI: Serious and violent offender reentry initiative. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Research Triangle International.
118. Richie, B. E. 1996. Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge.
119. Richie, B. E. 2001. Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime and Delinquency 47: 368-89.
120. Rumgay, J. 2004. Living with paradox: Community supervision of women offenders. In Women who offend, edited by G. McIvor, 99-125. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
121. Ruspini, E. 2002. Introduction to longitudinal research. London: Routledge.
122. Sabol, W. J., H. Couture, and P. M. Harrison. 2007. Prisoners in 2006. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.
123. Sampson, R. J., and J. H. Laub. 1993. Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
124. Schaffner, L. 2006. Girls in trouble with the law. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
125. Schram, P. J., B. A. Koons-Witt, F. P. Williams, and M. D. McShane. 2006. Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime and Delinquency 52: 450-71.
126. Schroeder, R. D., P. C. Giordano, and S. A. Cernkovich. 2007. Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology 45: 191-222.
127. Seng, M., and A. J. Lurigio. 2005. Probation officers' views on supervising women probationers. Women and Criminal Justice 16: 65-86.
128. Seymour, C. 1998. Children with parents in prison: Child welfare policy, program, and practice issues. Child Welfare 77: 469-93.
129. Shaw, M. 1996. Is there a feminist future for women's prisons? In Prisons 2000: An international perspective on the current state and future of imprisonment, edited by R. Matthews and P. Francis, 179-200. London: Macmillan.
130. Sherman, F. 2003. Girls in the juvenile justice system: Perspectives on services and conditions of confinement. Boston: Girls' Justice Initiative.
131. Shover, N. 1996. Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
132. Shover, N. and C. Y. Thompson. 1992. Age, differential expectations, and crime desistance. Criminology 30: 89-104.
133. Siefert, K., and S. Pimlott. 2001. Improving pregnancy outcome during imprisonment: A model residential care program. Social Work 46: 125-34.
134. Simpson, S. S., J. L. Yahner, and L. Dugan. 2009. Understanding women's pathways to jail: Analyzing the lives of incarcerated women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 41: 84-108.
135. Skeem, J. L., J. Eno Louden, S. Manchak, S. Vidal, and E. Haddad. 2009. Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems. Law and Human Behavior 33: 122-35.
136. Skeem, J. L., J. Eno Louden, D. Polaschek, and J. Camp. 2007. Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment 19: 397-410.
137. Smart, C., and B. Smart. 1978. Women and social control: An introduction. In Women, sexuality and social control, edited by C. Smart and B. Smart, 1-7. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
138. Steadman, H. J., F. C. Osher, P. C. Robbins, B. Case, and S. Samuels. 2009. Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services 60: 761-65.
139. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2002. Results from the 2001 national household survey on drug abuse. Vol. 1, Summary of National Findings. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k1nhsda/PDF/cover.pdf, accessed October 11, 2009.
140. Uggen, C., and C. Kruttschnitt. 1998. Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law and Society Review 32: 339-66.
141. Uggen, C., and M. Thompson. 2003. The socioeconomic determinants of illgotten gains: Within-person changes in drug use and illegal earnings. American Journal of Sociology 109: 146-85.
142. U.S. Department of Justice. 2008. Prisoners in 2007. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.
143. Veysey, B. M., R. Andersen, L. Lewis, M. Mueller, and V. M. K. Stenius. 2005. Integration of alcohol and other drug, trauma and mental health services: An experiment in rural services integration in Franklin County, MA. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 22: 19-39.
144. Veysey, B. M., J. Heckman, R. Mazelis, L. Markoff, and L. Russell. 2007. It's my time to live: Journeys to healing and recovery. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
145. Vogt, I. 1998. Gender and drug treatment systems. In Drug treatment systems in an international perspective: Drugs, demons, and delinquents, edited by H. Klingemann and G. Hunt, 281-97. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
146. Walitzer, K. S., and R. L. Dearing. 2006. Gender differences in alcohol and substance use relapse. Clinical Psychology Review 26: 128-48.
147. Warr, M. 1998. Life course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology 36: 183-216.
148. Wellisch, J., M. L. Prendergast, and M. D. Anglin. 1994. Drug-abusing women offenders: Results of a national survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.
149. Wu, L. T., and C. Ringwalt. 2005. Use of substance abuse services by young uninsured American adults. Psychiatric Services 56: 946-53.
150. Young, A. M., C. Boyd, and H. Hubbell. 2000. Prostitution, drug use, and coping with psychological distress. Journal of Drug Issues 30: 789-800.
151. Zaplin, R. T. 1998. Female offenders: A systems perspective. In Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions, edited by R. Zaplin, 65-80. Gaithersburg, Md.: Aspen.