Cell Orientation Entropy (COrE): Predicting biochemical recurrence from prostate cancer tissue microarrays

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8151 LNCS, Issue PART 3, 2013, Pages 396-403

  Lee, George ^a   Ali, Sahirzeeshan ^b   Veltri, Robert ^c   Epstein, Jonathan I ^c   Christudass, Christhunesa ^c   Madabhushi, Anant ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS VALIDATION; DIGITAL PATHOLOGIES; FEATURE DESCRIPTORS; LOCAL NEIGHBORHOODS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER; STATISTICAL FEATURES; TISSUE MICROARRAYS;

CYTOLOGY; DECISION TREES; DISEASES; MICROARRAYS; TISSUE; CELLS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ENTROPY; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; UROLOGY;

CELLS; DISEASES;

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; TUMOR MARKER;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BLOOD; CELL POLARITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE MICROARRAY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

CELL POLARITY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICROSCOPY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84894632292     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40760-4_50     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Trock, B., et al.: Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 299(23), 2760-2769 (2008)
2. Han, M., et al.: Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J. Urol. 169(2), 517-523 (2003)
3. Allsbrook Jr., W., et al.: Interobserver reproducibility of gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. Hum. Pathol. 32(1), 81-88 (2001)
4. Christens-Barry, W., Partin, A.: Quantitative grading of tissue and nuclei in prostate cancer for prognosis prediction. Johns Hopkins Apl Technical Digest 18, 226-233 (1997)
5. Tabesh, A., et al.: Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and gleason grading of histological images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 26(10), 1366-1378 (2007)
6. Jafari-Khouzani, K., Soltanian-Zadeh, H.: Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering 50(6), 697-704 (2003)
7. Bilgin, C., et al.: Cell-graph mining for breast tissue modeling and classification. IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Soc., EMBS, 5311-5314 (2007)
8. Veltri, R.W., et al.: Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. The Prostate 70(12), 1333-1339 (2010)
9. Epstein, J.I.: An update of the gleason grading system. Journal Of Urology (the) 183(2), 433 (2010)
10. Haralick, R., et al.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (6), 610-621 (1973)
11. Ali, S., Madabhushi, A.: An integrated region-, boundary-, shape-based active contour for multiple object overlap resolution in histological imagery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 31(7), 1448-1460 (2012)
12. Doyle, S., et al.: Cascaded discrimination of normal, abnormal, and confounder classes in histopathology: Gleason grading of prostate cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 13(1), 282 (2012)