Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 70-78

  Jin, Ying hui ^a   Ma, En ting ^a   Gao, Wei jie ^b   Hua, Wei ^a   Dou, Hao ying ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

^b TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

China; Meta analysis; Nursing; Quality assessment; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CHINA; META ANALYSIS; NURSING PROCESS;

CHINA; NURSING PROCESS;

EID: 84894614983     PISSN: 13227114     EISSN: 1440172X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12123     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cui YY, Wang ZE. Development of the concept of Evidence-Based Nursing. Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi 2012; 42: 26-29.
2. Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: A critical appraisal. Annals of Surgery 2005; 241: 450-459.
3. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J etal. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62: e1-34.
4. Shea B, Bouter LM, Grimshaw JM etal. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. The Journal of Rheumatology 2006; 33: 9-15.
5. Zhao M, Wang H, Zhu L. Writing quality evaluation of papers on systematic reviews on randomized controlled trials published in Domestic Nursing Journals. Journal of Nursing (China) 2011; 18: 8-12.
6. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. The Lancet 1999; 354: 1896-1900.
7. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. The British Journal of Surgery 2000; 7: 1448-1454.
8. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Abbate A etal. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: Case study. British Medical Journal 2006; 332: 202-209.
9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J etal. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. British Medical Journal 2009; 339: b2700.
10. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J etal. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS ONE 2007; 2: e1350.
11. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA etal. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62: 1013-1020.
12. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA etal. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2007; 7: 10.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsVersion 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from URL: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed May 2011.
14. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. British Medical Journal 2006; 333: 597-600.
15. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2011; 39: 91-92.
16. Zhu D, Huang W, Liu L. Evaluation on articles with randomly controlled clinical nursing test in published 'Nursing Research'. Nursing Research 2002; 16: 183-185.
17. Ma B, Guo J, Qi G etal. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e20185.
18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Reprint-preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy 2009; 89: 873-880.