Seeder finder: Identifying additional needles in the Twitter haystack

Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks, LBSN 2013 - Held in Conjunction with the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 44-53

  Gramsky, Nick ^a   Samet, Hanan ^a  

^a Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

Author keywords

big data; information storage and retrieval; social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894611669     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2536689.2536808     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Buzztracker, http://buzztracker.org.
2. Trendsmap, http://trendsmap.com.
3. Pear analytics - twitter study. http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/wp- content/uploads/2010/05/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf, Aug. 2009.
4. A high flying bird: Twitter breaks 140m users, 340m tweets per day. http://www.redherring.com/internet/a-high-flying-bird-twitter-breaks-140m-users- 340m-tweets-per-day/, 2012.
5. E. Amitay, N. Har'El, R. Sivan, and A. Soffer. Web-a-Where: geotagging web content. In SIGIR, pp. 273-280, 2004.
6. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In WSDM, pp. 65-74, 2011.
7. K. R. Canini, B. Suh, and P. L. Pirolli. Finding credible information sources in social networks based on content and social structure. In SocialCom, pp. 1-8, 2011.
8. J. Chen, R. Nairn, L. Nelson, M. Bernstein, and E. Chi. Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In CHI, pp. 1185-1194, 2010.
9. R. Ford. Earthquake: Twitter users learned of tremors seconds before feeling them. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/earthquake-twitter-users- learned-tremors-226481. Pub. Aug. 2011.
10. J. Hannon, M. Bennett, and B. Smyth. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In RecSys, pp. 199-206, 2010.
11. G. R. Hjaltason and H. Samet. Speeding up construction of PMR quadtree-based spatial indexes. VLDBJ, 11(2):109-137, 2002. (Pubitemid 36156208)
12. E. G. Hoel and H. Samet. Benchmarking spatial join operations with spatial output. In VLDB, pp. 606-618, 1995.
13. J. P. Hourcade and N. E. Bullock-Rest. HCI for peace: a call for constructive action. In CHI, pp. 443-452, 2011.
14. A. Jackoway, H. Samet, and J. Sankaranarayanan. Identification of live news events using Twitter. In LBSN, pp. 25-32, 2011.
15. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In KDD, pp. 497-506, 2009.
16. M. D. Lieberman and H. Samet. Multifaceted toponym recognition for streaming news. In SIGIR, pp. 843-852, 2011.
17. M. D. Lieberman and H. Samet. Adaptive context features for toponym resolution in streaming news. In (SIGIR, pp. 731-740, 2012.
18. M. D. Lieberman and H. Samet. Supporting rapid processing and interactive map-based exploration of streaming news. In GIS, pp. 179-188, 2012.
19. M. D. Lieberman, H. Samet, and J. Sankaranarayanan. Geotagging: Using proximity, sibling, and prominence clues to understand comma groups. In GIR, 2010.
20. M. D. Lieberman, H. Samet, and J. Sankaranarayanan. Geotagging with local lexicons to build indexes for textually-specified spatial data. In ICDE, pp. 201-212, 2010.
21. P. Metaxas, E. Mustafaraj, and D. Gayo-Avello. How (not) to predict elections. In SocialCom, pp. 165-171, 2011.
22. G. Mishne and J. Lin. Twanchor text: a preliminary study of the value of tweets as anchor text. In SIGIR, pp. 1159-1160, 2012.
23. E. Pariser. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Read more. Penguin Books Limited, 2011.
24. E. Pariser. Ted talks: Eli pariser: Beware online "filter bubbles". http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/, 2011.
25. G. Quercini, H. Samet, J. Sankaranarayanan, and M. D. Lieberman. Determining the spatial reader scopes of news sources using local lexicons. In GIS, pp. 43-52, 2010.
26. H. Samet. A quadtree medial axis transform. CACM, 26(9):680-693, 1983.
27. H. Samet. K-nearest neighbor finding using MaxNearestDist. IEEE TPAMI, 30(2):243-252, 2008.
28. H. Samet, M. D. Adelfio, B. C. Fruin, M. D. Lieberman, and B. E. Teitler. Porting a web-based mapping application to a smartphone app. In GIS, pp. 525-528, 2011.
29. H. Samet, H. Alborzi, F. Brabec, C. Esperança, G. R. Hjaltason, F. Morgan, and E. Tanin. Use of the SAND spatial browser for digital government applications. CACM, 46(1):63-66, 2003.
30. H. Samet, A. Rosenfeld, C. A. Shaffer, and R. E. Webber. A geographic information system using quadtrees. Pattern Recognition, 17(6):647-656, 1984. (Pubitemid 15453097)
31. H. Samet and M. Tamminen. Bintrees, CSG trees, and time. Computer Graphics, 19(3):121-130, 1985.
32. H. Samet, B. E. Teitler, M. D. Adelfio, and M. D. Lieberman. Adapting a map query interface for a gesturing touch screen interface. In WWW (Companion Volume), pp. 257-260, 2011.
33. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Alborzi, and H. Samet. Efficient query processing on spatial networks. In GIS, pp. 200-209, 2005.
34. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Samet, B. E. Teitler, M. D. Lieberman, and J. Sperling. Twitterstand: news in tweets. In GIS, pp. 42-51, 2009.
35. B. Sun and V. T. Ng. Identifying influential users by their postings in social networks. In MSM, pp. 1-8, 2012.
36. B. Teitler, M. D. Lieberman, D. Panozzo, J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Samet, and J. Sperling. NewsStand: A new view on news. In GIS, pp. 144-153, 2008.
37. J. Vijayan. CIA monitors up to 5 million tweets daily, report says. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9221564/, Nov. 2011.