Visual perception of cluttering in landscapes: Developing a low resolution GIS-evaluation method

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 124, Issue , 2014, Pages 85-92

  Wagtendonk, Alfred J ^a   Vermaat, Jan E ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

GIS; Land use diversity; Land use modelling; Landscape cluttering; Landscape quality; Visual appreciation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; LAND USE;

DISCRIMINATORY POWER; HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE; LAND USE DIVERSITY; LAND USE MODELLING; LANDSCAPE CLUTTERING; LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS; RESIDENTIAL PREMISE; VISUAL APPRECIATIONS;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GIS; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PERCEPTION; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; URBAN AREA; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84894486604     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antrop M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 67:9-26.
2. Antrop M. Perspectieven op het landschap: achtergronden om landschappen te lezen en te begrijpen 2007, Academia Press, Gent, Belgium.
3. Aretano R., Petrosillo I., Zaccarelli N., Semeraro T., Zurlini G. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: A combination of subjective and objective assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 112:63-73.
4. Armstrong M.P. Geography and computational science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1994, 90(1):146-156.
5. Boersma R., Kuiper W.T. Verrommeling in beeld; Kaartbeelden van storende elementen in het Nederlandse landschap 2006, MNP, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
6. Brander L.M., Koetse M.J. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(10):2763-2773.
7. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 2000, 23:160-171.
8. Burchell R.W., Shad N.A., Listokin D., Phillips H., Seskin S., Davis, et al. The costs of sprawl revisited 1998, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, (Transportation Research Board Report 39).
9. Burrough P.A., McDonnell R.A. Principles of geographical information systems 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
10. CBS Productbeschrijving bestand Bodemgebruik 2002, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen, The Netherlands.
11. Coeterier J.F. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 1996, 34:27-44.
12. Costanza R., Maxwell T. Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem. Landscape Ecology 1994, 9:47-57.
13. Council of Europe The European landscape convention 2000, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.
14. CPB, MNP, RPB Welvaart en leefomgeving; een scenariostudie voor Nederland in 2040 2006, CPB, MNP & RPB, Den Haag/Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
15. Daalhuizen F., Van Dam F., Piek M., Sorel N. Plattelandsontwikkeling en de gevolgen voor het landschap 2008, PBL, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
16. De Wit A.J.W. Land use mapping and monitoring in the Netherlands using remote sensing data. Learning from Earth's shapes colors: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium 2003, 2614-2616. volume 4.
17. Fausold C.J., Lilieholm R.J. The economic value of open space: A review and synthesis. Environmental Management 1999, 23(3):307-320.
18. Geoghegan J., Wainger L.A., Bockstael N.E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 1997, 23:251-264.
19. Granö J.G. Reine Geographie. Eine methodologische Studie beleuchtet mit Bespielen aus Finnland und Estland. Acta Geographica 1929, II:2.
20. Gulinck H., Wagendorp T. References for fragmentation analysis of the rural matrix in cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 58:137-146.
21. Henle K., Alard D., Clitherow J., Cobb P., Firbank F., Kull T., et al. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe-A review. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 124:60-71.
22. Hilferink M., Rietveld P. Land Use Scanner: An integrated GIS based model for long term projections of land use in urban and rural areas. Journal of Geographical Systems 1999, 1(2):155-177.
23. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
24. Johnson M.P. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A 2001, 33:717-735.
25. Koomen E., Dekkers J.E.C., Van Dijk T. Open space preservation in the Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:361-377.
26. Koomen E., Rietveld P., De Nijs T. Modelling land-use change for spatial support. The Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42:1-10.
27. Kumar S.V., Peters-Lidard C.D., Tian Y., Houser P.R., Geiger J., Olden S., et al. Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2006, 21:1402-1415.
28. Loonen W., Koomen E., Kuijpers-Linde M. Calibrating and validating the Land Use Scanner algorithms. Paper presented at the 15th European colloquium on theoretical and quantitative geography 2007.
29. Ministry of L.N.V. Nota Landschap 1992, LNV/SDU, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
30. Ministry of V.R.O.M. Nota Ruimte; Ruimte voor Ontwikkeling 2006, LNV/SDU, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
31. Nassauer J.I. The aesthetics of horticulture: Neatness as a form of care. HortScience 1988, 23(6):973-977.
32. Nassauer J.I. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 1995, 14(2):161-170.
33. Nijhuis S., Van Lammeren R., Antrop M. Exploring visual landscapes-Introduction. Research in Urbanism Series 2011, Vol. 2:15-39. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. S. Nijhuis, R. Van Lammeren, F. Van der Hoeven (Eds.).
34. Ode A., Tveit M.S., Fry G. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research 2008, 33:89-117.
35. Riedijk A., Van Wilgenburg R., Koomen E., Borsboom-van Beurden J. Integrated scenarios of socio-economic and climate change; a framework for the 'Climate changes Spatial Planning' programme (Spinlab Research Memorandum SL-06) 2007, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
36. Ritsema van Eck J., Koomen E. Characterising urban concentration and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use. Annals of Regional Science 2007, 42:123-140.
37. Soane I.D., Scolozzi R., Gretter A., Hubacek K. Exploring panarchy in alpine grasslands: An application of adaptive cycle concepts to the conservation of a cultural landscape. Ecology and Society 2012, 17(3):18.
38. US Forest Service Landscape aesthetics: A handbook for scenery management (Agriculture Handbook Number 701) 1995, USDA, Washington, DC.
39. Van den Hurk B., Klein Tank A., Lenderink G., Van Ulden A., Van Oldenborgh G.J., Katsman C., et al. KNMI climate change scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands (KNMI Scientific Report WR 2006-012006) 2006, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands.
40. Van der Wulp N.Y. Storende elementen in het landschap: welke, waar en voor wie? 2009, Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
41. Grasslands in Europe of high nature value 2009, KNNV Publishing, Zeist, The Netherlands. P. Veen, R. Jefferson, J. De Smidt, J. Van der Straaten (Eds.).
42. Veeneklaas F.R., Donders J.L.M., Salverda I.E. Verrommeling in Nederland 2006, Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
43. Wagtendonk A.J., Julião R.P., Schotten C.G.J. A regional planning application of EuroScanner in Portugal. Simulating Europe's Land Use in the Twenty First Century (The GeoJournal Library, Vol. 63) 2001, 257-291. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. J. Stillwell, H.J. Scholten (Eds.).
44. Willis K.G., Garrod G.D. Assessing the value of future landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 1992, 23:17-32.