Simulated landings in turbulence-motion, predictive modelling, and psychometric aspects

Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Svensson, E ^a   Angelborg Thanderz, M ^a  

^a SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894471111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Huddlestone, H. F. & Rolfe, J. S. (1971). Behavioral factors influencing the use of flight simulators for training, Applied Ergonomics, 2, 141-148.
2. Caro, P. W. (1977). Platform motion and simulator training effectiveness, Proceedings of the 10th NTEC/-Industry Conference NAVTRAEQUIPCEN ffl-294. Orlando, Florida.
3. Caro, P. W. (1979). The relationship between flight simulator motion and training requirements, Human Factors, 21, 493-501.
4. Levison, W. H. & Junker, A. M. (1978). A model for the pilot's use of motion cues in steady-state roll-axis tracking tasks, AIAA paper no. 78-1593, Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, a Collection of Technical Papers, American Institute of Aeronautics and Austronautics. Arlington, TX, New York.
5. Puig, J. A, Harris, W. T. & Richard, G. L. (1978). Motion in flight simulation: An annotated bibliography, NAV-TRAEQUrPCEN IH-298, Naval Training Equipment Center, Orlando, Florida.
6. AGARD. (1980). Fidelity of simulation for pilot training, AGARD AR-159, Advisory Group on Aerospace Research and Development, Paris.
7. Rolfe, J. M. & Staples, K. J. (1986). Flight simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Stark, E. A. (1989). Simulation, in Jensen, R S. (ed), Aviation psychology, Gower Technical, Aldershot.
9. Scanlon, C. H. (1987). Effects of motion cues during complex curved approach and landing tasks. A piloted simulation study, NASA Technical Paper 2773, Langley Research Center, USA.
10. Repperberger, D. W. (1995). Biodynamic and spacticity reduction in joystick control via force reflection, Crew Systems Directorate and Biocommunications Division, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
11. Hosman, R. J. A. W. (1997). Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Perception and Control of the Aircraft Motions by the Pilot, AIAA paper 97-3802, Modelling and Simulation Technologies Conference, New Orleans, USA.
12. th International Training & Education Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland.
13. Hosman, R J. A. W., & van der Vaart, J. C. (1981). Effects of vestibular and visual perception on task performance, Acta Psychologica, 47, 271-287.
14. van der Pal, J. (1996). Personal communication.
15. Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderz, M., Sjoberg, L. & Olsson, S. (1997). Information complexity-pilot performance and mental workload in combat aircraft, Ergonomics, 40, 362-380.
16. White, A. D., Hall, I R & Tomlinson, B. N. (1991). Initial validation of an R&D simulator with large amplitude motion, AGARD Conference Proceedings 513, Paris.
17. AGARD. (1995). Flight vehicle integration. Panel vorkshop on pilot induced oscillations, AGARD AR-335, Paris.
18. White, A. D. (1994). Measures of flight simulator fidelity based on pilot control behaviour, Flight Systems Department, Defence Research Agency, Bed-ford, UK.
19. Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderz M., Sjoberg, L. & Gillberg, M. (1988). Military flight experience and sympathoadrenal activity, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 59,411-416.
20. Angelborg-Thanderz, M. (1990). Military flight training at a reasonable price and risk, Economics Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics and FOA report C 50083-5.1, Stockholm, Sweden.
21. Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderz, M. & Sjb'berg, L. (1993a). Mission challenge, mental workload and performance in military aviation, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64, 985-991.
22. Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderz, M. & Sjoberg, L. (1993b). Risk perception in military aviation, Paper prepared for the conference Consequences of Risk Perception, 28-29 September, 1993, Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
23. Ersson, J. (1998). Characteristics of pilot control behaviour in high performance aircraft during simulated landings in turbulence, Bachelor's thesis, University College of Malardalen, Sweden.
24. Svensson, E., Angelborg-Thanderz, M. & Wilson, G. F. (1999). Model of pilot performance for systems and mission evaluation-psychological and psychophysiological aspects, Technical Report, USAF/RL.
25. Cooper, G. E. & Harper, R. Jr. (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluations of aircraft handling qualities, Report No. NASA-TN-D-5153, Moffett Field, CA, Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Center.
26. Schiffrin, S. S., Reynolds, M. L. & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling theory, methods, and applications, Academic Press, New York.
27. Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LJSREL VI. Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelyhood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
28. Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Struc tural Equation Modelling-with the SIMPLJS Command Language, Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Inc. Broadway.