Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 71-76

  Menninghaus, Winfried ^a,b   Bohrn, Isabel C ^b,c   Altmann, Ulrike ^b,c   Lubrich, Oliver ^d   Jacobs, Arthur M ^b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EMPIRICAL AESTHETICS   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c Department of Education and Psychology ^*  (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cognitive fluency; Funniness; Meter; Poetics; Rhyme

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894438597     PISSN: 19313896     EISSN: 1931390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035309     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715-729.
2. Arndt. W. (1982). The genius of Wilhelm Busch. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4, 293-347.
4. Bartolo, A., Benuzzi, F., Nocetti, L., Baraldi, P., & Nichelli, P. (2006). Humor comprehension and appreciation: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1789-1798.
5. Bergson, H. (1911). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. New York, NY: Macmillan.
6. Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language - A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669-2683.
7. Bortfeld, H. (2002). What native and non-native speakers' images for idioms tell us about figurative language. Advances in Psychology, 134, 275-295.
8. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The selfassessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
9. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 118-160.
10. Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 123-137.
11. Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain responses to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74.
12. Dissanayake, E. (2000). Antecedents of the temporal arts in early motherinfant interaction. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 389-410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Falk, D. (2004). Prelinguistic evolution in early hominids: Whence motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 491-503.
14. Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der ästhetik. Leipzig, Germany: Von Breitkopf & Härtel.
15. Forgács, B., Bohrn, I., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M. J., Pleh. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. NeuroImage, 63, 1432-1442.
16. Freud, S. (1960). [1905]. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York, NY: Norton.
17. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1995). Reading skill and suppression revisited. Psychological Science, 6, 165-169.
18. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language. New York, NY: Wiley, 350-377.
19. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
20. Lea, R. B., Rapp, D. N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A. D., & Romine, R. S. (2008). Sweet silent thought -alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension. Psychological Science, 19, 709-716.
21. Long, D. L., & Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11, 35- 60.
22. McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly? Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428.
23. Menninghaus, W. (1991). Dichtung als Tanz - Zu Klopstocks Poetik der Wortbewegung. COMPARATIO. Revue Internationale de Littérature Comparée 2-, 3, 129-150.
24. Mulder, M. P., & Nijholt, A. (2002). Humor research: State of the art. Tech. Rep. No. CTIT-02-34, University of Twente, 1-24.
25. Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 10.
26. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
27. Ruch, W., Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1993). Towards an empirical verification of the general theory of verbal Humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 6. 123-136.
28. Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2008). Entrainment of syntactic processing? ERP-responses to predictable time intervals during syntactic reanalysis. Brain Research, 1226, 144-155.
29. Suls, J. (1976). Cognitive and disparagement theories of humor: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing: Humor (pp. 41-45). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
30. Trehub, S. (2000). Human processing predispositions and musical universals. In N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 427-448). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
31. Trehub, S. E., Schellenberg, E. G., & Kamenetsky, S. B. (1999). Infants' and adults' perception of scale structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 965-975.
32. Unyk, A. M., Trehub, S. E., Trainor, L. J., & Schellenberg, E. G. (1992). Lullabies and simplicity: A cross-cultural perspective. Psychology of Music, 20, 15-28.
33. Van Peer, W. (1990). The measurement of meter: Its cognitive and affective functions. Poetics, 19, 259-275.
34. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Collins, J. E. II. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99, 663-688.