Tinnitus: A cross-sectional study on the audiologic characteristics

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 401-406

  Gilles, Annick ^a,b   Goelen, Stephanie ^a   Van De Heyning, Paul ^a,b  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Audiologic characteristics; Cross sectional; Hearing loss; Hyperacusis; Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS RECRUITMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TINNITUS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; HYPERACUSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TINNITUS;

EID: 84894437093     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000248     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 2004;27:676-82.
2. Axelsson A, Ringdahl A. TinnitusVa study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol 1989;23:53-62.
3. Moller AR. Neural plasticity in tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 2006; 157:365-72.
4. Crummer RW, Hassan GA. Diagnostic approach to tinnitus. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:120-6.
5. Andersson G, Lindvall N, Hursti T, et al. Hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the Internet and post. Int J Audiol 2002;41:545-54.
6. Nelson JJ, Chen K. The relationship of tinnitus, hyperacusis, and hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J 2004;83:472-6.
7. Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:1204-35.
8. Nicolas-Puel C, Akbaraly T, Lloyd R, et al. Characteristics of tinnitus in a population of 555 patients: specificities of tinnitus induced by noise trauma. Int Tinnitus J 2006;12:64-70.
9. Demeester K, van WA, Hendrickx JJ, et al. Audiometric shape and presbycusis. Int J Audiol 2009;48:222-32.
10. Goebel G, Hiller W. [The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire]. HNO 1994;42:166-72.
11. Meeus O, Blaivie C, Van de Heyning P. Validation of the Dutch and the French version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire. B-ENT 2007; 3:11-7.
12. Khalfa S, Dubal S, Veuillet E, et al. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;64:436-42.
13. Meeus OM, Spaepen M, Ridder DD, et al. Correlation between hyperacusis measurements in daily ENT practice. Int J Audiol 2010;49:7-13.
14. Meeus O. New insights in the clinical diagnostic and therapeutic approach of tinnitus. Thesis/Dissertation 2010.
15. Hebert S, Fournier P, Norena A. The auditory sensitivity is increased in tinnitus ears. J Neurosci 2013;33:2356-64.
16. Milerova J, Anders M, Dvorak T, et al. The influence of psychological factors on tinnitus severity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013; 35:412-6.
17. Zeng FG. An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain. Hear Res 2013;295:172-9.
18. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JW. A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications. Br J Audiol 1993;27:7-17.
19. Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990;8:221-54.