Organisation of evidence-based knowledge production: Evidence hierarchies and evidence typologies

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 42, Issue , 2014, Pages 11-17

  Hansen, Hanne Foss ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Evidence hierarchy; evidence movement; evidence typology; evidence use; review practice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EVIDENCE HIERARCHY; EVIDENCE MOVEMENT; EVIDENCE TYPOLOGY; EVIDENCE USE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; LITERATURE; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW PRACTICE; STANDARD;

EVIDENCE HIERARCHY; EVIDENCE MOVEMENT; EVIDENCE TYPOLOGY; EVIDENCE USE; REVIEW PRACTICE;

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84894420923     PISSN: 14034948     EISSN: 16511905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1403494813516715     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Petticrew M. Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide, Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
2. Gough D. Oliver S. Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage, 2012.
3. Pawson R. Evidence-based Policy. A realist perspective. London: Sage, 2006.
4. Thomas G. Introduction: evidence and practice. In: Ed. Thomas G. Pring R. (eds) Evidence-based practice in education. New York: Open University Press, 2004, pp. 1–18.
5. Eraut M. Practice-based evidence. In: Ed. Thomas G. Pring R. (eds) Evidence-based practice in education. New York: Open University Press, 2004, pp. 91–101.
6. Hansen H.F. Rieper O. The evidence movement. The development and consequences of methodologies in review practices. Evaluation 2009;15:141–63.
7. What Works Clearinghouse. Procedures and standards handbook, version 3.0. Washington: WWC. Available at: ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/pdf/reference_resources/WWC_procedures_v3_0_draft_standards_handbook.pdf (2013, accessed July 2013).
8. Clarke A. Evidence-based evaluation in different professional domains: similarities, differences and challenges. In: Ed. Shaw I.F. Greene J.C. Mark M.M. (eds) The Sage handbook of evaluation. London: Sage, 2006.
9. Stevens A. Abrams K. Brazier J. et al. (eds) (2001) Advanced handbook of methods in evidence based healthcare, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2001.
10. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre. EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews. London: EPPI-Centre. Available at: eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=hQBu8y4uVwI%3d&tabid=88&mid=6162 (2007, updated 2010, accessed July 2013).
11. Petticrew M. Roberts H. Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:527–9.
12. Hansen H.F. Rieper O. Institutionalization of second-order evidence-producing organizations. In: Ed. Leeuw F.L. Ling T. Rieper O. (eds) The evidence book. Concepts, generation and use of evidence. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2010, pp. 27–49.
13. Nutley S.M. Walter I. Davies H.T.O. Using evidence. How research can inform public services. London: The Policy Press, 2007.
14. Hatch M.J. Cunliffe A. Organization theory. Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.