Reach and uptake of Internet- and phone-based smoking cessation interventions: Results from a randomized controlled trial

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue , 2014, Pages 38-43

  Skov Ettrup, L S ^a   Dalum, P ^b   Ekholm, O ^a   Tolstrup, J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Internet; Randomized controlled trial; Smoking cessation; Telephone

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE; THERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COUNSELING; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAMPHLETS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELF CARE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894415495     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Balmford J., Borland R., Benda P., Howard S. Factors associated with use of automated smoking cessation interventions: findings from the eQuit study. Health Educ. Res. 2012, 28:288-299.
2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory 1986, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
3. Bock B., Graham A., Sciamanna C., et al. Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: content, quality, and usability. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2004, 6:207-219.
4. Burns E.K., Levinson A.H., Deaton E.A. Factors in nonadherence to quit line services: smoker characteristics explain little. Health Educ. Behav. 2012, 39:596-602.
5. Christensen A.I., Ekholm O., Glumer C., et al. The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics. Scand. J. Public Health 2012, 40:391-397.
6. Clark N.M., Zimmerman B.J. A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning about health. Health Educ. Res. 1990, 5:371-379.
7. Eriksen L., Gronbaek M., Helge J.W., Tolstrup J.S., Curtis T. The Danish Health Examination Survey 2007-2008 (DANHES 2007-2008). Scand. J. Public Health 2011, 39:203-211.
8. Etter J.F., Bergman M.M., Humair J.P., Perneger T.V. Development and validation of a scale measuring self-efficacy of current and former smokers. Addiction 2000, 95:901-913.
9. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005, 7:e11.
10. Gilbert H., Leurent B., Sutton S., Morris R., Alexis-Garsee C., Nazareth I. Factors predicting recruitment to a UK wide primary care smoking cessation study (the ESCAPE trial). Fam. Pract. 2012, 29:110-117.
11. Glasgow R.E., Vogt T.M., Boles S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am. J. Public Health 1999, 89:1322-1327.
12. Graham A.L., Bock B.C., Cobb N.K., Niaura R., Abrams D.B. Characteristics of smokers reached and recruited to an Internet smoking cessation trial: a case of denominators. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2006, 8(Suppl. 1):S43-S48.
13. Green L.W., Ottoson J.M., Garcia C., Hiatt R.A. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2009, 30:151-174.
14. Heatherton T.F., Kozlowski L.T., Frecker R.C., Fagerstrom K.O. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br. J. Addict. 1991, 86:1119-1127.
15. Hiscock R., Judge K., Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation?. J. Public Health (Oxf) 2011, 33:39-47.
16. Kotz D., West R. Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it's not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tob. Control 2009, 18:43-46.
17. Lopez-Campos J.L., Alvarez-Gutierrez F.J., Vellisco A., Medina J.F., Barrot E. Factors predicting the initiation of a tobacco cessation program in Spain. Am. J. Addict. 2011, 20:575-580.
18. Mak Y.W., Loke A.Y., Lam T.H., Abdullah A.S. Predictors of the participation of smoking parents in a proactive telephone-based smoking cessation program. Addict. Behav. 2006, 31:1731-1743.
19. Miller W.R., Rose G.S. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64:527-537.
20. Moore S.M., Charvat J. Promoting health behavior change using appreciative inquiry: moving from deficit models to affirmation models of care. Fam. Community Health 2007, 30:S64-S74.
21. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am. Psychol. 1992, 47:1102-1114.
22. Prochaska J.O., Redding C.A., Evers K.E. The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change. Health Behavior and Health Education 1997, 60-84. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco.
23. Tzelepis F., Paul C.L., Duncan S.L., Walsh R.A., Wiggers J., Knight J. Increasing the reach of quit lines through active telephone recruitment: do cold-called smokers differ from quit line callers?. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2012, 14:1488-1493.
24. Tzelepis F., Paul C.L., Walsh R.A., Knight J., Wiggers J. Who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of quit line support? Comparison of participants versus nonparticipants. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2013, 15:2107-2113.
25. Velicer W.F., Keller S., Friedman R.H., et al. Comparing participants and nonparticipants recruited for an effectiveness study of nicotine replacement therapy. Ann. Behav. Med. 2005, 29:181-191.