Predicate argument structure frames for modeling information in operative notes

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 192, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 783-787

  Wang, Yan ^a   Pakhomov, Serguei ^b   Melton, Genevieve B ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic Health Record; Information Extraction; Operative; Operative note; Predicate Argument Structure; Semantic; Semantic Role Labeling; Surgical Procedures

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA MINING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ARGUMENT STRUCTURES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; OPERATIVE; OPERATIVE NOTES; SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING; SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; DATA MINING; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; SEMANTICS; SURGERY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SEMANTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84894385554     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-783     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, and Chipponi J. Effect of CO2gas warming on pain after laparoscopic surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1110-4.
2. Bordelon B M, Hobday K A, and Hunter J G. Laser vs electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 1993;128:233-6.
3. Dwyer PJ, McGregor JR, McDermott EW, Murphy JJ, and Higgins NJ. Patient recovery following cholecystectomy through a 6 cm or 15 cm transverse subcostal incision: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Postgrad Med J. 1992;68(804): 817-19.
4. Vezakis A, Davides D, Gibson J S, Moore M R, Shah H, Larvin M, and McMahon MJ. Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1999;13:890-3.
5. Simpson MS, Demner-Fushman D. Biomedical Text Mining: A Survey of Recent Progress. In: Mining Text Data. Springer; 2012. pp. 465-517.
6. Wang Y, Pakhomov S, Burkart N, Ryan J, and Melton G. A Study of Actions in Operative Notes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012: 1431-40.
7. Kingsbury P, Palmer M, and Marcus M. Adding Semantic Annotation to the Penn TreeBank. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT02) 2002.
8. Baker CF, Fillmore CJ, and Lowe JB. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL 1998), Volume 1 1998:pp. 86-90.
9. Kipper K, Palmer M, and Rambow O. Extending Prop-Bank with VerbNet Semantic Predicates. Workshop on Applied Interlinguas, held in conjunction with AMTA-2002. 2002.
10. Friedman C, Kra P, and Rzhetsky A. Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of Zellig Harris. J Biomed Inf 2002;35(4):222-35.
11. Zeng QT, Redd D, Divita G, SamahJarad, Brandt C, and Nebeker JR. Characterizing Clinical Text and Sublanguage: A Case Study of the VA Clinical Notes. J Health Med Informat 2011;S3.
12. Zweigenbaum P. Natural Language Processing in the Medical and Biological Domains: a Parallel Perspective. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM 2008), Turku, Finland 2008. pp. 3-4.
13. SPECIALIST Lexicon. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlslex.html .
14. Marcus M, Marcinkiewicz M, and Santorini B. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank. Comput Linguist 1993;19(2):313-30.
15. BIOSMILE: adapting semantic role labeling for biomedical verbs: an exponential model coupled with automatically generated template features. Proceedings of the Workshop on Linking Natural Language Processing and Biology: Towards Deeper Biological Literature Analysis: Association for Computational Linguistics. 2006.