An evaluation framework and a pilot study of a mobile platform for diabetes self-management: Insights from pediatric users

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 192, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 333-337

  Padman, Rema ^a   Jaladi, Sravani ^a   Kim, Sean ^a   Kumar, Saumitra ^a   Orbeta, Philip ^a   Rudolph, Kate ^a   Tran, Tony ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

blood glucose self management; gaming mechanics; mobile applications; Pediatric diabetes; product process program evaluation; social media

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; BLOOD; GLUCOSE; MOBILE COMPUTING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

DEVELOPING NATIONS; DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELF MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

PEDIATRICS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DRUG THERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMAN; MOBILE APPLICATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; SELF CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DRUG THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; SELF CARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION;

EID: 84894368881     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-333     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Aanstoot H-J, Anderson BJ, Daneman D, Danne T, Donaghue K, Kaufman F, Réa RR, Uchigata Y. The Global Burden of Youth Diabetes: Perspectives and Potential. Pediatric Diabetes 2007: 8 (Suppl. 8): 1-44.
2. Fox S. Mobile Health 2010. Pew Internet. http://pewinternet.org/-/media// Files/Reports/2010/PIP-Mobile-Health-2010.pdf.
3. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G. Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(3):e65.
4. Sarkar U, Piette JD, Gonzales R, Lessler D, Chew LD, Reilly B, Johnson J, Brunt M, Huang J, Regenstein M, Schillinger D. Preferences for self-management support: findings from a survey of diabetes patients in safety-net health systems. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(1):102-110.
5. Kyngas H, Rissanen M. Support as a crucial predictor of good compliance of adolescents with a chronic disease. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10(6):767-74.
6. Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Coufal MM, Baumann LC, Mbanya JC, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Sanquanprasit B, Tanasugarn C. Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Affairs. 2012;31(1):130-9.
7. Padman R, Tran T, Rudolph K, Jaladi S, Orbeta P, Kim S, Kumar S. Diabetes Self-Management Mobile Application Evaluation. 2011 Heinz College Working Paper, CMU.
8. Long MH. Process and Product in ESL Program Evaluation. TESOL Quarterly. 1984; 18(3): 409-425.
9. Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, Diamond HS. An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009, 16(2):228-37.