Environmental impact assessment based on dynamic fuzzy simulation

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 235-241

  Wieland, Ralf ^a   Gutzler, Carsten ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamic fuzzy simulation; Environmental impact assessment; Fuzzy modeling; Quick scan

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894368876     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Carvalho J. On the semantics and the use of fuzzy cognitive maps and dynamic cognitive maps in social sciences. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011, 214:6-19.
2. Cash D., Clark W.C., Alcock F., Dickson N.M., Eckley N., Guston D.H., Jaeger J., Mitchell R.B. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100:8086-8091.
3. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) Impact Assessment Guidelines 2009, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, (online). http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/commission_guidelines/commission_guidelines_en.htm.
4. Goldstein D., Gigerenzer G. Fast and frugal forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 2009, 25:760-772.
5. Gutzler C., Balla D., Dannowski R., Deumlich D., Glemnitz M., Helming K., Knierim A., Mirschel W., Starick A., Stachow U., Wieland R., Wurbs A., Zander P. Folgenabschaetzung von Szenarien der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion in Brandenburg 2025: Feldberegnung und Energiemaisanbau 2013, House Publishing, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Muencheberg.
6. Hertin J., Jacob K., Pesch U., Pacchi C. The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment - an empirical analysis,. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11:413-421.
7. Holst N. Auniversal simulator for ecological models. Ecol. Inform. 2013, 13:70-76.
8. Hutchinson J., Gigerenzer G. Simple heuristics and rule of thump: where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behav. Process. 2005, 69:97-124.
9. Kan R., Timmer G.T. Stochastic global optimization methods. Math. Program. 1987, 39:27-78.
10. Kok K. The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Glob. Environ. Change 2009, 19(1):122-133.
11. Langtangen H. APrimer on Scientific Programming with Python 2012, 787. Springer.
12. Le Q., Park S., Vlek P. Land Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): a multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled humanlandscape system: 2. Scenario-based application for impact assessment of land-use policies. Ecol. Inform. 2010, 5(3):203-221.
13. Meadows Do, Meadows De, Randers J., Behrens W. The Limits to Growth 1974, 203. Universe Books.
14. Meadows Do, Meadows De, Randers J. The Limits to Growth: the 30-Year Update 2006, 325. Earthscan Publication.
15. Michener W., Allard S., Budden A., Cook R., Douglass K., Frame M., Kelling St, Koskela R., Tenopir C., Vieglais D. Participatory design of DataONEEnabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecol. Inform. 2012, 11:5-15.
16. Mirschel W., Wieland R., Guddat C., Michel H., Wenkel K.-O. Crop yield estimation on arable land under climate change for the Free State of Thuringia, Germany, using the model YIELDSTAT. Tendencii razvitija agrofiziki v uslovijakh izmenjajushhegosja klimata: k 80-letiju Agrofizicheskogo NII; materialy Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 20-21 sentjabrja 2012 goda 2012, 169-180. GNU AFI Rossel'khozakademii, Sankt-Peterburg, Online. http://www.agrophys.ru/Thesys-collection.
17. Powell M. Direct search algorithms for optimization calculations. Acta Numer. 1998, 7:287-336.
18. Rizzo D., Mouser P., Whitney D., Whitney C., Roger M., Magarey D., Voinov A. The comparison of four dynamic systems-based software packages: translation and sensitivity analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 2006, 21(10):1491-1502.
19. Ross I. APrimer on Pontryagin's Principle in Optimal Control 2009, 80. Collegiate Publishers.
20. Sterman J., Fiddaman T., Franck T., Jones A., McCauley St, Rice P., Sawin E., Siegel L. Management flight simulators to support climate negotiations. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 44:122-135.
21. Thiel A. The use of ex-ante modelling tools in European impact assessment: what role does land use play?. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:1138-1148.
22. Tirelli T., Pessani D. Importance of feature selection in decision-tree and artificial-neural-network ecological applications. Alburnus alburnus alborella: a practical example. Ecol. Inform. 2011, 6(5):309-315.
23. Verweij P., Winograd M., Perez-Soba M., Knapen R., van Randen Y. QUICKScan: a pragmatic approach to decision support. International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Leipzig 2012, http://www.iemss.org/sites/iemss2012/proceedings/E2_0708_Verweij_et_al.pdf.
24. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25(11):1268-1281.
25. Wenkel K.-O., Wieland R., Mirschel W., Schultz A., Kampichler C., Kirilenko A., Voinov A. Chapter sixteen regional models of intermediate complexity (remics) a new direction in integrated landscape modelling. Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment 2008, vol. 3:285-295. Elsevier. A.J. Jakeman, A.A. Voinov, A. Rizzoli, S. Chen (Eds.).
26. Wieland R., Voss M., Holtmann X., Mirschel W., Ajibefun I. Spatial Analysis and Modeling Tool (SAMT): 1. Structure and possibilities. Ecol. Inform. 2006, 1:67-76.
27. Wieland R., Mirschel W., Groth K., Pechenick A., Fukuda K. Anew method for semi-automatic fuzzy training and its application in environmental modeling,. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26(12):1568-1573.
28. Wieland R., Mirschel W., Nendel C., Specka X. Dynamic fuzzy models in agroecosystem modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:44-49.