Growth kinetics of small renal masses: A prospective analysis from the renal cell carcinoma consortium of Canada

Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

Volumn 8, Issue 1-2 FEB, 2014, Pages 24-27

  Organ, Michael ^a   Jewett, Michael ^b   Basiuk, Joan ^c   Morash, Christopher ^d   Pautler, Stephen ^e   Robert Siemens, D ^f   Tanguay, Simon ^g   Gleave, Martin ^h   Drachenberg, Darrell ⁱ   Chow, Raymond ^j   Chin, Joseph ^e   Evans, Andrew ^k   Fleshner, Neil ^b   Gallie, Brenda ^b   Haider, Masoom ^b   Kachura, John ^b   Finelli, Antonio ^b   Rendon, Ricardo A ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^j PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Active surveillance; Growth rate; Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma; Renal mass

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894360194     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1483     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11-30. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21166
2. Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, et al. Renal cell cancer stage migration: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2008;113:78-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23518
3. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, et al. Rising incidence of small renal masses: A need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1331-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj362
4. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009;182:1271-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004
5. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:735-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1470-2045(06)70803-8
6. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:468-71; discussion 472-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077
7. Jewett MAS, Mattar K, Basiuk J, et al. Active surveillance of small renal masses: Progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2011;60:39-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.030
8. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.20006
9. Mason RJ, Abdolell M, Trottier G, et al. Growth kinetics of renal masses: Analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance. Eur Urol 2011;59:863-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2011.02.023
10. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003;170:2217-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000095475.12515.5e
11. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010;58:398-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.032
12. Heuer R, Gill IS, Guazzoni G, et al. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:223-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2009.10.023
13. Snyder ME, Bach A, Kattan MW, et al. Incidence of benign lesions for clinically localized renal masses smaller than 7 cm in radiological diameter: Influence of sex. J Urol 2006;176:2391-5; discussion 2395-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.013
14. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003;169:71-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64038-4
15. Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, et al. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: Metaanalysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 2006;175:425-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5347(05)00148-5
16. Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Boorjian SA, et al. Natural history, growth kinetics, and outcomes of untreated clinically localized renal tumors under active surveillance. Cancer 2009;115:2844-52. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/cncr.24338
17. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986;158:1-10.
18. Abdolell M, LeBlanc M, Stephens D, et al. Binary partitioning for continuous longitudinal data: Categorizing a prognostic variable. Stat Med 2002;21:3395-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1266
19. Segal MR. Extending the elements of tree-structured regression. Stat Methods Med Res 1995;4:219-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096228029500400304
20. Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M, et al. Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 2009;181:2033-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.027
21. Umbreit EC, Shimko MS, Childs MA, et al. Metastatic potential of a renal mass according to original tumour size at presentation. BJU Int 2012;1092:190-4; discussion 194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10184.x
22. Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, et al. Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer 2012;118:997-1006. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/cncr.26369