Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Fanelli, Daniele ^b   Ioannidis, John P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMANS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84894331339     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322565111     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Nuijten MB, van Assen MALM, van Aert RCM, Wicherts JM (2014) Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E712-E713.
2. Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA (2013) US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(37): 15031-15036.