The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 23-33

  Stoutenborough, James W ^a   Vedlitz, Arnold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Knowledge; Public opinion; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894281921     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Arrow K. Risk perception in psychology and economics. Econ. Inq. 1982, 20(1):1-9.
2. Baumgartner F.R., Jones B.J. Agendas and Instability in American Politics 1993, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Bord R.J., O'Connor R.E., Fisher A. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?. Public Understanding Sci. 2000, 9(3):205-218.
4. Boswell C. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Boykoff M.T., Boykoff J.M. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ. Change 2004, 14(2):125-136.
6. Boykoff M.T., Boykoff J.M. Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 2007, 38(6):1190-1204.
7. Buchanan K.S. Contested discourses, knowledge and socio-environmental conflict in Ecuador. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30(2013):19-25.
8. Bulkeley H. Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Understanding Sci. 2000, 9(3):313-330.
9. Burgess J., Harrison C., Filius P. Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environ. Planning A 1998, 30(8):1445-1460.
10. Burstein P. Public opinion, public policy, and democracy. Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective 2010, Springer, New York. K.T. Leicht, J.C. Jenkins (Eds.).
11. Campbell W.K., Goodie A.S., Foster J.D. Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. J. Behav. Decis. Making 2004, 17(4):481-502.
12. Covello V., Sandman P.M. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. Solutions to an Environment in Peril 2001, 164-178. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. A. Wolbarst (Ed.).
13. Darier E., Schüle R. 'Think globally, act locally'?. Climate change and public participation in Manchester and Frankfurt. Local Environ. 1999, 4(3):317-329.
14. Delli Carpini M.X., Keeter S. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters 1996, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
15. Dessai S., Hulme M., Lempert R., Pielke R. Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate?. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2009, 90(13):111-112.
16. Dryzek J.S. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford. second ed.
17. Dunlap R.E. Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context. Int. Soc. 1998, 13(4):473-498.
18. Earle T.C., Siegrist M., Gutscher H. Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation. Trust in Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind 2007, 1-49. Earthscan, London. M. Siegrist, T.C. Earle, H. Gutscher (Eds.).
19. Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1977, 3(4):552-564.
20. Hansen J., Holm L., Frewer L., Robinson P., Sandøe P. Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 2003, 41(2):111-121.
21. Hmelo-Silver C.E. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn?. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 16(3):235-266.
22. Hoffrage U. Overconfidence. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgment, and Memory 2004, 235-254. Psychology Press, Hove, England. R.F. Pohl (Ed.).
23. Hoppe R. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis Praxis 2005, 3(3):199-215.
24. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001 2001, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007 2007, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Iyengar S. Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1987, 81(3):815-832.
27. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
28. Kellstedt P.M., Zahran S., Vedlitz A. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal. 2008, 28(1):113-126.
29. Kempton W. How the public views climate change. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 1997, 39(9):12-21.
30. Krosnick J.A., Boninger D.S., Chuang Y.C., Berent M.K., Carnot C.G. Attitude strength: one construct or many related constructs?. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 1993, 65(6):1132-1151.
31. Kwan V.S.Y., John O.P., Kenny D.A., Bond M.H., Robins R.W. Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: an interpersonal approach. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 111(1):94-110.
32. Liu X., Vedlitz A., Alston L. Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2008, 11(5):379-393.
33. Lowi T. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States 1979, W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
34. Lupia A., McCubbins M.D. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Malka A., Krosnick J.A., Langer G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal. 2009, 29(5):633-647.
36. McCarthy, M., 11 October 2011. Global warming: climate skeptics are winning the battle. The Independent. Available at:[accessed 27.06.13]. http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/global-warning-climate-sceptics-are-winning-the-battle-2368617.html.
37. Miller J.M., Krosnick J.A. News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. Am. J. Political Sci. 2000, 44:301-315.
38. Miller S. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding Sci. 2001, 10(1):115-120.
39. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision 1975, 211-277. McGraw-Hill, New York. P.H. Winston (Ed.).
40. Morgan M.G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., Atman C.J. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
41. Mumpower J.L., Shi L., Stoutenborough J.W., Vedlitz A. Psychometric and demographic predictors of the perceived risk of terrorism threats and the willingness-to-pay for risk management programs. Risk Anal. 2010, forthcoming. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/risa.12033/abstract, 10.1111/risa.12033.
42. Negev M., Teschner N. Rethinking the relationship between technical and local knowledge: toward a multi-type approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30(2013):50-59.
43. O'Connor R.E., Bord R.J., Fisher A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal. 1999, 19(3):461-471.
44. Ostrom V. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration 2007, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. third ed.
45. Page B.I., Shapiro R.Y. Effects of public opinion on policy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1983, 77(1):175-190.
46. Pellizzoni L. The politics of facts: local environmental conflicts and expertise. Environ. Polit. 2011, 20(6):765-785.
47. Pew Research Center, 2011. How people learn about their local community. Pew Research Center, September 2011. Available at:[accessed 27.06.13]. http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/Pew%20Knight%20Local%20News%20Report%20FINAL.pdf.
48. Price V., Tewksbury D. News values and public opinion: a theoretical account of media priming and framing. Progresses in the Communication Sciences 1997, 173-212. Ablex, Greenwich, CT. F.J. Boster, G. Barnett (Eds.).
49. Rosenberg S., Vedlitz A., Cowman D.F., Zahran S. Climate change: a profile of US climate scientists' perspectives. Clim. Change 2010, 101(3-4):311-329.
50. Sabatier P.A., Weible C.A. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. Theories of the Policy Process 2007, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. second ed. P.A. Sabatier (Ed.).
51. Sapolsky H.M. Science, voters, and the fluoridation controversy: conflict among perceived experts leads voters to act negatively on the fluoridation innovation. Science 1968, 162(3852):427-433.
52. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7(5):385-403.
53. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 1942, Harper, New York.
54. Schwedes O., Kettner S., Tiedtke B. E-mobility in Germany: white hope for a sustainable development or fig leaf for particular interests?. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30(2013):72-80.
55. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk 2000, Earthscan, London.
56. Stone D.A. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Maker 2002, Norton and Company, New York. revised ed.
57. Stoutenborough J.W., Vedlitz A. Public opinion and climate-related policy solutions: a comparison of the policy preferences of the public, stakeholders and climate scientists. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 2012.
58. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 1986, 59(4):S251-S278. part 2.
59. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 1992, 5(4):297-323.
60. Waldman S. The Information Needs of Communities: The Changing Media Landscape in a Broadband Age 2011, Federal Communications Commission, Washington D.C.
61. Weick K.E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 1993, 38(4):628-652.
62. Weingart P. Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci. Public Policy 1999, 26(3):151-161.
63. Wesselink A., Buchanan K.S., Georgiadou Y., Turnhout E. Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science-policy interface. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30(2013):1-9.
64. Wesselink A., Hoppe R. If post-normal science is the solution, what is the problem? The politics of activist science. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2011, 36(3):389-412.
65. Wynne B. Knowledges in context. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 1991, 16(1):111-121.
66. Wynne B. Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventative paradigm. Global Environ. Change 1992, 2(2):111-127.
67. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York. A. Irwin, B. Wynne (Eds.).
68. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-hitting the notes, but missing the music. Public Health Genom. 2006, 9(3):211-220.