Gaussian process metamodels for sensitivity analysis of traffic simulation models

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2390, 2013, Pages 87-98

  Ciuffo, Biagio ^a   Casas, Jordi ^c   Montanino, Marcello ^d   Perarnau, Josep ^c   Punzo, Vincenzo ^b  

^a European Commission   (United Kingdom)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c TSS Transport Simulation Systems   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); IMPORTANCE SAMPLING; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; INPUT-OUTPUT; MESOSCOPIC MODELING; META MODEL; MODEL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; PROCESS META MODELS; RANDOM NUMBERS; SAMPLING STRATEGIES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84894267687     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2390-10     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Anres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. Global Sensitivity Analysis-The Primer. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2008.
2. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2004.
3. European Commission. Impact Assessment Guidelines. Technical report 92. SEC. 2009. p. 24. http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key-docs/iag-2009- en.pdf.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Environmental Models. Technical report. Office of the Science Advisor, Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling. EPA/100/K-09/003. p. 26. http://www.epa.gov/crem/library/cred-guidance-0309.pdf.
5. Saltelli, A., and P. Annoni. How to Avoid a Perfunctory Sensitivity Analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1508-1517.
6. Saltelli, A., P. Annoni, I. Azzini, F. Campolongo, M. Ratto, and S. Tarantola. Variance Based Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. Design and Estimator for the Total Sensitivity Index. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 181, No. 2, 2010, pp. 259-270.
7. Storlie, C. B., L. P. Swiler, J. C. Helton, and C. J. Sallaberry. Implementation and Evaluation of Nonparametric Regression Procedures for Sensitivity Analysis of Computationally Demanding Models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94, No. 11, 2009, pp. 1735-1763.
8. Volkova, E., B. Iooss, and F. Van Dorpe. Global Sensitivity Analysis for a Numerical Model of Radionuclide Migration from the RC "Kurchatov Institute" Radwaste Disposal Site. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2008, pp. 17-31.
9. Ciuffo, B. F., V. Punzo, and E. Quaglietta. Kriging Meta-Modeling to Verify Traffic Micro-Simulation Calibration Methods. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
10. Aimsun Dynamic Simulators Users Manual v7. TSS-Transport Simulation Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.
11. Sobol, I. M. Uniformly Distributed Sequences with an Additional Uniform Property. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1976, pp. 236-242.
12. Sobol, I. M. Sensitivity Analysis for Non-Linear Mathematical Models. Mathematical Models and Computational Experiment, Vol. 1, 1993, pp. 407-414.
13. Sobol, I. M. Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and Their Monte Carlo Estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 55, No. 1-3, 2001, pp. 271-280.
14. Punzo, V., and B. F. Ciuffo. Sensitivity Analysis of Car-Following Models: Methodology and Application. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
15. Iooss, B. Numerical Study of the Metamodel Validation Process. Proc., 1st International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, Porto, Portugal, IEEE, New York, 2009, pp. 100-105.
16. Sacks, J., W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1989, pp. 409-435.
17. Santner, T., B. Williams, and W. Notz. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.
18. Marrel, A., B. Iooss, F. Van Dorpe, and E. Volkova. An Efficient Methodology for Modeling Complex Computer Codes with Gaussian Processes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 52, No. 10, 2008, pp. 4731-4744.
19. Kleijnen, J. P. C. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiment. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, Stanford, Calif., 2008.
20. Sobol, I. M. On the Distribution of Points in a Cube and the Approximate Evaluation of Integrals. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1967, pp. 86-112.
21. European Commission-Joint Research Centre. Quasi-Random Sequence Generator by Sobol (up to 51 dimensions in MATLAB and Fortran). http://sensitivity-analysis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/software/index.htm.
22. Gipps, P. G. A Behavioural Car-Following Model for Computer Simulation. Transportation Research B, Vol. 15B, No. 2, 1981, pp. 105-111.
23. Matheron, G. Principles of Geostatistics. Economic Geology, Vol. 58, No. 8, 1963, pp. 1246-1266.
24. Stein, M. L. Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer, New York, 1999.
25. Kleijnen, J. P. C. Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 192, No. 3, 2009, pp. 707-716.
26. Lophanev, S. N., H. B. Nielsen, and J. Sondergaard. DACE: A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0. IMM technical report IMM-REP-2002-12. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2002.
27. Lophanev, S. N., H. B. Nielsen, and J. Sondergaard. Aspects of the Matlab Toolbox DACE. IMM technical report IMM-REP-2002-13. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2002.