Control of Cdc28 CDK1 by a Stress-Induced lncRNA

Molecular Cell

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 549-561

  Nadal Ribelles, Mariona ^a   Solé, Carme ^a   Xu, Zhenyu ^b   Steinmetz, Lars M ^b   deNadal, Eulàlia ^a   Posas, Francesc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; CDC28 PROTEIN KINASE, S CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 8; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; NUCLEOSOMES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES, ANTISENSE; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; RNA, LONG NONCODING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84894265711     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. 1-S network by the stress-activated protein kinase Hog1 upon osmostress. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4:ra63.
2. Alepuz P.M., Jovanovic A., Reiser V., Ammerer G. Stress-induced map kinase Hog1 is part of transcription activation complexes. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:767-777.
3. Alepuz P.M., de Nadal E., Zapater M., Ammerer G., Posas F. Osmostress-induced transcription by Hot1 depends on a Hog1-mediated recruitment of the RNA Pol II. EMBO J. 2003, 22:2433-2442.
4. Ansari A., Hampsey M. A role for the CPF 3'-end processing machinery in RNAP II-dependent gene looping. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:2969-2978.
5. Bloom J., Cross F.R. Multiple levels of cyclin specificity in cell-cycle control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:149-160.
6. Capaldi A.P., Kaplan T., Liu Y., Habib N., Regev A., Friedman N., O'Shea E.K. Structure and function of a transcriptional network activated by the MAPK Hog1. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:1300-1306.
7. Clotet J., Posas F. Control of cell cycle in response to osmostress: lessons from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 428:63-76.
8. Cook K.E., O'Shea E.K. Hog1 controls global reallocation of RNA Pol II upon osmotic shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2:1129-1136.
9. David L., Huber W., Granovskaia M., Toedling J., Palm C.J., Bofkin L., Jones T., Davis R.W., Steinmetz L.M. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:5320-5325.
10. de Nadal E., Posas F. Multilayered control of gene expression by stress-activated protein kinases. EMBO J. 2010, 29:4-13.
11. De Nadal E., Zapater M., Alepuz P.M., Sumoy L., Mas G., Posas F. The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes. Nature 2004, 427:370-374.
12. de Nadal E., Ammerer G., Posas F. Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:833-845.
13. Duch A., de Nadal E., Posas F. The p38 and Hog1 SAPKs control cell cycle progression in response to environmental stresses. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586:2925-2931.
14. Duch A., Felipe-Abrio I., Barroso S., Yaakov G., García-Rubio M., Aguilera A., de Nadal E., Posas F. Coordinated control of replication and transcription by a SAPK protects genomic integrity. Nature 2013, 493:116-119.
15. Escoté X., Zapater M., Clotet J., Posas F. Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:997-1002.
16. Gasch A.P., Spellman P.T., Kao C.M., Carmel-Harel O., Eisen M.B., Storz G., Botstein D., Brown P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:4241-4257.
17. Guttman M., Rinn J.L. Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature 2012, 482:339-346.
18. Hainer S.J., Pruneski J.A., Mitchell R.D., Monteverde R.M., Martens J.A. Intergenic transcription causes repression by directing nucleosome assembly. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:29-40.
19. Hohmann S., Krantz M., Nordlander B. Yeast osmoregulation. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 428:29-45.
20. Houseley J., Rubbi L., Grunstein M., Tollervey D., Vogelauer M. A ncRNA modulates histone modification and mRNA induction in the yeast GAL gene cluster. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:685-695.
21. Jacquier A. The complex eukaryotic transcriptome: unexpected pervasive transcription and novel small RNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:833-844.
22. Kim T., Xu Z., Clauder-Münster S., Steinmetz L.M., Buratowski S. Set3 HDAC mediates effects of overlapping noncoding transcription on gene induction kinetics. Cell 2012, 150:1158-1169.
23. Klopf E., Paskova L., Solé C., Mas G., Petryshyn A., Posas F., Wintersberger U., Ammerer G., Schüller C. Cooperation between the INO80 complex and histone chaperones determines adaptation of stress gene transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29:4994-5007.
24. Kopcewicz K.A., O'Rourke T.W., Reines D. Metabolic regulation of IMD2 transcription and an unusual DNA element that generates short transcripts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:2821-2829.
25. Kuehner J.N., Brow D.A. Regulation of a eukaryotic gene by GTP-dependent start site selection and transcription attenuation. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:201-211.
26. Louvion J.F., Havaux-Copf B., Picard D. Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. Gene 1993, 131:129-134.
27. Loya T.J., O'Rourke T.W., Reines D. A genetic screen for terminator function in yeast identifies a role for a new functional domain in termination factor Nab3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:7476-7491.
28. Margaritis T., Oreal V., Brabers N., Maestroni L., Vitaliano-Prunier A., Benschop J.J., van Hooff S., van Leenen D., Dargemont C., Géli V., Holstege F.C. Two distinct repressive mechanisms for histone 3 lysine 4 methylation through promoting 3'-end antisense transcription. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002952.
29. Martínez-Montañés F., Pascual-Ahuir A., Proft M. Toward a genomic view of the gene expression program regulated by osmostress in yeast. OMICS 2010, 14:619-627.
30. Mas G., de Nadal E., Dechant R., Rodríguez de la Concepción M.L., Logie C., Jimeno-González S., Chávez S., Ammerer G., Posas F. Recruitment of a chromatin remodelling complex by the Hog1 MAP kinase to stress genes. EMBO J. 2009, 28:326-336.
31. Miller C., Schwalb B., Maier K., Schulz D., Dümcke S., Zacher B., Mayer A., Sydow J., Marcinowski L., Dölken L., et al. Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:458.
32. Molin C., Jauhiainen A., Warringer J., Nerman O., Sunnerhagen P. mRNA stability changes precede changes in steady-state mRNA amounts during hyperosmotic stress. RNA 2009, 15:600-614.
33. Nadal-Ribelles M., Conde N., Flores O., González-Vallinas J., Eyras E., Orozco M., de Nadal E., Posas F. Hog1 bypasses stress-mediated down-regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II redistribution and chromatin remodeling. Genome Biol. 2012, 13:R106.
34. O'Sullivan J.M., Tan-Wong S.M., Morillon A., Lee B., Coles J., Mellor J., Proudfoot N.J. Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:1014-1018.
35. Pelet S., Rudolf F., Nadal-Ribelles M., de Nadal E., Posas F., Peter M. Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal gene expression. Science 2011, 332:732-735.
36. Pinskaya M., Gourvennec S., Morillon A. H3 lysine 4 di- and tri-methylation deposited by cryptic transcription attenuates promoter activation. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1697-1707.
37. Pokholok D.K., Zeitlinger J., Hannett N.M., Reynolds D.B., Young R.A. Activated signal transduction kinases frequently occupy target genes. Science 2006, 313:533-536.
38. Posas F., Chambers J.R., Heyman J.A., Hoeffler J.P., de Nadal E., Ariño J. The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J.Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:17249-17255.
39. Proft M., Mas G., de Nadal E., Vendrell A., Noriega N., Struhl K., Posas F. The stress-activated Hog1 kinase is a selective transcriptional elongation factor for genes responding to osmotic stress. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:241-250.
40. Regot S., de Nadal E., Rodríguez-Navarro S., González-Novo A., Pérez-Fernandez J., Gadal O., Seisenbacher G., Ammerer G., Posas F. The Hog1 stress-activated protein kinase targets nucleoporins to control mRNA export upon stress. J.Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:17384-17398.
41. Rhee H.S., Pugh B.F. Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes. Nature 2012, 483:295-301.
42. Romero-Santacreu L., Moreno J., Pérez-Ortín J.E., Alepuz P. Specific and global regulation of mRNA stability during osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 2009, 15:1110-1120.
43. Saito H., Posas F. Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics 2012, 192:289-318.
44. Singh B.N., Hampsey M. A transcription-independent role for TFIIB in gene looping. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:806-816.
45. Solé C., Nadal-Ribelles M., Kraft C., Peter M., Posas F., de Nadal E. Control of Ubp3 ubiquitin protease activity by the Hog1 SAPK modulates transcription upon osmostress. EMBO J. 2011, 30:3274-3284.
46. Spellman P.T., Sherlock G., Zhang M.Q., Iyer V.R., Anders K., Eisen M.B., Brown P.O., Botstein D., Futcher B. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 1998, 9:3273-3297.
47. Tan-Wong S.M., Zaugg J.B., Camblong J., Xu Z., Zhang D.W., Mischo H.E., Ansari A.Z., Luscombe N.M., Steinmetz L.M., Proudfoot N.J. Gene loops enhance transcriptional directionality. Science 2012, 338:671-675.
48. Thiebaut M., Colin J., Neil H., Jacquier A., Séraphin B., Lacroute F., Libri D. Futile cycle of transcription initiation and termination modulates the response to nucleotide shortage in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:671-682.
49. Uhler J.P., Hertel C., Svejstrup J.Q. A role for noncoding transcription in activation of the yeast PHO5 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:8011-8016.
50. van Werven F.J., Neuert G., Hendrick N., Lardenois A., Buratowski S., van Oudenaarden A., Primig M., Amon A. Transcription of two long noncoding RNAs mediates mating-type control of gametogenesis in budding yeast. Cell 2012, 150:1170-1181.
51. Warringer J., Hult M., Regot S., Posas F., Sunnerhagen P. The HOG pathway dictates the short-term translational response after hyperosmotic shock. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:3080-3092.
52. Weake V.M., Workman J.L. Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:426-437.
53. Wei W., Pelechano V., Järvelin A.I., Steinmetz L.M. Functional consequences of bidirectional promoters. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:267-276.
54. Wu J., Delneri D., O'Keefe R.T. Non-coding RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: what is the function?. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40:907-911.
55. Xu Z., Wei W., Gagneur J., Perocchi F., Clauder-Münster S., Camblong J., Guffanti E., Stutz F., Huber W., Steinmetz L.M. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nature 2009, 457:1033-1037.
56. Xu Z., Wei W., Gagneur J., Clauder-Münster S., Smolik M., Huber W., Steinmetz L.M. Antisense expression increases gene expression variability and locus interdependency. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:468.
57. Yadon A.N., Singh B.N., Hampsey M., Tsukiyama T. DNA looping facilitates targeting of a chromatin remodeling enzyme. Mol. Cell 2013, 50:93-103.
58. Zapater M., Sohrmann M., Peter M., Posas F., de Nadal E. Selective requirement for SAGA in Hog1-mediated gene expression depending on the severity of the external osmostress conditions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:3900-3910.