Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 147, Issue , 2014, Pages 2-9

  Mayer, Katja M ^a,b   Di Luca, Massimiliano ^a,c   Ernst, Marc O ^a,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crossmodal intervals; Linear regression model; Perceived duration; Sensory latency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION; TOUCH; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894264448     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allan L.G., Kristoff A.B. Psychophysical theories of duration discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16(1):26-34. 10.3758/Bf03203244.
2. Allison T., Matsumiya Y., Goff G.D., Goff W.R. The scalp topogrphy of human visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1977, 42(2):185-197.
3. Buhusi C.V., Meck W.H. Relativity theory and time perception: single or multiple clocks?. PLoS One 2009, 4(7):e6268. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006268.
4. Church R.M., Broadbent H.A. Alternative representations of time, number, and rate. Cognition 1990, 37(1-2):55.
5. Di Luca M., Machulla T., Ernst M.O. Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: Cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(12:7):1-16.
6. Gamache P.L., Grondin S. Sensory-specific clock components and memory mechanisms: Investigation with parallel timing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 31(10):1908-1914. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07197.x.
7. Grondin S. Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(3):561-582. 10.3758/App.72.3.561.
8. Grondin Simon, Ivry Richard B., Franz E., Perreault L., Metthè L. Markers' influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58(3):424-433.
9. Grondin S., Rousseau R. Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 49(3):245-256.
10. Ivry R.B., Schlerf J.E. Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(7):273-280. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002.
11. Killeen P.R., Taylor T.J. How the propagation of error through stochastic counters affects time discrimination and other psychophysical judgments. Psychological Review 2000, 107(3):430-459. 10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.430.
12. King A.J., Palmer A.R. Integration of visual and auditory information in bimodal neurones in the guinea-pig superior colliculus. Experimental Brain Research 1985, 60(3):492-500.
13. Lapid E., Ulrich R., Rammsayer T. Perceptual learning in auditory temporal discrimination: No evidence for a cross-modal transfer to the visual modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(2):382-389. 10.3758/Pbr.16.2.382.
14. Morein-Zamir S. Auditory capture of vision: Examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17(1):154-163. 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00089-2.
15. Nakajima Y., ten Hoopen G., Sasaki T., Yamamoto K., Kadota M., Simons M., et al. Time-shrinking: The process of unilateral temporal assimilation. Perception 2004, 33(9):1061-1079. 10.1068/p5061.
16. Nakajima Y., ten Hoopen G., van der Wilk R. A new illusion of time perception. Music Perception 1991, 8:431-448.
17. Poliakoff E., Shore D.I., Lowe C., Spence C. Visualtactile temporal order judgments in ageing. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 396(3):207-211.
18. Rousseau R., Poirier J., Lemyre L. Duration discrimination of empty time intervals marked by intermodal pulses. Perception & Psychophysics 1983, 34(6):541-548.
19. Sasaki T., Nakajima Y., ten Hoopen G., van Buuringen E., Massier B., Kojo T., et al. Time stretching: Illusory lengthening of filled auditory durations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(5):1404-1421. 10.3758/APP.72.5.1404.
20. Sasaki T., Suetomi D., Nakajima Y., ten Hoopen G. Time-shrinking, its propagation, and Gestalt principles. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:919-931. 10.3758/Bf03196796.
21. Treisman M. Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the 'internal clock'. Psychological Monographs 1963, 77(1-31).
22. Ulrich R., Nitschke J., Rammsayer T. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemakercounter model. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(7):1140-1152.
23. von Vierordt K. Der Zeitsinn: nach Versuchen 1868, Laupp, Tübingen.
24. Wearden J.H., Edwards H., Fakhri M., Percival A. Why "sounds are judged longer than lights". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. B 1998, 51:25.
25. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1293-1313.
26. Zampini M., Brown T., Shore D., Maravita A., Röder B., Spence C. Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Psychologica 2005, 118:277-291.
27. Zampini M., Guest S., Shore D.I., Spence C. Audio-visual simultaneity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(3):531.