Citizen Preference and Resource Allocation: The Case for Participatory Budgeting in Seoul

Local Government Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 102-120

  Im, Tobin ^a   Lee, Hyunkuk ^b   Cho, Wonhyuk ^a   Campbell, Jesse W ^c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

citizen preference; Korea; participatory budgeting; Seoul

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894236130     PISSN: 03003930     EISSN: 17439388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2013.812963     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947 - 952.
2. Baiocchi, G. 2005. Militants and citizens: the politics of participation in Porto Alegre, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Baiocchi, G. and Lerner, J. 2007. Could participatory budgeting work in the United States?. Good Society Journal, 16 (1): 8 - 13.
4. Barabas, J. 2004. How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98 (4): 687 - 701.
5. Chang, K. 2007. " The end of developmental citizenship? Restructuring and social displacement in post-crisis South Korea ". In Economic and Political Weekly 67 - 72.
6. Cho, S. and Mor Barak, M.E. 2008. Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: a study of organizational commitment and job performance among Korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32 (4): 100 - 126.
7. Coppock, J.T. 1977. " Postscript ". In Public participation in planning, Edited by: Sewell, W.R. Derrick and Coppock, J.T. London: Wiley, 203-208.
8. Crosby, N., Kelly, J.M. and Schaefer, P., 1986. Citizens panels: a new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review46 (2), 170-178.
9. Davis, G. 1996. Consultation, public participation and the integration of multiple interests into policy making, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
10. Day, D., 1997. Citizen participation in the planning process: an essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature11 (3), 421-434.
11. Fisher, R. 1993. " Grass-roots organizing worldwide: common ground, historical roots, and the tension between democracy and the state ". In Mobilizing the community: local politics in the era of the global city, Edited by: Fisher, R. and Kling, J. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 3-27.
12. Franklin, A.L. and Carberry-George, B. 1999. Analyzing how local governments establish service priorities. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19 (3): 31 - 46.
13. Im, T. 2004. Action theory for local organization, Seoul: Pakyongsa.
14. Im, T. 2010. Time and public organizations, Seoul: SNU Press.
15. Irvin, R. and Stansbury, J. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review, 64 (1): 55 - 65.
16. King, C.S., Feltey, K.M. and Susel, B.O. 1998. The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58 (4): 317 - 326.
17. Lee, J.W. 2000. A case study on the budget preparation process in local government system. Korean Public Administration Review, 33 (4): 153 - 168.
18. Lyons, M., Smuts, C. and Stephens, A. 2001. Participation, empowerment and sustainability: (how) do the links work?. Urban Studies, 38 (8): 1233 - 1251.
19. MacNair, R.H., Caldwell, R. and Pollane, L. 1983. Citizen participants in public bureaucracies: foul-weather friends. Administration & Society, 4 (14): 507 - 524.
20. Majone, G. 2008. " Agenda setting ". In The Oxford handbook of public policy, Edited by: Moran, M., Rein, M. and Goodin, R.E. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 228-250.
21. Meier, K.J., and O'Toole Jr, L.J., 2006. Political control versus bureaucratic values: reframing the debate. Public Administration Review66 (2), 177-192.
22. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons, New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and democratic theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Pinnington, E., Lerner, J. and Schugerensky, D. 2009. Participatory budgeting in North America: the case of Guelph, Canada. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 21 (3): 455 - 484.
25. Protasel, G.J. 1988. Abandonments of the council-manager plan: a new institutional perspective. Public Administration Review, 48 (4): 807 - 812.
26. Smith, P.D. and McDonough, M.H. 2001. Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources, 14 (3): 239 - 249.
27. Song, H. 2002. Prospects and limitations of the e-government initiative in Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 7 (2): 45 - 53.
28. United Nations, 2010. World population prospects: the 2010 revision [online]. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2011. Available from:. http://data.un.org (http://data.un.org)
29. Waldo, D., 1948. The administrative stateNew York: Ronald Press.