Asymmetries in visuomotor recalibration of time perception: Does causal binding distort the window of integration?

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 147, Issue , 2014, Pages 127-135

  Rohde, Marieke ^a   Greiner, Leonie ^a   Ernst, Marc O ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

2300 Human Experimental Psychology; 2323 Visual Perception; 2330 Motor Processes; Intentional binding; Multimodal perception; Temporal recalibration; Time perception; Visuomotor integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894229435     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allan L.G. The relationship between judgments of successiveness. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 18(1):29-36.
2. Bresciani J.-P., Ernst M.O., Drewing K., Bouyer G., Maury V., Kheddar A. Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile taps perception. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 162(2):172-180.
3. Buehner M.J., Humphreys G.R. Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1221-1228.
4. Cai M., Stetson C., Eagleman D.M. A neural model for temporal order judgments and their active recalibration: a common mechanism for space and time?. Frontiers in Perception Science 2012, 3:470.
5. Cravo A.M., Claessens P.M.E., Baldo M.V.C. The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding. Acta Psychologica 2011, 136(1):157-166.
6. Di Luca M., Machulla T.-K., Ernst M.O. Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-16.
7. Eagleman D.M., Holcombe A.O. Causality and the perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Science 2002, 323-325.
8. Ernst M.O., Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(4):162-169.
9. Fujisaki W., Shimojo S., Kashino M., Nishida S. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:773-778.
10. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:382-385.
11. Heron J., Hanson J.V.M., Whitaker D. Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7681.
12. Hillis J.M., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S., Landy M.S. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 2002, 298:1627-1630.
13. Humphreys G.R., Buehner M.J. Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(5):1542-1549.
14. Keetels M., Vroomen J. Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 430:130-134.
15. Keetels M., Vroomen J. Exposure to delayed visual feedback of the hand changes motor-sensory synchrony perception. Experimental Brain Research 2012, 219:431-440.
16. Kleiner M., Brainard D., Pelli D. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3?. Perception 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement 2007.
17. Moore J.W., Wegner D.M., Haggard P. Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(4):1056-1064.
18. Poulton E.C. Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86(4):777.
19. Roach N.W., Heron J., Whitaker D., McGraw P.V. Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278:1314-1322.
20. Rohde M., Ernst M.O. To lead and to lag-forward and backward recalibration of perceived visuomotor simultaneity. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 3:599.
21. Rohde M., Scheller M., Ernst M.O. Temporal constraints on intentional binding and the perception of causality. Perception 2012, 47.
22. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Shimojo S. What you see is what you hear. Nature 2000, 408:788.
23. Stetson C., Cui X., Montague P.R., Eagleman D.M. Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 2006, 51:651-659.
24. Sugano Y., Keetels M., Vroomen J. Adaptation to motor-visual and motor-auditory temporal lags transfer across modalities. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:393-399.
25. Sugano Y., Keetels M., Vroomen J. The build-up and transfer of sensorimotor temporal recalibration measured via a synchronization task. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:246.
26. Ulrich R. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 42(3):224-239.
27. Vroomen J., Keetels M. Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72(4):871-884.
28. Welch R.B., Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 88(3):638-667.
29. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1293-1313.
30. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1314-1329.
31. Yarrow K., Jahn N., Durant S., Arnold D.H. Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:1518-1531.