Vertical bone augmentation using different osteoconductive scaffolds combined with barrier domes in the rat calvarium

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 138-144

  Zigdon, Hadar ^a,b,c   Lewinson, Dina ^b   Bick, Tova ^b   Machtei, Eli E ^a,c,d  

^a Endodontics and Dental Trauma Unit   (Israel)

^b Orthopaedic Surgery A   (Israel)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Guided bone regeneration (GBR); Osteoconductive scaffolds; Vertical bone augmentation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; ORAL SURGERY; RAT; SKULL; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; MODELS, ANIMAL; RATS; SKULL; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84894227920     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00452.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Irinakis T. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72:917-922.
2. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 (Suppl 2):136-159. Review.
3. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Herten M, etal. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:243-250.
4. Nyman S, Gottlow J, Karring T, Lindhe J. The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey. J Clin Periodontol 1982; 9:257-265.
5. Polimeni G, Albandar JM, Wikesjö UM. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of space provision. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:951-954.
6. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:696-710.
7. Verna C, Dalstra M, Wikesjö UM, Trombelli L, Bosch C. Healing patterns in calvarial bone defects following guided bone regeneration in rats. A micro-CT scan analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29:865-870.
8. Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Nyman S. Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:67-72.
9. Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schenk RK, etal. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18:321-331.
10. Mellonig JT. Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived bone xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:19-29.
11. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P, Marinello CP, Schüpbach P, Berglundh T. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: a histologic study in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21:288-295.
12. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets: 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodontol 2001; 72:152-159.
13. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:835-840.
14. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hämmerle C. Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:59-64.
15. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:433-440.
16. Rojbani H, Nyan M, Ohya K, Kasugai S. Evaluation of the osteoconductivity of α-tricalcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite combined with or without simvastatin in rat calvarial defect. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 98:488-498.
17. Atesok K, Li R, Stewart DJ, Schemitsch EH. Endothelial progenitor cells promote fracture healing in a segmental bone defect model. J Orthop Res 2010; 28:1007-1014.
18. Kaigler D, Pagni G, Park CH, Tarle SA, Bartel RL, Giannobile WV. Angiogenic and osteogenic potential of bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16:2809-2820.
19. Brkovic BM, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD, etal. Beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen cones with or without a barrier membrane in human extraction socket healing: clinical, histologic, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Okazaki K, Shimizu Y, Xu H, Ooya K. Blood-filled spaces with and without deproteinized bone grafts in guided bone regeneration. A histomorphometric study of the rabbit skull using nonresorbable membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:236-243.
21. Martinez A, Franco J, Saiz E, Guitian F. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2010; 30:763-769.
22. Seebach C, Schultheiss J, Wilhelm K, Frank J, Henrich D. Comparison of six bone-graft substitutes regarding to cell seeding efficiency, metabolism and growth behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in vitro. Injury 2010; 41:731-738. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
23. Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:961-970.
24. Mangano C, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:980-986.
25. Araújo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:55-64.
26. Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:75-82.
27. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D. The role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration: a literature review. J Periodontol 2009; 80:175-189.
28. Min S, Sato S, Murai M, etal. Effects of marrow penetration on bone augmentation within a titanium cap in rabbit calvarium. J Periodontol 2007; 78:1978-1984.
29. Majzoub Z, Berengo M, Giardino R, Aldini NN, Cordioli G. Role of intramarrow penetration in osseous repair: a pilot study in the rabbit calvaria. J Periodontol 1999; 70:1501-1510.
30. Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Hämmerle CH, Nyman S, Sennerby L. Influence of decortication of the donor bone on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit skull bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:99-106.
31. Ben-David D, Kizhner TA, Kohler T, Müller R, Livne E, Srouji S. Cell-scaffold transplant of hydrogel seeded with rat bone marrow progenitors for bone regeneration. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39:364-371. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
32. Seebach C, Henrich D, Kähling C, etal. Endothelial progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells seeded onto beta-TCP granules enhance early vascularization and bone healing in a critical-sized bone defect in rats. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16:1961-1970.