Multi-scale geospatial agroecosystem modeling: A case study on the influence of soil data resolution on carbon budget estimates

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 479-480, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 138-150

  Zhang, Xuesong ^a   Sahajpal, Ritvik ^a   Manowitz, David H ^a   Zhao, Kaiguang ^b   LeDuc, Stephen D ^c   Xu, Min ^a   Xiong, Wei ^d   Zhang, Aiping ^d   Izaurralde, Roberto C ^a   Thomson, Allison M ^a   West, Tristram O ^a   Post, Wilfred M ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^e OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; EPIC; Net Ecosystem Production; Parallel computing; Spatial resolution; SSURGO; STATSGO

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; CARBON; CLIMATE MODELS; CROPS; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SCALES (WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS); SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EPIC; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SSURGO; STATSGO;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE;

AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; CARBON BUDGET; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION; PARALLEL COMPUTING; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATED CLIMATE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MODEL; MULTI SCALE GEOSPATIAL AGROECOSYSTEM MODELING; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC DATABASE; STATE SOIL GEOGRAPHIC DATABASE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; EPIC; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION; PARALLEL COMPUTING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SSURGO; STATSGO;

CARBON; CARBON CYCLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOIL;

EID: 84894225477     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.099     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allmaras R.R., Schomberg H.H., Douglas C.L., Dao T.H. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of adopting conservation tillage in U.S. croplands. J Soil Water Conserv 2000, 55:365-373.
2. Apezteguía H.P., Izaurralde R.C., Sereno R. Simulation study of soil organic matter dynamics as affected by land use and agricultural practices in semiarid Córdoba, Argentina. Soil Tillage Res 2009, 102:101-108.
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Allen P.M. Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 1999, 35(5):1037-1051.
4. Buell G.R., Markewich H.W. Data compilation, synthesis, and calculations used for organic-carbon storage and inventory estimates for mineral soils of the Mississippi River Basin. USGS Professional Paper 1686-A 2004, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, WI.
5. Causarano H.J., Shaw J.N., Franzluebbers A.J., Reeves D.W., Raper R.L., Balkcom K.S., et al. Simulating field-scale soil organic carbon dynamics using EPIC. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2007, 71:1174-1185.
6. Causarano H.J., Doraiswamy P.C., McCarty G.W., Hatfield J.L., Milak S., Stern A.J. EPIC modeling of soil organic carbon sequestration in croplands of Iowa. J Environ Qual 2008, 37:1345-1353.
7. CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center) Crop residue management survey 2007, Conservation Technology Information Center, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
8. Dalcin L.D., Paz R.R., Kler P.A., Cosimo A. Parallel distributed computing using python. Adv Water Resour 2011, 34:1124-1139.
9. Davidson E.A., Lefebvre P.A. Estimating regional carbon stocks and spatially covarying edaphic factors using soil maps at three scales. Biogeochemistry 1993, 22:107-131.
10. Denman K.L., Brasseur G., Chidthaisong A., Ciais P., Cox P.M., Dickinson R.E., et al. Coupling between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
11. Dolman A.J., Gerbig C., Noilhan J., Sarrat C., Miglietta F. Detecting regional variability in sources and sinks of carbon dioxide: a synthesis. Biogeosciences 2009, 6:1015-1026.
12. Farr T.G., Rosen P.A., Caro E., Crippen R., Duren R., Hensley S., et al. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 2007, 45(2):RG2004.
13. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., Arnold J.G. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE 2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
14. Gelfand I., Sahajpal R., Zhang X., Izaurralde R.C., Robertson G.P. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 2013, 493:514-517.
15. He X., Izaurralde R.C., Vanotti M.B., Williams J.R., Thomson A.M. Simulating long-term crop productivity and soil organic carbon dynamics with the EPIC model using data from Arlington, WI. J Environ Qual 2006, 35:1608-1619.
16. Houghton R.A., Hall F., Goetz S.J. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. J Geophys Res 2009, 114:G00E03. 10.1029/2009JG000935.
17. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M.M.B. Tignor, H.L. Miller, Z. Chen (Eds.).
18. Izaurralde R.C., Williams J.R., McGill W.B., Rosenberg N.J., Quiroga Jakas M.C. Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol Model 2006, 192(3-4):362-384.
19. Izaurralde R.C., Williams J.R., Post W.M., Thomson A.M., McGill W.B., Owens L., et al. Long-term modeling of soil C erosion and sequestration at the small watershed scale. Clim Change 2007, 80:73-90. 10.1007/s10584-006-9167-6.
20. Johnson D.M., Mueller R. The 2009 crop data layer. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2010, 76:1201-1205.
21. Jones C.A., Dyke P.T., Williams J.R., Kiniry J.R., Benson V.W., Griggs R.H. EPIC: an operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability. Agr Syst 1991, 37:341-350.
22. Klingebiel A.A., Montgomery P.H. Land-capability classification. Issue 210 of agriculture handbook, soil conservation service 1961, 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
23. Lal R., Bruce J.P. The potential of world cropland soils to sequester C and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Environ Sci Pol 1999, 2:177-185.
24. Legates D.R., Gregory J.M. Evaluating the use of "goodness of fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Res Res 1999, 35(1):233-241.
25. Mednick A.C. Does soil data resolution matter? State soil geographic database versus soil survey geographic database in rainfall-runoff modeling across Wisconsin. J Soil Water Conserv 2010, 65(3):190-199.
26. Moureaux C., Debacq A., Hoyaux J., Suleau M., Tourneur D., Vancutsem F., et al. Carbon balance assessment of a Belgian winter wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.). Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14:1353-1366.
27. Nichols J., Kang S., Post W.M., Wang D., Bandaru P., Manowitz D., et al. HPC-EPIC for high resolution simulations of environmental and sustainability assessment. Comput Electron Agric 2011, 79(2):112-115.
28. Ogle S.M., Breidt F.J., Easter M., Williams S., Killian K., Paustian K. Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process-based model. Glob Chang Biol 2010, 16:810-822.
29. Parton W.J., Ojima D.S., Cole C.V., Schimel D.S. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes 1994, 147-167. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, [Special Publication 39]. R.B. Bryant, R.W. Arnold (Eds.).
30. Paustian K., Brenner J., Killian K., Cipra J., Williams S., Elliott E.T., et al. State-level analyses of C sequestration in agricultural soils. Agricultural practices and policies for carbon sequestration in soil 2002, 193-204. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J.M. Kimble (Ed.).
31. Rasmussen C. Distribution of soil organic and inorganic carbon pools by biome and soil taxa in Arizona. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2006, 70(1):256-265.
32. Saby N.P.A., Bellamy P.H., Morvan X., Arrouays D., Jones R.J.A., Verheijen F.G.A., et al. Will European soil-monitoring networks be able to detect changes in topsoil organic carbon content?. Glob Chang Biol 2008, 14:2432-2442.
33. 2 exchange during a large scale drought event: results from the NACP site synthesis. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 2010, 115:G00H05. 10.1029/2009JG001229.
34. Secchi S., Kurkalova L., Gassman P.W., Hart C. Land use change in a biofuels hotspot: the case of Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35(6):2391-2400.
35. Smith P., Martino D., Cai Z., Gwary D., Janzen H., Kumar P., et al. Agriculture. In climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
36. Soil Survey Staff Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database for [IOWA] Available online at, [verified on August 20, 2013]. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov.
37. Srinivasan R., Arnold J.G., Jones C.A. Hydrologic modeling of the united states with the soil and water assessment tool. Water Resour Dev 1998, 14(3):315-325.
38. Srinivasan R., Zhang X., Arnold J.G. SWAT ungauged: hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Trans ASABE 2010, 53(5):1533-1546.
39. Surendran Nair S., Kang S., Zhang X., Miguez F.E., Izaurralde R.C., Post W.M., et al. Bioenergy crop models: descriptions, data requirements, and future challenges. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 4(6):620-633.
40. Soil Survey Staff Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database for Iowa 2013, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, [Available online at http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/, verified on September 24, 2013].
41. Sus O., Williams M., Bernhofer C., Beziat P., Buchmann N., Ceschia E., et al. A linked carbon cycle and crop developmental model: description and evaluation against measurements of carbon fluxes and carbon stocks at several European agricultural sites. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2010, 139:402-418.
42. Tilman D., Hill J., Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 2006, 314:1598-1600.
43. USDA-ERS (Economic Research Service) Fertilizer use and price Available at, [verified on October 24, 2013]. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/fertilizer-use-and-price.aspx#.UmluAvmkqpA.
44. USDA-FSA Fact sheet: Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) benefits: water quality, soil productivity and wildlife estimates 2008, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Washington, DC.
45. USDA-FSA (United Department of Agriculture - Farm Service Agency) Conservation Reserve Program Annual Summary and Enrollment Statistics FY 2010 Available at, [accessed on July 6, 2012]. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/annual2010summary.pdf.
46. USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service) Usual planting and harvesting dates for U.S. field crops Available at, [accessed on Oct. 18, 2011]. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Usual_Planting_and_Harvesting_Dates/uph97.pdf.
47. USDA-NRCS (United Department of Agriculture - National Resources Conservation Service) National Soil Survey Center Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) data base data use information Available at, [verified on September 23, 2013]. ftp://ftp.igsb.uiowa.edu/gis_library/Support_Data/Soils/SSURGO.PDF.
48. Wang X., He X., Williams J.R., Izaurralde R.C., Atwood J.D. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of crop productivity and soil organic carbon simulated with EPIC. Trans ASAE 2005, 48:1041-1054.
49. West T.O., Post W.M. Soil organic carbon sequestration by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2002, 66:1930-1946.
50. West T.O., Brandt C.C., Baskaran L.M., Hellwinckel C.M., Mueller R., Bernacchi C.J., et al. Cropland carbon fluxes in the United States: increasing geospatial resolution of inventory-based carbon accounting. Ecol Appl 2010, 20(4):1074-1086.
51. West T.O., Brown M.E., Duran R.M., Ogle S., Moss R.H. Definition, capabilities, and components of a terrestrial carbon monitoring system. Carbon Manag. 2013, 4(4):413-422.
52. Williams J.R. The EPIC model. Computer models of watershed hydrology 1995, 909-1000. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
53. Williams J.R., Jones C.A., Kiniry J.R., Spanel D.A. The EPIC crop growth model. Trans ASAE 1989, 32:497-511.
54. Wu J., Ransom M.D., Kluitenberg G.J., Nellis M.D., Seyler H.L. Land-use management using a soil survey geographic database for Finney County, Kansas. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2001, 65(1):169-177.
55. Zhang X., Izaurralde R.C., Manowitz D.H., West T.O., Post M.A., Thomson A.M., et al. An integrated modeling framework to evaluate the productivity and sustainability of biofuel crop production. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 2010, 2(5):258-277.
56. Zhang X., Beeson P., Link R., Manowitz D., Izaurralde R.C., Sadeghi A., et al. Efficient multi-objective calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model with parallel computing software in python. Environ Model Software 2013, 46:208-218.
57. Zhang X., Izaurralde R.C., Arnold J.G., Williams J.R. Modifying the SWAT model to simulate cropland carbon flux: model development and initial evaluation. Sci Total Environ 2013, 463-464:810-822.
58. Zhong B., Xu Y.J. Scale effects of geographical soil datasets on soil carbon estimation in Louisiana, USA: a comparison of STATSGO and SSURGO. Pedosphere 2011, 21(4):491-501.