Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women referred to an italian center for osteoporosis: A single day experience in messina

Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 191-194

  Catalano, Antonino ^a   Morabito, Nancy ^a   Basile, Giorgio ^a   Fusco, Sergio ^a   Castagna, Graziella ^a   Reitano, Francesca ^a   Albanese, Raffaella Ciano ^a   Lasco, Antonino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fragility fractures; FRAX; Osteoporosis; Prevention; Quantitative ultrasound

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894215836     PISSN: 17248914     EISSN: 19713266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Piscitell P. Gimigliano F, Gatto S. et al. Hip fractures in Italy: 2000-2005 extension study. Osteoporos mt 2010:21(8):1323-1330.
2. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider O, Sambrool (Pubitemid 29126875)
3. Kanis, JA, Hans O, Cooper C, Bairn S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, at at. Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos mt 2011 22(9)2395-241 1.
4. Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Oden A, Leslie WD. FRAX(® ) with and without bone rnineral density. Calcif Tissue mt 201290(1):1-13.
5. Adami S. Bertoldo F, Brandi ML et at. Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Reumalismo 2009:61(4)260-84.
6. Woild Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical Report Series. WHO, Geneva 1994.
7. Italian Statistics 2008. National Institute of Statistics, Rome, 2009.
8. Piscitelli P, Guids G, lolascon G, et at. Incidence and costs of hip fractures vs. acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: A 4 years survey. Osteoporos Int 2007:18:211-219. (Pubitemid 46090225)
9. Bcanc ML Evakiation of fracture risk and fracture prevention: An Italian picture. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2012:(9):73-75.
10. Nayak 5, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmeriopausal women. Ann Intern Med 2011 :1 55(1 1):751-61.
11. Gluer CC. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: Expert agreement on current status. The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. J Bone Miner Res 19978:1280-1288.
12. Wüster C, Albanese C, De Aloysio D, et at. Phalangeal osteosonogrammetly study: Age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. The Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study Group. J Bone Miner Res 2000:15(8):1603-1614. (Pubitemid 30484531)
13. Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid OM, et at. Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: The OPUS study. J Bone Miner Rae 2004:19:782-793. (Pubitemid 41094390)
14. KanisJA, Jotinell O, Oden A, De Laot C, De Terlizzi F. Ten-year probabities of dinical vertebral fractures according to phalangeat quantitative ultrasonography. Osteoporos nt 2005:16(9):1065-1070. (Pubitemid 41225092)
15. Cataiano A, Morabito N, Di Vieste G, et at. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound and metabolic control in premenopausal women with type I diabetes mellitus. J Endocnnol Invest 2012 Oct 1 [Epub ahead of print].
16. Leslie WD, Mumdar SR, Ux LM, et al. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitornetnc osteoporosis: Implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos tnt 201 2:23(1):391-7.