Recruitment and retention of blood donors in four Canadian cities: An analysis of the role of community and social networks

Transfusion

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2013, Pages

  Smith, André ^a   Matthews, Ralph ^b   Fiddler, Jay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894203449     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12478     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Drackley A, Newbold KB, Paez A, et al. Forecasting Ontario's blood supply and demand. Transfusion 2012;52: 366-74.
2. Riley W, Schwei M, McCullough J. The United States' potential blood donor pool: estimating the prevalence of donor-exclusion factors on the pool of potential donors. Transfusion 2007;47: 1180-8. (Pubitemid 46934311)
3. Piliavin JA, Callero PL. Giving blood: the development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.
4. Crawford SO, Reich NG, An MW, et al. Regional and temporal variation in American Red Cross blood donations, 1995 to 2005. Transfusion 2008;48: 1576-83.
5. Shaz BH, Demmons DG, Hillyer KL, et al. Racial differences in motivators and barriers to blood donation among blood donors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133: 1444-7.
6. Reich P, Roberts P, Laabs N, et al. A randomized trial of blood donor recruitment strategies. Transfusion 2006;46: 1090-6. (Pubitemid 44139481)
7. Alessandrini M. Community volunteerism and blood donation: altruism as a lifestyle choice. Transfus Med Rev 2007;21: 307-16. (Pubitemid 47444516)
8. Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP, et al. Donor deferral and resulting donor loss at the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2001 through 2006. Transfusion 2008;48: 2531-9.
9. Gonçalez TT, Di Lorenzo Oliveira C, Carneiro-Proietti AB, et al.; for the NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), International Component. Motivation and social capital among prospective blood donors in three large blood centers in Brazil. Transfusion 2013;53: 1291-301.
10. Smith A, Matthews R, Fiddler J. Blood donation and community: exploring the influence of social capital. Int J Soc Inq 2011;4: 45-63.
11. Putnam RD. Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS Polit Sci Polit 1995;28: 664-83.
12. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
13. Lin N. Building a network theory of social capital. In: Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS, editors. Social capital: theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2001. p. 3-30.
14. Wellman B, Frank KA. Network capital in a multilevel world: getting support from personal communities. In: Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS, editors. Social capital: theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2001. p. 233-73.
15. Foss RD. Community norms and blood donation. J Appl Soc Psychol 1983;13: 281-90.
16. Sojka BN, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: selfreported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sang 2008;94: 56-63. (Pubitemid 350275502)
17. Healy K. Embedded altruism: blood collection regimes and the European Union's donor population. Am J Sociol 2000; 105: 1633-57.
18. Healy K. Last best gifts: altruism and the market for human blood and organs. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2006.
19. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1991.
20. Baines D, Cunningham I. Using comparative perspective rapid ethnography in international case studies: strengths and challenges. Qual SocWork 2013;12: 73-88.
21. Millen D. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. 2000 [cited 2013 Jun 8]. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=347642.347763 &coll=DL&dl=ACM&CFID=253186624&CFTOKEN= 72650812
22. Muhr T. ATLAS.ti 6.0 [version 6]. Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2008.
23. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;13: 3-21.
24. Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 2000;3: 68-70.
25. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2001.
26. Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technol J 1981;29(2): 75-91.
27. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1983;1: 201-33.
28. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive review of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:35.