Taking into account recovery to assess vulnerability: Application to farms exposed to flooding

iEMSs 2012 - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2584-2592

  Bremond P ^a   Grelot, F ^a  

^a UMR G EAU   (France)

Author keywords

Damage; Farm; Flood; Modelling; Recovery process; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894180319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Aubry, C., F. Papy, and A. Capillon. Modelling decision-making processes for annual crop 295 management. Agricultural Systems, 56(1):45-65, 1998.
2. Bremond, P. and F. Grelot. Comparison of a systemic modelling of farm vulnerability and 297 classical methods to appraise flood damage on agricultural activities. In 11th biennal 298 conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) -Advancing 299 sustainability in a time of crisis, page 20, 2010.
3. Bubeck, P. and H. Kreibich. Natural Hazards: direct costs and losses due to the disruption 301 of production processes. CONHAZ Consortium, 2011.
4. Ekins, P. A four-capital model of wealth creation. In Ekins, P. and Max-Neef, M., editors, 303 Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation, pages 147-155. Routledge, 1992.
5. Gallopin, G. C. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global 305 Environmental Change, 16(3):293-303, 2006.
6. Matthews, K. B., K. Buchan, and A. Dalziel. Evaluating labour requirements within a 307 multi-objective land-use planning tool. In MODSIM 2003 International Congress on 308 Modelling and Simulation: Integrative Modelling of Biophysical, Social and Economic 309 Systems for Resource Management Solutions, pages 1534-1539, 2003.
7. Papy, F., J.-M. Attonaty, C. Laporte, and L.-G. Soler. Work organization simulation as a 311 basis for farm management advice - equipment and manpower, levels against climatic 312 variability. Agricultural Systems, 27:295-314, 1988.
8. Pivot, J.-M. and P. Martin. Farms adaptation to changes in flood risk: A management 314 approach. Journal of Hydrology, 267(1-2):12-25, 2002.
9. Polsky, C., R. Neff, and B. Yarnal. Building comparable global change vulnerability as 316 sessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4): 472-485, 2007.
10. Posthumus, H., J. Morris, T. M. Hess, D. Neville, E. Phillips, and A. Baylis. Impacts of the 319 summer 2007 floods on agriculture in england. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2 (3):182-189, 2009.
11. Scheuer, S., D. Haase, and V. Meyer. Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by inte322 grating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: 323 from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Natural Hazards, pages 1-21, 2010.
12. Sebillote, M. and L. G. Soler. Les processus de décision des agriculteurs. In Brossier, 326 J., Vissac, B., Moigne, J. L. L., editors, Modelisation systemique et systeme agraire - 327 Décision et organisation, pages 93-117. INRA, 1990.
13. Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. At Risk. Routledge, 2004.