Multi-method global sensitivity analyses - Results for a rainfall-runoff model

iEMSs 2012 - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1072-1079

  Massmann, Carolina ^a   Holzmann, Hubert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Calibration; Model sensitivity; Parameter fixing; Parameter interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894121536     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Cibin, R., K.P. Sudheer and I. Chaubey, Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model, Hydrological Processes, 24, 1133- 1148, doi: 10.1002/hyp.7568, 2010.
2. Holzmann, H. and H.P. Nachtnebel, Abflussprognose für mittelgroße Einzugsgebiete - Methodik und Anwendungen [Runoff forecast for medium sized basins - methods and applications], Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 54(9-10), 142-153, 2002.
3. Jakeman, A.J., F. Ghassemi and C.R. Dietrich, Calibration and reliability of an aquifer system model using generalised sensitivity analysis, Proceedings ModelCARE 90: Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling, IAHS publication 195, 1990.
4. Kirchner J.W., Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resources Research, 42, W03S04, doi:10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006.
5. Matott L.S., J.E. Babendreier, and S.T. Purucker, Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools, Water Resources Research 45, W06421, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007301, 2009.
6. Mishra, S., N. Deeds and G. Ruskauff, Global sensitivity analysis techniques for probabilistic ground water modelling, Ground Water, 47, 727-744, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00604.x, 2009.
7. Mogheir, Y., J.L.M.P de Lima and V.P. Singh, Characterising the spatial variability of groundwater quality using the entropy theory: I. Synthetic data. Hydrological Processes, 18, 2165-2179, doi:10.1002/hyp.1465, 2004.
8. Ratto, M., P.C. Young, R. Romanowicz, F. Pappenberger, A. Saltelli and A. Pagano, Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1249-1266, doi:10.5194/hess-11-1249-2007, 2007.
9. Reusser, D. E., and E. Zehe, Inferring model structural deficits by analyzing temporal dynamics of model performance and parameter sensitivity, Water Resources Research, 47, W07550, doi:10.1029/2010WR009946, 2011.
10. Saltelli, A., Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Computer Physics Communications, 145(2), 280-297, doi:10.1016/S0010- 4655(02)00280-1, 2002.
11. Wagener, T. and J. Kollat, Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis toolbox, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1021-1033, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft. 2006.06.017, 2007.