Temporal changes in the neonatal recognition cue of dohne merino lambs (ovis aries)

Chemical Senses

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 249-262

  Viviers, Marlize Z ^a   Burger, Barend V ^a   Le Roux, Niel J ^a   Morris, John ^a   Le Roux, Maritha ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC MS); Headspace analysis; Kin recognition; Sample enrichment probe; Semiochemical communication; SEP technique

Indexed keywords

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC-MS); HEADSPACE ANALYSIS; KIN RECOGNITION; SAMPLE ENRICHMENT PROBE; SEMIOCHEMICAL COMMUNICATION; SEP TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CUES; FEMALE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SHEEP, DOMESTIC; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; WOOL;

EID: 84894074740     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt075     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albone ES. 1984. Mammalian Semiochemistry. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Aldrich C, Gardner S, Le Roux NJ. 2004. Monitoring of metallurgical process plants using biplots. J Am Inst Chem Eng. 50:2167-2186.
3. Alexander G, Shillito EE. 1977. The importance of odor, appearance and voice in maternal recognition of the young in Merino sheep (Ovis aries). Appl Anim Ethol. 3:127-135.
4. Alexander G, Stevens D. 1981. Recognition of washed lambs by Merino ewes. Appl Anim Ethol. 7:77-86.
5. Archie EA, Theis KR. 2011. Animal behaviour meets microbial ecology. Anim Behav. 82:425-436.
6. Burger BV. 2005. Mammalian semiochemicals. Topics in Curr Chem. 240:231-278.
7. Burger BV, Marx B, le Roux M, Herbert SA, Amakali KT. 2011a. Development of second-generation sample enrichment probe (SEP) for improved sorptive analysis of volatile organic compounds. J Chromatogr A. 1218:1567-1575.
8. Burger BV, Viviers MZ, le Roux, NJ, Morris J, Bekker JPI, le Roux M. 2011b. Olfactory cue mediated neonatal recognition in sheep, Ovis aries. J Chem Ecol. 37:1150-1163.
9. Chambers ST, Syhre M, Murdoch DR, McCartin F, Epton MJ. 2009. Detection of 2-pentylfuran in the breath of patients with Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol. 47:468-76.
10. Dormont L, Bessière J.M, Cohuet C. 2013. Human skin volatiles: a review. J Chem Ecol. 39: 569-578
11. Gardner-Lubbe S, le Roux NJ, Gower JC. 2008. Measures of fit in principal component and canonical variate analyses. J Appl Statist. 35:947-965.
12. Gower J, Hand, DJ. 1996. Biplots. London: Chapman Hall.
13. Gower JC, Lubbe S, Le Roux NJ. 2011. Understanding Biplots (Sections 5.8-5.9). Chichester: Wiley.
14. Keller M, Meurisse M, Lévy F. 2005. Mapping of brain networks involved in consolidation of lamb recognition memory. Neuroscience 133:359-369.
15. Kowalski BR, Bender CF. 1972. Pattern recognition. A powerful approach to interpreting chemical data. J Am Chem Soc. 94:5632-5639.
16. Lévy F, Gervais R, Kindermann U, Litterio M, Poindron P, Porter R. 1991. Effects of post-partum separatiobn of maternal responsiveness and selectivity in parturient ewes. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 31 101-110
17. Lévy F, Keller M, Poindron P. 2004. Olfactory regulation of maternal behavior in mammals. Horm Behav. 46:284-302.
18. Lindsay D. 1988. Breeding the Flock: Modern Research and Reproduction in Sheep. Melbourne: Inkata Press.
19. Lisovac AM, Shooter D. 2003. Volatiles from sheep wool and the modification of wool odors. Small Ruminant Res. 49:115-124.
20. Lynch JJ, Hinch GN, Adams DB. 1992. The Behaviour of Sheep. Biological Principles and Implications for Production. Melbourne: CAB International and CSIRO Australia.
21. Morgan PD, Boundy CAP, Arnold GW, Lindsay DR. 1975. The roles played by the senses of the ewe in the location and recognition of lambs. Appl Anim Ethol. 1:139-150.
22. Motiuk K. 1979a. Wool wax acids: a review. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 56:91-97.
23. Motiuk K. 1979b. Wool wax acids: a review. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 56:651-658.
24. Motiuk K. 1980. Wool wax acids: a review. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 57:145-14.6
25. Poindron P, Carrick MJ. 1976. Hearing recognition of the lamb by its mother. Anim Behav. 24:600-602.
26. Poindron P, Otal J, Ferreira G. Keller M, Guesdon V, Nowak R, Lévy F. 2010. Amniotic fluid is important for the maintenance of maternal responsiveness and the establishment of maternal selectivity in sheep. Animal. 4:2057-2064.
27. Rietdorf M. 2002. Identifizierung und Synthese flüchtiger Substanzen aus Säugetieren. PhD Thesis, Universität von Hamburg.
28. Schlossman ML, McCarthy JP. 1979. Lanolin and derivatives chemistry: relationship to allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 5:65-72.
29. Shillito EE, Alexander G. 1975. Mutual recognition amongst ewes and lambs of four breeds of sheep (Ovis aries). Appl Anim Ethol. 1:151-165.
30. Stafford M, Horning MG, Zlatkis A. 1976. Profiles of volatile metabolites in body fluids. J Chromatogr. 126:495-502.
31. Terrazas A, Ferreira G, Lévy F, Nowak R, Serafin N, Orgeur P, Soto R, Poindron P. 1999. Do ewes recognize their lambs within the first day postpartum without the help of olfactory cues? Behav Proc. 47:19-29.
32. Wyat TD. 2010. Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A. 196:685-700.
33. Zou C, Li Z, Yu D. 2010. Bacillus megaterium Strain XTBG34 promotes plant growth by producing 2-pentylfuran. J Microbiol. 48:460-466.