Limited microdiscectomy for lumbar disk herniation: A retrospective long-term outcome analysis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Soliman, John ^a,b   Harvey, Adrian ^a,b   Howes, Greg ^a,b   Seibly, Jason ^a,b   Dossey, John ^c   Nardone, Emilio ^a,b  

^a Illinois State University and Carle BroMenn Medical Center Endowed Professor   (United States)

^b Central Illinois Neuro Health Science   (United States)

^c ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggressive discectomy; Fragmentectomy; Limited discectomy; Long term outcome; Lumbar disk herniation; Minimally invasive; Retrospective analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84894029116     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828da8f1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McGirt MJ, Garcés Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of Outcomes Reported For Limited Verses Aggressive Disc Removal. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:338-345.
2. Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg. 1977;4:74-81.
3. Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier D, et al. The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:78-87.
4. Davis R. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:415-421.
5. Ebling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ. Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy: review on 485 patients. Microlumbar discectomy. Neurochir (Wien). 1986;81:45-52.
6. Findlay GF, Hall BI, Musa BS, et al. A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine. 1998;23:1168-1171.
7. Goald H. Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 147 patients. Spine. 1978;3:183-185.
8. Goald H. Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients. J Microsurg. 1980;2:95-100.
9. Hirabayashi S, Kumano K, Ogawa Y, et al. Microdiscectomy and second operations for disc herniation. Spine. 1993;18:2206-2211.
10. Houten JK, Frempong-Boadu AK, Arkovitz MS. Bowel injury as a complication of microdiscectomy: case report and literature review. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:248-250.
11. Kim DH, Jaikumar S, Kam AC. Minimally invasive spine instrumentation. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S15-S25.
12. Jaikumar S, Kim DH, Kam A. History of minimally Invasive Surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S1-S14.
13. Loew F, Caspar W. Surgical approach to lumbar disc herniation. In: Krayenbühl H, et al, ed. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Wien, New York: Springer; 1978:153-174.
14. Maroon J. Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(suppl 2):S2-137-S2-145.
15. Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI. Review: complications of minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:s2-26-s2-36.
16. Yasargil M. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurg. 1977;4:81-82.
17. Kotilainen E, Valtonen S, Carlson CA. Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Follow-up of 237 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;120:143-149.
18. Lowell TD, Errico TJ, Fehlings MG, et al. Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a review of 100 cases. Orthopedics. 1995;18:985-990.
19. Pappas C, Harrington T, Sonntag V. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:862-866.
20. Quigly M, Bost J, Maroon J, et al. Outcome after microdiscectomy: results of a prospective single institutional study. Surg Neurol. 1998;49:263-268.
21. Kahanovitz N, Viola K, McCulloch J. Limited surgical discectomy and microdiscectomy a clinical comparison. Spine. 1989;14: 79-81.
22. Rodgers L. Experience with limited vs. extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operation for ruptured lumbar disc. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:82-85.
23. Silvers HR. Microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:837-841.
24. Spengler D. Lumbar discectomy: results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine. 1982;7:604-607.
25. Thome C, Barth M, Scharf J, et al. Outcome after lumbar sequestrectomy compared with microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:271-278.
26. Wenger N, Mariana L, Kalbarczyk A, et al. Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:329-333.
27. Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy: a 12-year statistical review. Spine. 1986;11:851-852.
28. Fairbank JCT, Davies JB. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271-273.
29. Faulhauer K, Manicke C. Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;133:107-111.
30. Sadhasivam S, Kaynar AM. Iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula during lumbar microdiscectomy. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1815-1817. Table of contents.