An independent jury-based consensus conference model for the development of recommendations in medico-surgical practice

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 155, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 390-397

  Lesurtel, Mickaël ^a   Perrier, Arnaud ^b   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^c   Langer, Bernard ^d   Clavien, Pierre Alain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; DENMARK; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84894028114     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Participatory technology assessment. European perspectives. Joss S, Bellucci S, editors. London: Center for the Study of Democracy/University of Westminster; 2002.
2. P.A. Clavien, M. Lesurtel, P.M. Bossuyt, G.J. Gores, B. Langer, and A. Perrier Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report Lancet Oncol 13 2012 e11 e22
3. J. Grundahl The Danish consensus conference model S. Joss, J. Durant, Public participation in science: the role of consensus conferences in Europe 1995 Science Museum London
4. S. Joss Evaluating consensus conferences: necessity or luxury? S. Joss, J. Durant, Public participation in science: the role of consensus conferences in Europe 1995 Science Museum London 41 49
5. P. Song, R.G. Tobe, Y. Inagaki, N. Kokudo, K. Hasegawa, and Y. Sugawara et al. The management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: a comparison of guidelines from 2001 to 2011 Liver Int 32 2012 1053 1063
6. M. Lesurtel, and P.A. Clavien 2010 International Consensus Conference on Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: texts of experts Liver Transpl 17 Suppl 2 2011 S1 S5
7. Elliott J, Heesterbeek S, Lukensmeyer CL, Slocum N. Participatory methods toolkit: a practitioner's manual [updated 2005]. Available from: www.kbs-frb.be.
8. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gotzsche, and J.P. Ioannidis et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 2009 b2700
9. D. Moher, I. Simera, K.F. Schulz, J. Hoey, and DG. Altman Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research BMC Med 6 2008 13
10. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence [updated 2009 Mar; cited 2010 Nov]. Available from: www.cebm.net.
11. G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, E.A. Akl, R. Kunz, G. Vist, and J. Brozek et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 383 394
12. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, H.J. Schunemann, P. Tugwell, and A. Knottnerus GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 380 382