A tiered area-of-review framework for geologic carbon sequestration

Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-35

  Birkholzer, Jens ^a   Cihan, Abdullah ^a   Bandilla, Karl ^b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

area of review; geologic carbon sequestration; pressure impact

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; INJECTION (OIL WELLS);

AREA OF REVIEWS; GEOLOGIC CARBON SEQUESTRATIONS; PRESSURE IMPACT; REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS; REGULATORY STANDARDS; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCIES;

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EID: 84893985107     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21523878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1393     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). in Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, ed by, Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, and, Mayer L, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, NY, USA (2005).
2. Doughty C, and, Pruess K, Modeling supercritical carbon dioxide injection in heterogeneous porous media. Vadose Zone J 3 (3): 837-847 (2004).
3. 2 leakage from deep geological storage. Chem Geol 268 (3-4): 281-297 (2009).
4. Wilkin RT, and, Digiulio DC, Geochemical impacts to groundwater from geologic carbon sequestration: controls on ph and inorganic carbon concentrations from reaction path and kinetic modeling. Environ Sci Technol 44 (12): 4821-4827 (2010).
5. 2 storage in deep saline aquifers: a sensitivity study on the pressure response in stratified systems. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3 (2): 181-194 (2009).
6. 2 storage: capacity and regulatory implications. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3 (6): 745-756 (2009).
7. Bandilla KW, Celia MA, Elliot TR, Person M, Ellet K, Rupp J, et al,., Modeling carbon sequestration in the illinois basin using a vertically- integrated approach. Comput Visualization Sci 15: 39-51 (2012).
8. Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, and, Bachu S, Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Water Resour Res DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002997 (2004).
9. 2 storage: static and dynamic evaluations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (4): 850-861 (2011).
10. Gleason RA, Thamke JN, Smith BD, Tangen BA, Chesley-Preston T, and, Preston TM, Examination of brine contamination risk to aquatic resources from petroleum development in the Williston Basin, United States Department of Interior, US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2011-3047, 4 p. (2011).
11. 2) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells, Final Rule, December 10 (2010).
12. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Well Area of Review Evaluation and Corrective Action Guidance for Owners and Operators, EPA, Office of Water (4606M), EPA 816-R-13-005, May (2013).
13. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Draft Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Well Site Characterization Guidance for Owners and Operators, EPA, Office of Water (4606M), EPA 816-D-10-006, March (2011).
14. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Well Construction Guidance, EPA, Office of Water (4606M), EPA 816-R-11-020, March (2012).
15. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Well Testing and Monitoring Guidance, EPA, Office of Water (4606M), EPA 816-R-13-001, March (2013).
16. Schnaar G, and, Digiulio DC, Computational modeling of the geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide. Vadose Zone J 8: 389-403 (2009).
17. Bandilla KW, Kraemer SR, and, Birkholzer JT, Using semi-analytical solutions to approximate the area of potential impact for carbon dioxide injection. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 8: 196-204 (2012).
18. Nicot J-P, Oldenburg CM, Bryant SL, and, Hovorka SD, Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces. Proceedings 9th International Conference of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Washington, USA, November (2008).
19. 2 injection. Transp Porous Media 87 (2): 525-540 (2011).
20. 2 leakage from geological storage: analytical models, numerical models, and data needs. Proceedings of the GHGT-7 Meeting, Vancouver, September (2004).
21. Gasda SE, Nordbotten JM, and, Celia MA, Determining effective wellbore permeability from a field pressure test: a numerical analysis of detection limits. Environ Geol 54: 1207-1215 (2008).
22. 2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ Sci Technol 43: 743-749 (2009).
23. 2-enhanced oil recovery, in Paper SPE 11294, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA, April19-23 (2008).
24. 2 leakage along wellbores. SPE Drilling Completion 24: 115-126 (2009).
25. 2. Environ Geol 57: 1625-1638 (2009).
26. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Technical Program Overview Underground Injection Control Regulations, Office of Water Report 4606 EPA 816-R-02-025, December (2002).
27. 2 injection and water production to optimize aquifer storage capacity. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5: 555-564 (2011).
28. 2 storage in saline formations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 7: 168-180 (2012).
29. 2 reservoir management for carbon storage: analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 6: 230-245 (2012).
30. Bandilla KW, Court B, Elliot TR, and, Celia MA, Comparison of brine production scenarios for geologic carbon sequestration. CMTC 151250, Carbon Management Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, February 7-9 (2012).
31. Court B, Bandilla KW, Celia MA, Buscheck TA, Nordbotten JM, Dobossy M, and, Janzen A, Initial evaluation of advantageous synergies associated with simultaneous brine production and CO2 geological sequestration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 8: 90-100 (2012).
32. Harto CB, and, Veil JA, Management of extracted water from carbon sequestration projects, Argonne National Laboratory Report, ANL/EVS/R-11/1, January 2011, 38 pages (2011).
33. Nelson EB, Well Cementing (Developments in Petroleum Science). Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990).
34. 2 producer. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4: 186-197 (2010).
35. Gasda SE, Celia MA, Wang JE, and, Duguid A, Well permeability estimates from vertical interference testing of existing wells. Proceedings of the GHGT-11 Meeting, Kyoto, November 2012, Energy Procedia 37: 5673-5680 (2013).
36. Duguid A, Busch R, Carey JW, Celia MA, Chugunov N, Gasda SE, et al,., Pre-injection baseline data collection to establish existing well leakage properties. Proceedings of the GHGT-11 Meeting, Kyoto, November 2012, Energy Procedia 37: 5661-5672 (2013).
37. 2 and brine leakage along old wells. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5: 257-269 (2011).
38. Cihan A, Zhou Q, and, Birkholzer J, Analytical solutions for pressure perturbation and fluid leakage through aquitards and wells in multilayered aquifer systems. Water Resour Res DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010721 (2011).
39. 2 storage on freshwater sections of aquifers: an example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (4): 582-593 (2008).
40. 2 storage in multilayered aquifers. Groundwater 51 (2): 252-267 (2013).
41. 2 sequestration site. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 18: 388-400 (2013).
42. 2 leakage through well cements at reservoir conditions. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3: 494-501 (2009).
43. 2 leakage through conduits. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-4266E, (2011). Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/ 9135t3t8 [12 December 2013].
44. Jordan PW, and, Hare JL, Locating abandoned wells: a comprehensive manual of methods and resources. Solution Mining Institute, Report No. 2002-1-SMRI, June (2002).
45. Veloski GA, Hammack RW, and, Lynn RJ, Practical Methods for locating abandoned wells in populated areas, extended abstract, 20th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Denver, CO, April 1-5, 2007.
46. Xia J, Chen C, Xia S, and, Laflen D, Applications of high-resolution magnetic method and gradient method in locating abandoned brine wells in Hutchinson, Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Open-file Report 2003-48, 150 p (2003).
47. Zoback MD, and, Gorelick SM, Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109 (26): 10164-10168 (2012).
48. National Academy of Sciences, Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies, NAS Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, Committee on Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 20001 (2012).
49. Mazzoldi A, Rinaldi AP, Borgia A, and, Rutqvist J, Induced seismicity within geological carbon sequestration projects: maximum earthquake magnitude and leakage potential from undetected faults. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 10: 434-442 (2012).
50. 2 injection in the shallow crust. Geophys J Int 190 (3): 1784-1789 (2012).
51. Myer LR, and, Daley TM, Elements of a best practices approach to induced seismicity in geologic storage. Energy Procedia 4: 3707-3713 (2011).
52. Zhang Y, Person M, Rupp J, Ellett K, Celia MA, Gable CW, et al,., Hydrogeologic controls on induced seismicity in crystalline basement rocks due to fluid injection into basal reservoirs. Groundwater 51 (4): 525-538 (2013).