Conservative water use under high evaporative demand associated with smaller root metaxylem and limited trans-membrane water transport in wheat

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 257-269

  Schoppach, Rémy ^a   Wauthelet, Diego ^a   Jeanguenin, Linda ^a   Sadok, Walid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

aquaporins; drought tolerance; hydraulic restriction; transpiration.

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893939208     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP13211     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with Image J. Biophotonics International 11, 36-42.
2. Babé A, Lavigne T, Séverin JP, Nagel KA, Walter A, Chaumont F, Batoko H, Beekman T, Draye X (2012) Repression of early lateral root initiation events by transient water deficit in barley and maize. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367, 1534-1541. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0240
3. Bennett D, Reynolds M, Mullan D, Izanloo A, Kuchel H, Langridge P, Schnurbusch T (2012) Detection of two major grain yield QTL in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under heat, drought and high yield potential environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125, 1473-1485. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1927-2
4. Bonneau J, Taylor J, Parent B, Bennett D, Reynolds M, Feuillet C, Langridge P, Mather D (2013) Multi-environment analysisandimprovedmappingof a yield-relatedQTLonchromosome3Bofwheat. Theoreticaland Applied Genetics 126, 747-761. doi:10.1007/s00122-012-2015-3
5. Boursiac Y, Chen S, Luu D-T, Sorieul M, Van Den Dries N, Maurel C (2005) Early effectsofsalinityonwater transport inArabidopsisroots. Molecular and cellular features of aquaporin expression. Plant Physiology 139, 790-805. doi:10.1104/pp.105.065029
6. Bramley H, Turner NC, Turner DW, Tyerman SD (2009) Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots. Plant Physiology 150, 348-364. doi:10.1104/pp.108.134098
7. Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GLA, D'Amore R, Allen AM, McKenzie N, Kramer M, Kerhornou A, Bolser D, Kay S, Waite D, Trick M, Bancroft I, Gu Y, Huo N, Luo M-C, Sehgal S, Gill B, Kianian S, Anderson O, Kersey P, Dvorak J, McCombie WR, Hall A, Mayer KFX, Edwards KJ, Bevan MW, Hall N (2012) Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature491, 705-710. doi:10.1038/nature11650
8. Brisson N, Gate P, Gouache D, Charmet G, Oury F-X, Huard F (2010) Whyare wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Research 119, 201-212. doi:10.1016/j. fcr.2010.07.012
9. Carpentieri-Pipolo V, Pipolo AE, Abdel-Haleem H, Boerma HR, Sinclair TR (2012) Identification of QTLs associated with limited leaf hydraulic conductance in soybean. Euphytica 186, 679-686. doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0535-6
10. Carvajal M, Cooke DT, Clarkson DT (1996) Responses of wheat plants to nutrientdeprivationmay involvethe regulationofwater-channel function. Planta 199, 372-381. doi:10.1007/BF00195729
11. Chenu K, Deihimfard R, Chapman SC (2013) Large-scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent-wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt-spatial and temporal trends. New Phytologist 198, 801-820. doi:10.1111/nph.12192
12. Condon AG, Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1990) Genotypicvariationincarbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat. Leaf gas exchangeand whole-plantstudies. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 9-22. doi:10.1071/PP9900009
13. Devi MJ, Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2012) Transpiration response of de-rooted peanut plants to aquaporin inhibitors. Environmental and Experimental Botany 78, 167-172. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.01.001
14. Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH Jr (2007) Transpiration responses to vapour pressure deficit in well watered 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61, 145-151. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007. 05.004
15. Fleury D, Jefferies S, Kuchel H, Langridge P (2010) Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3211-3222. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq152
16. Frick A, Järvå M, Ekvall M, Uzdavinys P, Nyblom M, Törnroth-Horsefield S (2013) Mercury increases water permeability of a plant aquaporin through a non-cysteine related mechanism. Biochemical Journal 454, 491-499. doi:10.1042/BJ20130377
17. Gholipoor M, Prasad PVV, Mutava RN, Sinclair TR (2010) Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among sorghum genotypes. Field Crops Research 119, 85-90. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.018
18. Gregory PJ, Bengough AG, Grinev D, Schmidt S, Thomas WTB, Wojciechowski T, Young IM (2009) Root phenomics of crops: opportunities and challenges. Functional Plant Biology 36, 922-929. doi:10.1071/FP09150
19. Henry A, Cal AJ, Batoto TC, Torres RO, Serraj R (2012) Root attributes affecting water uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 4751-4763. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers150
20. Izanloo A, Condon AG, Langridge P, Tester M, Schnurbusch T (2008) Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 3327-3346. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern199
21. Kholová J, Hash CT, Kumar PL, Yadav RS, Kocova M, Vadez V (2010) Terminal drought-tolerant pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) have high leaf ABA and limit transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 1431-1440. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq013
22. Langridge P (2012) Genomics: decoding our daily bread. Nature 491, 678-680. doi:10.1038/491678a
23. Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2010) Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 37, 147-156. doi:10.1071/FP09121
24. Monneveux P, Jing R, Misra SC (2012) Phenotyping for drought adaptation in wheat using physiological traits. Frontiers in Physiology 3, 429. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00429
25. Munns R, James RA, Sirault XRR, Furbank RT, Jones HG (2010) New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3499-3507. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq199
26. Nagel KA, Putz A, Gilmer F, Heinz K, Fischbach A, Pfeifer J, Faget M, Blossfeld S, Ernst M, Dimaki C, Kastenholz B, Kleinert AK, Galinski A, Scharr H, Fiorani F, Schurr U (2012) GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Functional Plant Biology 39, 891-904. doi:10.1071/FP12023
27. Niemietz CM, Tyerman SD (2002) New potent inhibitorsofaquaporins: silver and gold compounds inhibit aquaporins of plant and human origin. FEBS Letters 531, 443-447. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03581-0
28. Passioura JB (1972) The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 745-752. doi:10.1071/AR9720745
29. Przedpełska-Wasowicz E, Wierzbicka M (2011) Gating of aquaporins by heavy metals in Allium cepa L. epidermal cells. Protoplasma 248, 663-671. doi:10.1007/s00709-010-0222-9
30. Quinet M, Vromman D, Clippe A, Bertin P, Lequeux H, Dufey I, Lutts S, Lefèvre I (2012) Combined transcriptomic and physiological approaches reveal strong differences between short-and long-term response of rice (Oryza sativa)toiron toxicity.Plant, Cell &Environment35, 1837-1859. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02521.x
31. Rebetzke GJ, Rattey AR, Farquhar GD, Richards RA, Condon ATG (2013) Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 40, 14-33. doi:10.1071/FP12184
32. Rengel Z, Graham RD (1996) Uptake of zinc from chelate-buffered nutrient solutions by wheat genotypes differing in zinc efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 217-226. doi:10.1093/jxb/47.2.217
33. Richards RA, Passioura JB (1981a) Seminalrootmorphology and water useof wheat. I. Environmental effects. Crop Science 21, 249-252. doi:10.2135/ cropsci1981.0011183X002100020011x
34. Richards RA, Passioura JB (1981b) Seminalrootmorphology and water useof wheat. II. Genetic variation. Crop Science 21, 253-255. doi:10.2135/cropsci1981. 0011183X002100020012x
35. Richards RA, Passioura JB (1989) A breeding programto reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 943-950. doi:10.1071/AR9890943
36. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2009) Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapour pressure deficit among soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) genotypes selected from a recombinant inbred line population. Field Crops Research 113, 156-160. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.002
37. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2010) Transpiration response of 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) genotypes to three aquaporin inhibitors under high evaporative demand. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 821-829. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp350
38. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2012) Zinc treatment results in transpiration rate decreases that vary among soybean genotypes. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35, 1866-1877. doi:10.1080/01904167.2012.706683
39. Schoppach R, Sadok W (2012) Differential sensitivities of transpiration to evaporative demand and soil water deficit among wheat elite cultivars indicate different strategies for drought tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 84, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.04.016
40. Schoppach R, Sadok W (2013) Transpiration sensitivities to evaporative demand and leaf areas vary with night and day warming regimes among wheat genotypes. Functional Plant Biology 40, 708-718. doi:10.1071/FP13028
41. Sinclair TR, Hammer GL, van Oosterom EJ (2005) Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Functional Plant Biology 32, 945-952. doi:10.1071/FP05047
42. Sinclair TR, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2008) Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 132, 446-451. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01028.x
43. Tardieu F (2012) Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: Just design the right drought scenario. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 25-31. doi:10.1093/jxb/err269
44. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818-822. doi:10.1126/science. 1183700
45. Trillo N, Fernández RJ (2005) Wheat plant hydraulic properties under prolonged experimental drought: Stronger decline in root-system conductance than in leaf area. Plant and Soil 277, 277-284. doi:10.1007/s11104- 005-7493-5
46. Vadez V, Kholová J, Yadav RS, Hash CT (2013) Small temporal differences in water uptake among varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) are critical for grain yield under terminal drought. Plant and Soil 371, 447-462. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1706-0
47. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415-421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974. tb01084.x
48. Zaman-Allah M, Jenkinson DM, Vadez V (2011) A conservative pattern of water use, rather than deep or profuse rooting, is critical for the terminal drought tolerance of chickpea. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 4239-4252. doi:10.1093/jxb/err139
49. 2 in intact wheat root cells. Plant Physiology 120, 849-858. doi:10.1104/pp.120.3.849