Carbon pricing and energy efficiency improvement -- Why to miss the interaction for developing economies? An illustrative CGE based application to the pakistan case

Energy Policy

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 87-103

  Mahmood, Arshad ^a   Marpaung, Charles O P ^a  

^a ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Carbon tax; CGE modeling; Energy efficiency improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893871975     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.072     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ADB, 2013. Asian Development Outlook 2013. Asian Development Bank (ADB). Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
2. Allan G., Hanley N., McGregor P., Swales K., Turner K. The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: a computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Econ. 2007, 29:779-798.
3. Anson S., Turner K. Rebound and disinvestment effects in refined oil consumption and supply resulting from an increase in energy efficiency in the Scottish commercial transport sector. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3608-3620.
4. Armington, P.S., 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Papers 16, 159-178.
5. Baranzini A., Goldemberg J., Speck S. Survey: a future for carbon taxes. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32:395-412.
6. Birol, F., Keppler, J.H., 2000. Prices, technology development and the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28, 457-469.
7. Bohringer C., Rutherford T. Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1997, 32:189-203.
8. Bor Y.J., Huang Y. Energy taxation and the double dividend effect in Taiwan's energy conservation policy-an empirical study using a computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2086-2100.
9. Brannlund, R., Ghalwash, T., Nordstrom, J., 2007. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Econ. 29, 1-17.
10. CDIAC, 2013. Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [WWW Document]. URL #. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.html.
11. Dai H., Masui T., Matsuoka Y., Fujimori S. Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model. Energy Policy 2011, 39:2875-2887.
12. Debowicz, D. Dorosh, P., Robinson, S., Haider, S.H., 2012a. A 2007-08 Social Accounting Matrix for Pakistan. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Pakistan Strategy Support Program, Pakistan.
13. Debowicz, D., Dorosh, P., Robinson, S., Haider, S.H., 2012b. Implications of Productivity Growth in Pakistan: An Economy-Wide Analysis. Development Strategies and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Pakistan Strategy Support Program, Pakistan.
14. Decaluwe B., Martens A. CGE modeling and developing economies: a concise empirical survey of 73 applications to 26 countries. J. Policy Model. 1988, 10:529-568.
15. Devaraian, S., Go, D.S., Lewis, J.D., Robinson, S., Sinko, P., 1994. Policy Lessons from a Simple Open-Economy Model. Policy Research Working Paper 1375. Policy Research Department. The World Bank (WB).
16. Dimitropoulos J. Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: an overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy 2007, 35:6354-6363.
17. Dorosh, P., Niazi, M.K., Nazli, H., 2006. Social Accounting Matrix for Pakistan, 2001-02: Methodology and Results. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). Islamabad. Pakistan.
18. Eurostat, 2008. Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables. Eurostat. European Commission, Luxembourg.
19. Fæhn T., Gómez-Plana A.G., Kverndokk S. Can a carbon permit system reduce Spanish unemployment?. Energy Econ. 2009, 31:595-604.
20. FBR, 2009. FBR Year Book 2008-2009. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Islamabad, Pakistan.
21. FBS, 2001. Supply and Use Tables of Pakistan 1990-91. Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS), Currently: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
22. FBS, 2009. Census of Manufacturing Industries 2005-06. Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS), Currently: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
23. FBS, 2008. Household Income and Expenditure Survey. Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS), Currently: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
24. FBS, 2011. Pakistan Statistical Year Book 2010. Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS), Currently: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
25. FD, 2008. Yearbook 2007-08. Finance Division (FD). Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
26. FD, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012a. Different issues of 'Pakistan Economic Survey'. Finance Division (FD). Economic Advisor's Wing, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
27. FD, 2012. Statistical Supplement 2008-09. Finance Division (FD). Economic Advisor's Wing, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
28. Goulder L.H. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1995, 29:271-297.
29. Greening L.A., Greene D.L., Difiglio C. Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy 2000, 28:389-401.
30. Grepperud S., Rasmussen I. A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy Econ. 2004, 26:261-282.
31. Hanley N., McGregor P.G., Swales J.K., Turner K. Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability?. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:692-709.
32. Hanley N.D., McGregor P.G., Swales J.K., Turner K. The impact of a stimulus to energy efficiency on the economy and the environment: a regional computable general equilibrium analysis. Renew. Energy 2006, 31:161-171.
33. Harmeling, S., 2012. Global Climate Risk Index 2012 Who Suffers Most From Extreme Weather Events? Weather-related Loss Events in 2010 and 1991 to 2010. Berlin.
34. HDIP, 2000, 2005, 2010. Different issues of 'Pakistan Energy Yearbook'. Hydrocarbon Development Institute of Pakistan (HDIP), Islamabad, Pakistan.
35. He Y.X., Zhang S.L., Yang L.Y., Wang Y.J., Wang J. Economic analysis of coal price-electricity price adjustment in China based on the CGE model. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6629-6637.
36. IEA, 2010a. World Energy Outlook 2010. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
37. IEA, 2010b, 2012a, Different issues of 'Key World Energy Statistics'. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
38. IEA, 2010c, 2012b. Different Issues of 'CO2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion: Highlights'. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
39. IPCC, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva.
40. IPCC, 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4). Working Group III Report "Mitigation of Climate Change", Geneva.
41. Keohane, N.O., Revesz, R.L., Stavins, R.N., 1997. The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice and Environmental Policy. Discussion Paper 97-25. Resources for the Future. Washington DC.
42. Labandeira X., Labeaga J.M., Rodríguez M. An integrated economic and distributional analysis of energy policies. Energy Policy 2009, 37:5776-5786.
43. Loisel R. Environmental climate instruments in Romania: a comparative approach using dynamic CGE modelling. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2190-2204.
44. Lu C., Tong Q., Liu X. The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy. Energy Policy 2010, 38:7278-7285.
45. Maplecroft, 2011. Climate Change Vulnerability Index 2011 [WWW Document]. URL http://maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi.html.
46. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis Foundations and Extensions 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York.
47. MoCC, 2012. National Climate Change Policy. Ministry of Climate Change (MoCC), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
48. Naqvi F. A computable general equilibrium model of energy, economy and equity interactions in Pakistan. Energy Econ. 1998, 20:347-373.
49. Nehru V., Dhareshwar A. A new database on physical capital stock: sources, methodology and results. Revista de Análisis Económico 1993, 8:37-59.
50. O'Ryan R., De Miguel C.J., Miller S., Munasinghe M. Computable general equilibrium model analysis of economywide cross effects of social and environmental policies in Chile. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54:447-472.
51. Oladosu G., Rose A. Income distribution impacts of climate change mitigation policy in the Susquehanna River Basin Economy. Energy Econ. 2007, 29:520-544.
52. PC, 2005. Medium Term Development Framework (MTDF) 2005-10. Planning Commission (PC), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
53. PC, 2007. Pakistan in the 21st Century Vision 2030. Planning Commission (PC), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
54. PC, 2011. Pakistan: Framework for Economic Growth. Planning Commission (PC), Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
55. Rao S., Keppo I., Riahi K. Importance of technological change and spillovers in long-term climate policy. Energy J. 2006, SI2006:25-41.
56. Saunders H.D. The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical growth. Energy J. 1992, 13:131-148.
57. Saunders H.D. A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 2000, 28:439-449.
58. SBP, 2008, 2010b. Different issues of 'Annual Report (Statistical Supplement)'. State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), Karachi, Pakistan.
59. SBP, 2010a. Handbook of Statistics on Pakistan Economy. State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), Karachi, Pakistan.
60. SBP, 2012. Export Receipts by Commodity_archive. State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), Karachi, Pakistan. Retrieved from: http://www.sbp.org.pk.
61. Shah A., Larsen B. Carbon Taxes, the Greenhouse Effect, and Developing Countries. Background paper for World Development Report 1992. (WB). Washington, D.C 1992, World Bank.
62. Shoven J.B., Whalley J. Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: an introduction and survey. J. Econ. Lit. 1984, XXII:1007-1051.
63. Telli Ç., Voyvoda E., Yeldan E. Economics of environmental policy in Turkey: a general equilibrium investigation of the economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction policies for climate change. J. Policy Model. 2008, 30:321-340.
64. Timilsina G.R., Shrestha R.M. General equilibrium effects of a supply side GHG mitigation option under the clean development mechanism. J. Environ. Manage. 2006, 80:327-341.
65. Turner K. Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy. Energy Econ. 2009, 31:648-666.
66. Turner K., Hanley N. Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Econ. 2011, 33:709-720.
67. UKERC, 2007. The Rebound Effect: an Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC). UK.
68. UNFCCC, 2008. Bali Action Plan: Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. In: Addendum-Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth session, Contents-Decisions adopted by the Conference of Parties.
69. UNPD, 2012. Population Aged 15-59 [WWW Document]. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. URL http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm.
70. UNSD, 1994. System of National Accounts 1993. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD). United Nations (UN), Washington, D.C.
71. Wang K., Wang C., Chen J. Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2930-2940.
72. WB, 2009, 2013,. Different issues of 'World Development Indicators'. World Bank Publications, Washington, D.C.
73. Wissema W., Dellink R. AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:671-683.
74. 2 control policies: application of AIM/CGE model to China. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 198:315-325.
75. Yang H. Carbon emissions control and trade liberalization: coordinated approaches to Taiwan's trade and tax policy. Energy Policy 2001, 29:725-734.