Reducing energy consumption by data aggregation in M2M networks

Wireless Personal Communications

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1231-1244

  Tsai, Shin Yeh ^a   Sou, Sok Ian ^a   Tsai, Meng Hsun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data aggregation; Delivery delay; Energy consumption; M2M

Indexed keywords

DATA AGGREGATION; DELIVERY DELAY; EXTENSIVE SIMULATIONS; M2M; MACHINE-TO-MACHINE COMMUNICATIONS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PACKET DELIVERY; REDUCING ENERGY CONSUMPTION;

ANALYTICAL MODELS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

MODELS;

EID: 84893871774     PISSN: 09296212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-013-1574-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Almeida, A.; Fonseca, P. (2006). Residential monitoring to decrease energy use and carbon emissions in europe. In International energy efficiency in domestic appliances and lighting conference.
2. Chen, W. E.; Lin, Y. B.; Liou, R. H. (2009). A weakly consistent scheme for ims presence service. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(7), 3815-3821.
3. Fasolo, E.; Rossi, M.; Widmer, J.; Zorzi, M. (2007). In-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(2), 70-87. (Pubitemid 46776305)
4. Heidemann, J.; Silva, F.; Intanagonwiwat, C.; Govindan, R.; Estrin, D.; Ganesan, D. (2001). Building efficient wireless sensor networks with low-level naming. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 35(5), 146-159. (Pubitemid 33612611)
5. Heinzelman, W. B.; Chandrakasan, A. P.; Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
6. Heinzelman, W. B.; Chandrakasan, A. P.; Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660-670. (Pubitemid 44934253)
7. Innovative m2m solutions. (2013). http://www.numerex.com/.
8. Kalpakis, K.; Dasgupta, K.; Namjoshi, P. (2002). Maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the joint international conference on wireless LANs and home networks.
9. Kelly, F. (1979). Reversibility and stochastic networks. New York: Wiley.
10. Krishnamachari, B.; Estrin, D.; Wicker, S. (2002). Modelling data-centric routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.
11. LTE Release 12. (2013). http://www.3gpp.org/Release-12.
12. Luo, D.; Zhu, X.; Wu, X.; Chen, G. (2011). Maximizing lifetime for the shortest path aggregation tree in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.
13. Madden, S.; Franklin, M. J.; Hellerstein, J. M.; Hong, W. (2002). Tag: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 36, 131-146.
14. Mottola, L.; Picco, G. P. (2011). Muster: Adaptive energy-aware multisink routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10(12), 1694-1709.
15. Pandey, V.; Kaur, A.; Chand, N. (2010). A review on data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network. Electronic and Electrical Engineering, 1(2), 1-8.
16. Ryberg, T. (2009). The global wireless M2M market. Berg Insight.
17. Smarter planet. (2012). www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/.
18. Solis, I.; Obraczka, K. (2004). The impact of timing in data aggregation for sensor networks. In IEEE international conference on communications.
19. Sou, S. I.; Lin, C. S. (2011). Spr proxy mechanism for 3GPP policy and charging control system. Computer Network, 55(17), 3847-3862.
20. Tsai, S. Y.; Sou, S. I.; Tsai, M. H. (2012). Effect of data aggregation in m2m networks. In Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications.
21. Wood, A.; Virone, G.; Doan, T.; Cao, Q.; Selavo, L.; Wu, Y.; Fang, L.; He, Z.; Lin, S.; Stankovic, J. (2006). Alarm-net: Wireless sensor networks for assisted-living and residential monitoring. Technical report.
22. Yao, Y.; Gehrke, J. (2002). The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. SIGMOD Record, 31(3), 9-18.