A light Higgs scalar in the NMSSM confronted with the latest LHC Higgs data

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Cao, Junjie ^a,b   Ding, Fangfang ^a   Han, Chengcheng ^c   Yang, Jin Min ^c   Zhu, Jingya ^c  

^a HENAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893847935     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)018     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. B. Mansoulié, Combination of results on the Higgs in ATLAS, talk given at the Rencontres de Moriond EW 2013, March 2-9, La Thuile, Italy (2013).
4. CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 (2013).
5. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-034 (2013).
6. J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1202.5821] [INSPIRE].
7. U. Ellwanger, A Higgs boson near 125 GeV with enhanced di-photon signal in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1112.3548] [INSPIRE].
8. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [arXiv:1112.3336] [INSPIRE].
9. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv:1112.3026] [INSPIRE].
10. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
11. - and dark matter direct detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1906 [arXiv:1112.3032] [INSPIRE].
12. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, A non standard model Higgs at the LHC as a sign of naturalness, JHEP 02 (2012) 144 [arXiv:1112.4835] [INSPIRE].
13. N.D. Christensen, T. Han and S. Su, MSSM Higgs bosons at The LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115018 [arXiv:1203.3207] [INSPIRE].
14. -1 of LHC data, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1230010 [arXiv:1203.6227] [INSPIRE].
15. K. Hagiwara, J.S. Lee and J. Nakamura, Properties of 125 GeV Higgs boson in non-decoupling MSSM scenarios, JHEP 10 (2012) 002 [arXiv:1207.0802] [INSPIRE].
16. V. Barger, M. Ishida and W.-Y. Keung, Flavor-tuned 125 GeV SUSY Higgs boson at the LHC: MSSM and natural SUSY tests, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015003 [arXiv:1207.0779] [INSPIRE].
17. F. Boudjema and G.D. La Rochelle, Supersymmetric Higgses beyond the MSSM: an update with flavour and dark matter constraints, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115007 [arXiv:1208.1952] [INSPIRE].
18. P. Bechtle et al., MSSM interpretations of the LHC discovery: light or heavy Higgs?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2354 [arXiv:1211.1955] [INSPIRE].
19. J. Ke et al., Revisit to non-decoupling MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1211.2427] [INSPIRE].
20. K. Cheung, C.-T. Lu and T.-C. Yuan, Diphoton rate of the standard-model-like Higgs boson in the extra U(1) extended MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 075001 [arXiv:1212.1288] [INSPIRE].
21. R.S. Hundi, Implications of Higgs to diphoton decay rate in the bilinear R-parity violating supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115005 [arXiv:1303.4583] [INSPIRE].
22. A. Chakraborty et al., The 125 GeV Higgs signal at the LHC in the CP-violating MSSM, arXiv:1301.2745 [INSPIRE].
23. J.L. Feng, Naturalness and the status of supersymmetry, arXiv:1302.6587 [INSPIRE].
24. T. Han, T. Li, S. Su and L.-T. Wang, Non-decoupling MSSM Higgs sector and light superpartners, arXiv:1306.3229 [INSPIRE].
25. K. Kowalska and E.M. Sessolo, Natural MSSM after the LHC 8 TeV run, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 075001 [arXiv:1307.5790] [INSPIRE].
26. S.F. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs benchmarks near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [arXiv:1201.2671] [INSPIRE].
27. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Higgs bosons near 125 GeV in the NMSSM with constraints at the GUT scale, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012 (2012) 625389 [arXiv:1203.5048] [INSPIRE].
28. R. Benbrik et al., Confronting the MSSM and the NMSSM with the discovery of a signal in the two photon channel at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2171 [arXiv:1207.1096] [INSPIRE].
29. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, Could two NMSSM Higgs bosons be present near 125 GeV?, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 071702 [arXiv:1207.1545] [INSPIRE].
30. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125GeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 454 [arXiv:1201.0982] [INSPIRE].
31. K. Agashe, Y. Cui and R. Franceschini, Natural islands for a 125 GeV Higgs in the scale-invariant NMSSM, JHEP 02 (2013) 031 [arXiv:1209.2115] [INSPIRE].
32. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A.D. Medina and M.A. Schmidt, The scale-invariant NMSSM and the 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP 02 (2013) 032 [arXiv:1212.5243] [INSPIRE].
33. S.F. King, M. Mählleitner, R. Nevzorov and K. Walz, Natural NMSSM Higgs bosons, Nucl. Phys. B 870 (2013) 323 [arXiv:1211.5074] [INSPIRE].
34. K. Kowalska et al., The constrained NMSSM with a 125 GeV Higgs boson - A global analysis, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115010 [arXiv:1211.1693] [INSPIRE].
35. L. Aparicio, P. Camara, D. Cerdeno, L. Ibáñez and I. Valenzuela, The NMSSM with F-theory unified boundary conditions, JHEP 02 (2013) 084 [arXiv:1212.4808] [INSPIRE].
36. N.D. Christensen, T. Han, Z. Liu and S. Su, Low-mass Higgs bosons in the NMSSM and their LHC implications, JHEP 08 (2013) 019 [arXiv:1303.2113] [INSPIRE].
37. M. Badziak, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, New regions in the NMSSM with a 125 GeV Higgs, JHEP 06 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1304.5437] [INSPIRE].
38. T. Cheng and T. Li, Electroweak supersymmetry (EWSUSY) in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015031 [arXiv:1305.3214] [INSPIRE].
39. T. Cheng, J. Li, T. Li and Q.-S. Yan, Natural NMSSM confronting with the LHC7-8, arXiv:1304.3182 [INSPIRE].
40. S. Moretti, S. Munir and P. Poulose, The 125 GeV Higgs boson signal within the complex NMSSM, arXiv:1305.0166 [INSPIRE].
41. J. Cao et al., Pair production of a 125 GeV Higgs boson in MSSM and NMSSM at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2013) 134 [arXiv:1301.6437] [INSPIRE].
42. J. Cao et al., Probing natural SUSY from stop pair production at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2012) 039.
43. J. Cao, L. Wu, P. Wu and J.M. Yang, The Z+photon and diphoton decays of the Higgs boson as a joint probe of low energy SUSY models, JHEP 09 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1301.4641] [INSPIRE].
44. U. Ellwanger, Higgs pair production in the NMSSM at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2013) 077 [arXiv:1306.5541] [INSPIRE].
45. U. Ellwanger, Testing the higgsino-singlino sector of the NMSSM with trileptons at the LHC, arXiv:1309.1665 [INSPIRE].
46. C. Han, F. Wang and J.M. Yang, Natural SUSY from SU(5) Orbifold GUT, arXiv:1304.5724 [INSPIRE].
47. C. Han, X. Ji, L. Wu, P. Wu and J.M. Yang, Higgs pair production with SUSY QCD correction: revisited under current experimental constraints, arXiv:1307.3790 [INSPIRE].
48. C. Han, K.-i. Hikasa, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Current experimental bounds on stop mass in natural SUSY, arXiv:1308.5307 [INSPIRE].
49. W. Wang, J.M. Yang and L.L. You, Higgs boson mass in NMSSM with right-handed neutrino, JHEP 07 (2013) 158 [arXiv:1303.6465] [INSPIRE].
50. J. Cao et al., Status of low energy SUSY models confronted with the LHC 125 GeV Higgs data, JHEP 10 (2012) 079 [arXiv:1207.3698] [INSPIRE].
51. J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [arXiv:1112.4391] [INSPIRE].
52. J.-J. Cao, Z. Heng, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Higgs decay to dark matter in low energy SUSY: is it detectable at the LHC ?, JHEP 06 (2012) 145 [arXiv:1203.0694] [INSPIRE].
53. J. Cao, H.E. Logan and J.M. Yang, Experimental constraints on NMSSM and implications on its phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 091701 [arXiv:0901.1437] [INSPIRE].
54. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].
55. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, JHEP 05 (2012) 091 [arXiv:1202.4038] [INSPIRE].
56. H. Baer et al., Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035017 [arXiv:1210.3019] [INSPIRE].
57. O. Buchmueller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2020 [arXiv:1112.3564] [INSPIRE].
58. S. Akula et al., Higgs boson mass predictions in SUGRA unification, recent LHC-7 results and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1112.3645] [INSPIRE].
59. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [arXiv:1112.3647] [INSPIRE].
60. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and D. Sanford, Focus point supersymmetry redux, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075007 [arXiv:1112.3021] [INSPIRE].
61. L. Aparicio, D.G. Cerdeno and L. Ibáñez, A 119-125 GeV Higgs from a string derived slice of the CMSSM, JHEP 04 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1202.0822] [INSPIRE].
62. J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [arXiv:1202.3262] [INSPIRE].
63. J. Ellis, F. Luo, K.A. Olive and P. Sandick, The Higgs mass beyond the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2403 [arXiv:1212.4476] [INSPIRE].
64. Z. Kang et al., A heavy SM-like Higgs and a light stop from Yukawa-deflected gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095020 [arXiv:1203.2336] [INSPIRE].
65. A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM favoring new territories: the impact of New LHC Limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1206.0264] [INSPIRE].
66. S. Akula, P. Nath and G. Peim, Implications of the Higgs boson discovery for mSUGRA, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 188 [arXiv:1207.1839] [INSPIRE].
67. - and XENON100 data, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2243 [arXiv:1207.7315] [INSPIRE].
68. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE].
69. M. Maniatis, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25 (2010) 3505 [arXiv:0906.0777] [INSPIRE].
70. J.E. Kim and H.P. Nilles, The μ problem and the strong CP problem, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 150 [INSPIRE].
71. M. Bastero-Gil et al., Does LEP prefer the NMSSM?, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 359 [hep-ph/0006198] [INSPIRE].
72. A. Delgado, C. Kolda, J.P. Olson and A. de la Puente, Solving the little hierarchy problem with a singlet and explicit μ terms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 091802 [arXiv:1005.1282] [INSPIRE].
73. S.F. King and P.L. White, Resolving the constrained minimal and next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard models, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4183 [hep-ph/9505326] [INSPIRE].
74. R. Dermisek and J.F. Gunion, Escaping the large fine tuning and little hierarchy problems in the next to minimal supersymmetric model and h → aa decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 041801 [hep-ph/0502105] [INSPIRE].
75. R. Dermisek and J.F. Gunion, The NMSSM Solution to the fine-tuning problem, precision electroweak constraints and the largest LEP Higgs event excess, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095006 [arXiv:0705.4387] [INSPIRE].
76. G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The fine-tuning of the generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 710 [arXiv:1108.1284] [INSPIRE].
77. Z. Kang, J. Li and T. Li, On naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1201.5305] [INSPIRE].
78. A. Farzinnia, H.-J. He and J. Ren, Natural electroweak symmetry breaking from scale invariant Higgs mechanism, arXiv:1308.0295 [INSPIRE].
79. R. Dermisek, J.F. Gunion and B. McElrath, Probing NMSSM scenarios with minimal fine-tuning by searching for decays of the Υ to a light CP-odd Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 051105 [hep-ph/0612031] [INSPIRE].
80. R. Dermisek and J.F. Gunion, New constraints on a light CP-odd Higgs boson and related NMSSM ideal Higgs scenarios, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075003 [arXiv:1002.1971] [INSPIRE].
81. R. Dermisek and J.F. Gunion, Many light Higgs bosons in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 055014 [arXiv:0811.3537] [INSPIRE].
82. R. Dermisek and J.F. Gunion, Many light Higgs bosons in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 055014 [arXiv:0811.3537] [INSPIRE].
83. F. Domingo, U. Ellwanger, E. Fullana, C. Hugonie and M.-A. Sanchis-Lozano, Radiative Υ decays and a light pseudoscalar Higgs in the NMSSM, JHEP 01 (2009) 061 [arXiv:0810.4736] [INSPIRE].
84. Z. Heng, R. Oakes, W. Wang, Z. Xiong and J.M. Yang, B meson dileptonic decays in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric model with a light CP-odd Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 095012 [arXiv:0801.1169] [INSPIRE].
85. A. Arhrib, K. Cheung, T.-J. Hou and K.-W. Song, Associated production of a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson with a chargino pair in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2007) 073 [hep-ph/0606114] [INSPIRE].
86. S. Andreas, O. Lebedev, S. Ramos-Sanchez and A. Ringwald, Constraints on a very light CP-odd Higgs of the NMSSM and other axion-like particles, JHEP 08 (2010) 003 [arXiv:1005.3978] [INSPIRE].
87. X.-G. He, J. Tandean and G. Valencia, Rare decays with a light CP-odd Higgs boson in the NMSSM, JHEP 06 (2008) 002 [arXiv:0803.4330] [INSPIRE].
88. F. Mahmoudi, J. Rathsman, O. Stal and L. Zeune, Light Higgs bosons in phenomenological NMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1608 [arXiv:1012.4490] [INSPIRE].
89. D.G. Cerdeno, P. Ghosh and C.B. Park, Probing the two light Higgs scenario in the NMSSM with a low-mass pseudoscalar, JHEP 06 (2013) 031 [arXiv:1301.1325] [INSPIRE].
90. D.G. Cerdeno, P. Ghosh, C.B. Park and M. Peiro, Collider signatures of a light NMSSM pseudoscalar in neutralino decays in the light of LHC results, arXiv:1307.7601 [INSPIRE].
91. J.-J. Cao et al., Light dark matter in NMSSM and implication on Higgs phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 292 [arXiv:1104.1754] [INSPIRE].
92. J. Kozaczuk and S. Profumo, Light NMSSM neutralino dark matter in the wake of CDMS II and a 126 GeV Higgs, arXiv:1308.5705 [INSPIRE].
93. M. Almarashi and S. Moretti, Very light CP-odd Higgs bosons of the NMSSM at the LHC in 4b-quark final states, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015014 [arXiv:1105.4191] [INSPIRE].
94. C. Kim, K.Y. Lee and J. Park, Discrimination of the light CP-odd scalars between in the NMSSM and in the SLHM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 117702 [arXiv:1112.6043] [INSPIRE].
95. D.A. Vasquez et al., The 125 GeV Higgs in the NMSSM in light of LHC results and astrophysics constraints, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035023 [arXiv:1203.3446] [INSPIRE].
96. D.J. Miller, R. Nevzorov and P.H. Zerwas, The Higgs sector of the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 681 (2004) 3 [hep-ph/0304049] [INSPIRE].
97. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
98. U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and C. Hugonie, NMHDECAY: a Fortran code for the Higgs masses, couplings and decay widths in the NMSSM, JHEP 02 (2005) 066 [hep-ph/0406215] [INSPIRE].
99. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, NMHDECAY 2.0: an updated program for sparticle masses, Higgs masses, couplings and decay widths in the NMSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175 (2006) 290 [hep-ph/0508022] [INSPIRE].
100. Planck collaboration, P. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
101. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
102. J. Cao, K.-i. Hikasa, W. Wang, J.M. Yang and L.-X. Yu, SUSY dark matter in light of CDMS II results: a comparative study for different models, JHEP 07 (2010) 044 [arXiv:1005.0761] [INSPIRE].
103. J. Cao, K.-i. Hikasa, W. Wang, J.M. Yang and L.-X. Yu, Constraints of dark matter direct detection experiments on the MSSM and implications on LHC Higgs search, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 051701 [arXiv:1006.4811] [INSPIRE].
104. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 138 [arXiv:0811.4169] [INSPIRE].
105. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K.E. Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2605 [arXiv:1102.1898] [INSPIRE].
106. P. Bechtle et al., HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, arXiv:1305.1933 [INSPIRE].
107. G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 161 [INSPIRE].
108. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
109. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP ELECTROWEAK WORKING GROUP, SLD ELECTROWEAK GROUP, SLD HEAVY FLAVOUR GROUP collaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
110. J. Cao and J.M. Yang, Anomaly of Zbb̄ coupling revisited in MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 12 (2008) 006 [arXiv:0810.0751] [INSPIRE].
111. CDF, D0 collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Higgs boson studies at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 052014 [arXiv:1303.6346] [INSPIRE].
112. J. Cao et al., The SM extension with color-octet scalars: diphoton enhancement and global fit of LHC Higgs data, JHEP 08 (2013) 009 [arXiv:1303.2426] [INSPIRE].
113. X.-F. Han, L. Wang, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Little Higgs theory confronted with the LHC Higgs data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 5 055004 [arXiv:1301.0090] [INSPIRE].
114. L. Wang, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Dark matter in little Higgs model under current experimental constraints from LHC, Planck and Xenon, arXiv:1307.7780 [INSPIRE].
115. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs suspects at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2012) 097 [arXiv:1202.3697] [INSPIRE].
116. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [arXiv:1203.4254] [INSPIRE].
117. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Higgs couplings at the end of 2012, JHEP 02 (2013) 053 [arXiv:1212.5244] [INSPIRE].
118. F. Boudjema et al., On the presentation of the LHC Higgs results, arXiv:1307.5865 [INSPIRE].
119. U. Ellwanger, G. Espitalier-Noel and C. Hugonie, Naturalness and fine tuning in the NMSSM: implications of early LHC results, JHEP 09 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1107.2472] [INSPIRE].
120. J. Cao, Z. Heng and J.M. Yang, Rare Z-decay into light CP-odd Higgs bosons: a comparative study in different new physics models, JHEP 11 (2010) 110 [arXiv:1007.1918] [INSPIRE].
121. K. Cheung, J. Song and Q.-S. Yan, Role of h → ηη in intermediate-mass Higgs boson searches at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 031801 [hep-ph/0703149] [INSPIRE].
122. M. Carena, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang and C.E. Wagner, Higgs signal for h → aa at hadron colliders, JHEP 04 (2008) 092 [arXiv:0712.2466] [INSPIRE].
123. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
124. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
125. J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, arXiv:1307.6346 [INSPIRE].
126. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
127. t jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
128. B. Coleppa, F. Kling and S. Su, Exotic Higgs decay via AZ/HZ channel: a Snowmass whitepaper, arXiv:1308.6201 [INSPIRE].