An instrumental variable approach for rigid industrial robots identification

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 85-101

  Janot, Alexandre ^a   Olivier Vandanjon, Pierre ^b   Gautier, Maxime ^c  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamics identification; Instrumental variable technique; Least squares techniques; Robotics

Indexed keywords

BAND PASS FILTERING; DYNAMICS IDENTIFICATIONS; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE METHODS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; INVERSE DYNAMIC MODEL; LEAST SQUARES TECHNIQUES; REFERENCE TRAJECTORIES;

INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INSTRUMENTS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; ROBOTICS;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EID: 84893830983     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Calafiore G., & Indri M. (2000a). Robust calibration and control of robotic manipulators. In Proceedings of the American control conference (pp. 2003-2007). Chicago, Illinois June 2000.
2. Calafiore G., Indri M., Bona B. Robot dynamic calibration: Optimal excitation trajectories and experimental parameter estimation. Journal of Robotic Systems 2000, 18(2):55-68.
3. Davidson R., MacKinnon J.G. Estimation and inference in econometrics 1993, 1993. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Garnier H., Gilson M., Young P.C., Huselstein E. An optimal IV technique for identifying continuous-time transfer function model of multiple input systems. Control Engineering Practice 2007, 15(4):471-486.
5. Garnier H., Wang L. Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data 2008, 2008. Springer, Springer-Verlag London Limited.
6. Gautier M., &Briot S. (2012). Global identification of drive gains parameters of robots using a known payload. In: Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2812-2817). May 2012, Saint Paul, USA.
7. Gautier M., Khalil W. Direct calculation of minimum set of inertial parameters of serial robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1990, 6(1990):368-372.
8. Gautier M., Khalil W. Exciting trajectories for the identification of the inertial parameters of robots. International Journal of Robotics Research 1992, 11:362-375.
9. Gautier M., Poignet P. Extended Kalman filtering and weighted least-squares dynamic identification of robot. Control Engineering Practice 2001, 9(2001):1361-1372.
10. Gautier M. (1997). Dynamic Identification of Robots with Power Model," In Proceedings of the of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 1922-1927). Albuquerque, USA.
11. Gautier M., Janot A., Vandanjon P.O. A new closed-loop output error method for parameter identification of robot dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2012, 21(4):428. (433).
12. Gautier M., Vandanjon P., & Janot A. (2011). Dynamic identification of a 6 DOF robot without joint position data. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Shangaï, China.
13. Gautier, M., Vandanjon P. O., & Presse C. (1994). Identification of inertial and drive gain parameters of robots. In Proceedings of the conference on decision and control (pp. 3764-3769). Lake Buean Vista, USA.
14. Gilson M., Garnier H., Young P.C., Van den Hof P. Optimal instrumental variable method for closed-loop identification. Control Theory & Applications, IET 2011, 5(10):1147-1154. 10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0476.
15. Hausman J.A. Specification tests in econometrics (1978). Econometrica 1978, 46(6):1251-1271.
16. Hollerbach J., Khalil W., Gautier M. Model identification 2008, 2008. Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Janot A., Vandanjon P. O., & Gautier M. (2009). Identification of robots dynamics with the Instrumental Variable method, In Proceedings of the IEEE on international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 1762-1767). Kobe.
18. Janot A., Vandanjon P. O., & Gautier M. (2012). Identification of 6 DOF Rigid Industrial Robots with the Instrumental Variable Method. In Proceedings of symposium on system identification 2012. Brussels, Belgium, July 2012.
19. Janot A., Vandanjon P.O., Gautier M. Identification of physical parameters and instrumental variables validation with two-stage least squares estimator. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2013, 21(4):1386-1393.
20. Khalil W., Creusot D. SYMORO+: A system for the symbolic modelling of robots. Robotica 1997, 15(1997):153-161.
21. Khalil W., Dombre E. Modeling identification and control of robots 2002, 2002. Taylor and Francis, Taylor & Francis, Inc. Bristol, PA, USA.
22. Kostic D., de Jager B., Steinbuch M., Hensen R. Modeling and identification for high-performance robot control: An RRR-Robotic arm case study. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2004, 12(6).
23. Liu T., Yao K., Gao F. Identification and autotuning of temperature-control system with application to injection molding. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2009, 17(6):1282-1294.
24. Mayeda H., Yoshida K., Osuka K. Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1990, 6(3):312-321.
25. Olsen M.M., Petersen H.G. A new method for estimating parameters of a dynamic robot model. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2001, 17(1):95-100.
26. Olsen M.M., Swevers J., Verdonck W. Maximum likelihood identification of a dynamic robot model: Implementation issues. International Journal of Robotics Research 2002, 21(2):89-96.
27. Puthenpura S.C., Sinha N.K. Identification of continuous-time systems using instrumental variables with application to an industrial robot. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 1986, IE-33(3):224-229.
28. Ramdani N., Poignet P. Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2005, 10(2):253-256.
29. Reiersøl O. Confluence analysis by means of lag moments and other methods of confluence analysis. Econometrica 1941, 9(1):1-23.
30. Söderström T., Stoica P. System identification 1989, 1989. Prentice Hall International Series in Systems and Control Engineering, Great Britain.
31. Swevers J., Ganseman C., Tukel D., DeSchutter J., VanBrussel H. Optimal robot excitation and identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1997, 13:730-740.
32. Swevers J., Verdonck W., De Schutter J. Dynamic model identification for industrial robots - Integrated experiment design and parameter estimation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2007, 27(2007):58-71.
33. Vandanjon P.-O., Janot A., Gautier M., & Khatounian F. (2007). Comparison of two identification techniques: Theory and application. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics; SS on fractional order systems (ICINCO) (pp. 341-347). Angers.
34. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48(4):817-838.
35. Xi, F. (1995). Effect of non-geometric errors on manipulator inertial calibration. In Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automationpp. (pp. 1808-1813). May 1995, Nagoya, Japan.
36. Yoshida K., Ikeda N., & Mayeda H. (1992). Experimental study of the identification methods for an industrial robot manipulator. In Proceedings of international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 1992 (pp. 263-270). Raleigh, USA.
37. Young P.C. Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction for the student and practitioner 2011, 2011. Springer Verlag, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2nd Edition.