Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: A prospective two-center study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 183-189

  Knabe, Mate ^a   Pohl, Jürgen ^a,b   Gerges, Christian ^c   Ell, Christian ^a   Neuhaus, Horst ^c   Schumacher, Brigitte ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Vivantes Klinikum Friedrichshain   (Germany)

^c Evangelisches Krankenhaus Teaching Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84893830598     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.419     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF et al. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 234-41.
2. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG et al. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1020-4.
3. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-18.
4. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S et al. Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1128-36.
5. Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and fl at colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 829-35.
6. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A et al. Short-and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (fl at and depressed) colorectal lesions or=1 cm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 857-65.
7. Higaki S, Hashimoto S, Harada K et al. Long-term follow-up of large fl at colorectal tumors resected endoscopically. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 845-9.
8. Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or fl at colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 859-66.
9. Kudo SE, Kashida H. Flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3 (7 Suppl 1): S33-6.
10. Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defi-ant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 255-63.
11. Zlatanic J, Waye JD, Kim PS et al. Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 731-5.
12. Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lange P et al. Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go? Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 131-5.
13. Hurlstone DP, Atkinson R, Sanders DS et al. Achieving R0 resection in the colorectum using endoscopic submucosal dissection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1536-42.
14. Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M et al. Incidence and predictors of " late " recurrences aft er endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 344-9.
15. Kanamori T, Itoh M, Yokoyama Y et al. Injection-incision-assisted snare resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 189-95.
16. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifi cations: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 239-43.
17. The Paris endoscopic classifi cation of superfi cial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58 (6 Suppl): S3-43.
18. Ahlawat SK, Gupta N, Benjamin SB et al. Large colorectal polyps: endoscopic management and rate of malignancy: does size matter? J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 347-54.
19. Santos CE, Malaman D, Pereira-Lima JC. Endoscopic mucosal resection in colorectal lesion: a safe and effective procedure even in lesions larger than 2 cm and in carcinomas. Arq Gastroenterol 2011; 48: 242-7.
20. Hirasaki S, Kozu T, Yamamoto H et al. Usefulness and safety of 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution as a submucosal fl uid " cushion " for endoscopic resection of colorectal mucosal neoplasms: a prospective multicenter open-label trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2009; 9: 1.
21. Mahadeva S, Rembacken BJ. Standard " inject and cut " endoscopic mucosal resection technique is practical and effective in the management of superfi cial colorectal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 417-22.
22. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superfi cially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 62-6.
23. Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rosch T et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1116-22.
24. Brooks DD, Winawer SJ, Rex DK et al. Colonoscopy surveillance aft er polypectomy and colorectal cancer resection. Am Fam Physician 2008; 77: 995-1002.
25. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance aft er polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 143-59; quiz 84-5.
26. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80 e1.
27. Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors-1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute's experiences. Surg Endosc 2012.