Troubleshooting Public Data Archiving: Suggestions to Increase Participation

PLoS Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Roche, Dominique G ^a   Lanfear, Robert ^a   Binning, Sandra A ^a   Haff, Tonya M ^a   Schwanz, Lisa E ^a   Cain, Kristal E ^a   Kokko, Hanna ^a   Jennions, Michael D ^a   Kruuk, Loeske E B ^a,b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 84893785077     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Molloy JC, (2011) The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biol 9: e1001195.
2. Guttmacher AE, Nabel EG, Collins FS, (2009) Why data-sharing policies matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16894.
3. Parr CS, Cummings MP, (2005) Data sharing in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 362-363.
4. Hanson B, Sugden A, Alberts B, (2011) Making data maximally available. Science 331: 649.
5. Huang X, Qiao G, (2011) Biodiversity databases should gain support from journals. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 377-378.
6. Vision TJ, (2010) Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioScience 60: 330-331.
7. Whitlock MC, (2011) Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 61-65.
8. Whitlock MC, McPeek MA, Rausher MD, Rieseberg L, Moore AJ, (2010) Data archiving. Am Nat 175: 145-146.
9. Reichman O, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP, (2011) Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science 331: 703-705.
10. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, et al. (2011) Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE 6: e21101.
11. Zamir D, (2013) Where have all the crop phenotypes gone? PLoS Biol 11: e1001595.
12. Hartter J, Ryan SJ, MacKenzie CA, Parker JN, Strasser CA, (2013) Spatially explicit data: stewardship and ethical challenges in science. PLoS Biol 11: e1001634.
13. National Human Genome Research Institute (2013) Reaffirmation and extension of NHGRI rapid data release policies: large-scale sequencing and other community resource projects. Available: http://www.genome.gov/10506537. Accessed 14 October 2013.
14. Huang X, Hawkins BA, Lei F, Miller GL, Favret C, et al. (2012) Willing or unwilling to share primary biodiversity data: results and implications of an international survey. Conserv Lett 5: 399-406.
15. Milia N, Congiu A, Anagnostou P, Montinaro F, Capocasa M, et al. (2012) Mine, yours, ours? Sharing data on human genetic variation. PLoS ONE 7: e37552.
16. Drew BT, Gazis R, Cabezas P, Swithers KS, Deng J, et al. (2013) Lost branches on the tree of life. PLoS Biol 11: e1001636.
17. Savage C, Vickers A, (2009) Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS ONE 4: e7078.
18. Wolkovich EM, Regetz J, O'Connor MI, (2012) Advances in global change research require open science by individual researchers. Glob Change Biol 18: 2102-2110.
19. Piwowar HA, Vision TJ, Whitlock MC, (2011) Data archiving is a good investment. Nature 473: 285.
20. Stodden V, Borwein J, Bailey DH, (2013) 'Setting the default to reproducible' in computational science research. SIAM News 46: 4-6.
21. Duke CS, Porter JH, (2013) The ethics of data sharing and reuse in biology. BioScience 63: 483-489.
22. Fox JW (2013) The downside of data sharing: more false results. Available: http://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2013/07/17/the-downside-of-data-sharing-more-false-results/. Accessed 9 September 2013.
23. Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB, (2007) Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE 2: e308.
24. Piwowar H, (2013) Altmetrics: value all research products. Nature 493: 159.
25. Ingwersen P, Chavan V, (2011) Indicators for the Data Usage Index (DUI): an incentive for publishing primary biodiversity data through global information infrastructure. BMC Bioinformatics 12: S3.
26. Roche DG, Jennions MD, Binning SA, (2013) Data deposition: fees could damage public data archives. Nature 502: 171.
27. Gratten J, Wilson A, McRae A, Beraldi D, Visscher P, et al. (2010) No evidence for warming climate theory of coat colour change in Soay sheep: a comment on Maloney et al. Biol Lett 6: 678-679.
28. Maloney SK, Fuller A, Mitchell D, (2010) A warming climate remains a plausible hypothesis for the decrease in dark Soay sheep. Biol Lett 6: 680-681.
29. Nelson B, (2009) Data sharing: empty archives. Nature 461: 160-163.
30. Van Noorden R, (2013) Data-sharing: everything on display. Nature 500: 243-245.
31. Piwowar H, Vision TJ, (2013) Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ 1: e175.
32. Brown CT (2013) The cost of open science. Available: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/the-cost-of-open-science.html. Accessed 15 June 2013.
33. Dryad (2013) Joint Data Archiving Policy (JDAP). Available: http://datadryad.org/pages/jdap. Accessed 11 September 2013.
34. Vines TH, Andrew RL, Bock DG, Franklin MT, Gilbert KJ, et al. (2013) Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. FASEB J 27: 1304-1308.
35. Wykstra S (2013) Data access policies landscape. London: figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.827268
36. Roberts R (2013) Dude, where's my data? Available: http://blogs.plos.org/biologue/2013/09/04/dude-wheres-my-data/. San Francisco: PLoS Blogs. Accessed 11 September 2013.
37. Noor M, Zimmerman K, Teeter K, (2006) Data sharing: how much doesn't get submitted to GenBank? PLoS Biol 4: e228.
38. Alsheikh-Ali A, Qureshi W, Al-Mallah M, Ioannidis J, (2011) Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS ONE 6: e24357.
39. Ellwood ER, Temple SA, Primack RB, Bradley NL, Davis CC, (2013) Record-breaking early flowering in the eastern United States. PLoS ONE 8: e53788.
40. Page RDM (2013) "Lost branches on the tree of life"-why must the answer be enforcing behaviour? Available: http://iphylo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/branches-on-tree-of-life-why-must.html. Accessed 12 September 2013.
41. Baker C, (2013) Journal of Heredity adopts joint data archiving policy. J Hered 104: 1.
42. Vision TJ (2013) Embargo selections of Dryad data authors [data]. London: figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.805946.
43. Clutton-Brock T, Sheldon BC, (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 562-573.
44. Haff TM, Roche DG, Lanfear R, Binning SA, Schwanz LE, et al. (2013) Survey results for Rocheet al. PLoS Biology Troubleshooting public data archiving: suggestions to increase participation [data]. London: figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.811801.
45. Butler D, Cyranoski D, (2013) Flu papers spark row over credit for data. Nature 497: 14-15.
46. White EP, Baldridge E, Brym ZT, Locey KJ, McGlinn DJ, et al. (2013) Nine simple ways to make it easier to (re) use your data. PeerJ PrePrints 1: e7v2 doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.7v2.
47. Favaro B (2013) Authorship in the era of big data. Available: http://storify.com/brettfavaro/authorship-in-the-era-of-big-data. Accessed 9 September 2013.
48. Lortie C (2013) A proposed policy for data reuse recognition. London: figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.759711.
49. Creative Commons (2013) CC0 use for data. Available: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0_use_for_data. Accessed 24 September 2013.
50. Mietchen D (2012) Attribution stacking as a barrier to reuse. Available: http://wir.okfn.org/2012/01/27/attribution-stacking-as-a-barrier-to-reuse. Accessed 9 September 2013.
51. Byrnes J (2013) An open letter to ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, and SciVerse Scopus. London: figshare. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.809563.
52. Viney I, (2013) Altmetrics: research council responds. Nature 494: 176.
53. (2013) San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Available: http://am.ascb.org/dora/. Accessed 11 September 2013.