Faecal incontinence: Standardizing outcome measures

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 156-158

  Vaizey, C J ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FECES INCONTINENCE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION; SCORING SYSTEM; WEXNER SCORE;

FECAL INCONTINENCE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 84893730172     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12566     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hultén L, Angerås U, Scaglia M, Delbro D. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or acupuncture for the treatment for fecal incontinence: a clinical commentary. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17: 589-92.
2. Maeda Y, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence at 5 Years. Ann Surg 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
3. Moya P, Arroyo A, Lacueva J et al. Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18: 179-85.
4. Iachetta RP, Cola A, Villani RD. Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence - the experience of a pelvic floor center: short term results. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 189-92 Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5. George AT, Kalmar K, Panarese A, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ. Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 302-6.
6. Boyle DJ, Murphy J, Gooneratne ML et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1271-8.
7. Damon H, Barth X, Roman S, Mion F. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients. J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 227-33.
8. Pascual I, Gómez Cde C, Ortega R et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2011; 103: 355-9.
9. Straka RJ, Fish JT, Benson SR, Suh JT. Patient self-reporting of compliance does not correspond with electronic monitoring: an evaluation using isosorbide dinitrate as a model drug. Pharmacotherapy 1997; 17: 126-32.
10. Schmit KM, Coeytaux RR, Goode AP et al. Evaluating cough assessment tools: a systematic review. Chest 2013; 144: 1819-26.
11. Given JE, O'Kane MJ, Bunting BP, Coates VE. Comparing patient-generated blood glucose diary records with meter memory in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2013; 30: 901-13.
12. Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD, Harezlak J, Craig D. The feasibility of cell phone based electronic diaries for STI/HIV research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012Jun; 12: 75.
13. Browning GG, Parks AG. Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 101-4.
14. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 482-7.
15. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97. Review.
16. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77-80.
17. Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, Marosszeky N. The revised faecal incontinence scale: a clinical validation of a new, short measure for assessment and outcomes evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 652-9.
18. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL. Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ-B. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1235-50.
19. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJ et al. What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 67-71.
20. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000; 355: 260-5.
21. Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 345-8.
22. Mellgren A, Wexner SD, Coller JA et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1065-75.
23. Zutshi M, Tracey TH, Bast J, Halverson A, Na J. Ten-year outcome after anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1089-94.
24. Macefield RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM. Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013; doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1136-8. [Epub ahead of print].
25. Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, Donisi L, De Simone V, Zaccone G. Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence associated with an anal sphincter lesion: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e297-304.
26. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 9-16; discussion 16-7.
27. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
28. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-43.
29. Minguez M, Garrigues V, Soria MJ, Andreu M, Mearin F, Clave P. Adaptation to Spanish language and validation of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 490-9.