Selective removal of SO2 over tertiary amine-containing materials

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 240, Issue , 2014, Pages 462-468

  Tailor, Ritesh ^a   Ahmadalinezhad, Asieh ^a   Sayari, Abdelhamid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Pore expanded MCM 41; Reversible SO2 adsorption; Selective SO2 adsorption; Tertiary amine

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; CHARGE TRANSFER COMPLEX; MESOPOROUS SILICA; PORE-EXPANDED MCM-41; PRESENCE OF WATER; SELECTIVE ADSORPTION; SELECTIVE REMOVAL; TERTIARY AMINE;

ADSORPTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; MESOPOROUS MATERIALS;

SULFUR DIOXIDE;

EID: 84893705616     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. E.I.A., International Energy Outlook 2008 Report, US Department of Energy Washington, DC, 2008,http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/0484(2008).pdf.
2. 2/Hg removal from flue gas by dry FGD. Int. J. Mining Sci. Technol. 2012, 22:107-110.
3. Hansen B.B., Fogh F., Knudsen N.O., Kiil S. Performance of a wet flue gas desulfurization pilot plant under oxy-fuel conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:4238-4244.
4. Tang Z.-G., Zhou C.-C., Chen C. Studies on flue gas desulfurization by chemical absorption using an ethylenediamine-phosphoric acid solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43:6714-6722.
5. van Dam M.H.H., Lamine A.S., Roizard D., Lochon P., Roizard C. Selective sulfur dioxide removal using organic solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36:4628-4637.
6. E.P.D.J. Kubek, F.P. Wilcher, Purification and recovery options for gasification, UOP report, Des Plaines, IL, 2000, http://opac.tistr.or.th/Multimedia/Web/0049/wb0049947.pdf.
7. 2 capture by guanidinium-based ionic liquids: a theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115:3466-3477.
8. Ren S., Hou Y., Tian S., Wu W., Liu W. Deactivation and regeneration of an ionic liquid during desulfurization of simulated flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:3425-3429.
9. 2 absorbed by an ionic liquid during desulfurization of simulated flue gases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 50:998-1002.
10. 2 capture by tunable azole-based ionic liquids through multiple-site chemical absorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:11916-11919.
11. x. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176:1093-1096.
12. Karatepe N., Orbak İ., Yavuz R., Özyuǧuran A. Sulfur dioxide adsorption by activated carbons having different textural and chemical properties. Fuel 2008, 87:3207-3215.
13. 3. Chemosphere 2006, 62:823-826.
14. 2 capture and attrition characteristics of a CaO/bio-based sorbent. Fuel 2012, 93:258-263.
15. 2 removal from flue gases. 3. Long-term durability. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 51:213-217.
16. Ivanova E., Koumanova B. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on natural clinoptilolite chemically modified with salt solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167:306-312.
17. 2 on zeolites FAU and LTA. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 203-204:111-117.
18. Gupta A., Gaur V., Verma N. Breakthrough analysis for adsorption of sulfur-dioxide over zeolites. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2004, 43:9-22.
19. 2 capture based on a polyethylene glycol-loaded mesoporous molecular sieve. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2:878-882.
20. Guo J.-X., Liang J., Chu Y.-H., Sun M.-C., Yin H.-Q., Li J.-J. Desulfurization activity of nickel supported on acid-treated activated carbons. Appl. Catal., A 2012, 421-422:142-147.
21. 2 from gas streams. Fuel Process. Technol. 2012, 99:35-42.
22. Yang S., Sun J., Ramirez-Cuesta A.J., Callear S.K., David W.I.F., Anderson D.P., Newby R., Blake A.J., Parker J.E., Tang C.C., Schroeder M. Selectivity and direct visualization of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide in a decorated porous host. Nature Chem. 2012, 4:887-894.
23. Fernandez C.A., Thallapally P.K., Motkuri R.K., Nune S.K., Sumrak J.C., Tian J., Liu J. Gas-induced expansion and contraction of a fluorinated metal-organic framework. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10:1037-1039.
24. x over activated carbon fibers. Carbon 2000, 38:227-239.
25. 2 from flue gas: a review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40:321-348.
26. 2 capture from power plant flue gas streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:2558-2566.
27. Bollini P., Didas S.A., Jones C.W. Amine-oxide hybrid materials for acid gas separations. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21:15100-15120.
28. 2 capture. Energy Fuels 2006, 20:1514-1520.
29. x. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1994, 53:857-875.
30. D.L. Klass, J.R. Conrad, Removal of sulfur dioxide from waste gas, US4208387, 1980.
31. 2 from flue gas on triethanolamine-modified large pore SBA-15. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:8698-8702.
32. 2 Deactivation of supported amines: does the nature of amine matter?. Langmuir 2012, 28:4241-4247.
33. 2 adsorption over a wide range of conditions. Adsorption 2009, 15:318-328.
34. 2 dynamic and equilibrium adsorption performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:446-458.
35. 2 adsorbents in the presence of oxygen-containing gases. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 145:146-149.
36. Leontiev A.V., Rudkevich D.M. Revisiting noncovalent SO2-amine chemistry: an indicator-displacement assay for colorimetric detection of SO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127:14126-14127.
37. 2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98:7617-7620.
38. Oh J.J., LaBarge M.S., Matos J., Kampf J.W., Hillig K.W., Kuczkowski R.L. Structure of the trimethylamine-sulfur dioxide complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113:4732-4738.
39. 2 adsorption on polysiloxane layers containing tertiary amino groups. J. Struct. Chem. 1996, 37:142-145.
40. 2 capture by dual functionalized ionic liquids through a combination of chemical and physical absorption. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:2633-2635.
41. Sass C.S., Ault B.S. Matrix isolation infrared spectroscopic study of sulfur dioxide-amine complexes. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88:432-440.
42. Vchirawongkwin V., Pornpiganon C., Kritayakornupong C., Tongraar A., Rode B.M. The stability of bisulfite and sulfonate ions in aqueous solution characterized by hydration structure and dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116:11498-11507.