DFLAT: Functional annotation for human development

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Wick, Heather C ^a   Drabkin, Harold ^b   Ngu, Huy ^a   Sackman, Michael ^a   Fournier, Craig ^a,c   Haggett, Jessica ^a   Blake, Judith A ^b   Bianchi, Diana W ^c,d   Slonim, Donna K ^a,c  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Databases; Fetal; Functional annotation; Gene function; Gene set analysis; Human development; Neonatal

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; FETUS DISEASE; GENE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NEWBORN; PHYSIOLOGY;

AMNIOTIC FLUID; DATABASES, GENETIC; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FETAL DISEASES; GENES; GENOMICS; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84893701540     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-45     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. Eur J Epidemiol 2003, 18(8):733-736.
2. Calkins K, Devaskar SU. Fetal origins of adult disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2011, 41(6):158-176. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2011.01.001, 21684471.
3. Sood R, et al. Gene expression patterns in human placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(14):5478-5483. 10.1073/pnas.0508035103, 1414632, 16567644.
4. Hui L, et al. The amniotic fluid transcriptome: a source of novel information about human fetal development. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 119(1):111-118. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d4150, 3273331, 22183218.
5. Larrabee PB, et al. Global gene expression analysis of the living human fetus using cell-free messenger RNA in amniotic fluid. JAMA 2005, 293(7):836-842. 10.1001/jama.293.7.836, 15713773.
6. Maron JL, et al. Gene expression analysis in pregnant women and their infants identifies unique fetal biomarkers that circulate in maternal blood. J Clin Invest 2007, 117(10):3007-3019. 10.1172/JCI29959, 1978418, 17885688.
7. Slonim DK, Yanai I. Getting started in gene expression microarray analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5(10):e1000543. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000543, 2762517, 19876380.
8. Curtis RK, Oresic M, Vidal-Puig A. Pathways to the analysis of microarray data. Trends Biotechnol 2005, 23(8):429-435. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.05.011, 15950303.
9. Khatri P, Draghici S. Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(18):3587-3595. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti565, 2435250, 15994189.
10. Rebbeck TR, Spitz M, Wu X. Assessing the function of genetic variants in candidate gene association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(8):589-597. 10.1038/nrg1403, 15266341.
11. Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(43):15545-15550. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102, 1239896, 16199517.
12. Tian L, et al. Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(38):13544-13549. 10.1073/pnas.0506577102, 1200092, 16174746.
13. Efron B, Tibshirani R. On testing the significance of sets of genes. Annals of Applied Statistics 2007, 1(1):107-129.
14. Torkamani A, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. Pathway analysis of seven common diseases assessed by genome-wide association. Genomics 2008, 92(5):265-272. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.011, 2602835, 18722519.
15. Tarca AL, et al. Down-weighting overlapping genes improves gene set analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13:136. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-136, 3443069, 22713124.
16. Turcan S, et al. Mining functionally relevant gene sets for analyzing physiologically novel clinical expression data. Pac Symp Biocomput 2011, 50:61.
17. Gene Ontology Consortium Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000, 25(1):25-29. 10.1038/75556, 3037419, 10802651, Gene Ontology Consortium.
18. Falcon S, Gentleman R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(2):257-258. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl567, 17098774.
19. Khatri P, et al. Profiling gene expression using onto-express. Genomics 2002, 79(2):266-270. 10.1006/geno.2002.6698, 11829497.
20. Dennis G, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 2003, 4(5):P3. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3, 3720094, 12734009.
21. Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology in 2010: extensions and refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Database issue):D331-D335. 2808930, 19920128, Gene Ontology Consortium.
22. Khodiyar VK, et al. The representation of heart development in the gene ontology. Dev Biol 2011, 354(1):9-17. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.011, 3302178, 21419760.
23. Anderson KV, Ingham PW. The transformation of the model organism: a decade of developmental genetics. Nat Genet 2003, 33(Suppl):285-293.
24. Huelsken J, Birchmeier W. New aspects of Wnt signaling pathways in higher vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001, 11(5):547-553. 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00231-8, 11532397.
25. Taylor MV. Comparison of Muscle Development in Drosophila and Vertebrates., in Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet] 2000, Landes Bioscience: Austin (TX).
26. Armit C, et al. eMouseAtlas, EMAGE, and the spatial dimension of the transcriptome. Mamm Genome 2012, 23(9-10):514-524. 3463796, 22847374.
27. Richardson L, et al. EMAGE: Electronic Mouse Atlas of Gene Expression. Methods Mol Biol 2014, 1092:61-79. 10.1007/978-1-60327-292-6_5, 24318814.
28. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) UniProt Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42(1):D191-D198. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt).
29. Gene Ontology Consortium GO Annotation Policies and Guidelines. 1999-2013 Available from: http://www.geneontology.org/GO.annotation.shtml; see also http://www.geneontology.org/GO.annotation.SOP.shtml?all - literature, Gene Ontology Consortium.
30. Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology: enhancements for 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(Database issue):D559-D564. 3245151, 22102568, Gene Ontology Consortium.
31. Thomas R, et al. LGI1 is a Nogo receptor 1 ligand that antagonizes myelin-based growth inhibition. J Neurosci 2010, 30(19):6607-6612. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5147-09.2010, 20463223.
32. NCBI Resource Coordinators Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41(Database issue):D8-D20. 3531099, 23193264, NCBI Resource Coordinators.
33. O'Rahilly R. Early human development and the chief sources of information on staged human embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1979, 9(4):273-280. 10.1016/0028-2243(79)90068-6, 400868.
34. Wessels A, Sedmera D. Developmental anatomy of the heart: a tale of mice and man. Physiol Genomics 2003, 15(3):165-176.
35. Clancy B, et al. Extrapolating brain development from experimental species to humans. Neurotoxicology 2007, 28(5):931-937. 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.01.014, 2077812, 17368774.
36. Theiler K. Stage 27: Newborn Mouse, in The House Mouse: Atlas of Mouse Development 1989, New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Igarashi Y, Ishii T. Embryonic development of the human organ of Corti: electron microscopic study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1980, 2(1):51-62. 10.1016/0165-5876(80)90028-2, 7188054.
38. Subramanian A, et al. GSEA-P: a desktop application for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(23):3251-3253. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm369, 17644558.
39. Slonim DK, et al. Functional genomic analysis of amniotic fluid cell-free mRNA suggests that oxidative stress is significant in Down syndrome fetuses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106(23):9425-9429. 10.1073/pnas.0903909106, 2687148, 19474297.
40. Koide K, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of cell-free fetal RNA suggests a specific molecular phenotype in trisomy 18. Hum Genet 2011, 129(3):295-305. 10.1007/s00439-010-0923-3, 3206603, 21152935.
41. Pietrzyk JJ, et al. The use of microarrays for gene expression analysis in premature children--new strategy of searching for genetic basis of late complications of prematurity--preliminary research. Przegl Lek 2011, 68(1):44-46.
42. Bourquin JP, et al. Identification of distinct molecular phenotypes in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(9):3339-3344. 10.1073/pnas.0511150103, 1413912, 16492768.
43. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(13):1600-1607. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140, 16606683.
44. Goeman JJ, Mansmann U. Multiple testing on the directed acyclic graph of gene ontology. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(4):537-544. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm628, 18203773.
45. Alam-Faruque Y, et al. The impact of focused Gene Ontology curation of specific mammalian systems. PLoS One 2011, 6(12):e27541. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027541, 3235096, 22174742.
46. Nyberg DA, Souter VL. Sonographic markers of fetal trisomies: second trimester. J Ultrasound Med 2001, 20(6):655-674.
47. Ferreira AF, et al. Posterior brain in fetuses with trisomy 18, trisomy 13 and triploidy at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation. Prenat Diagn 2012, 32(9):854-858.
48. Seok J, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110(9):3507-3512. 10.1073/pnas.1222878110, 3587220, 23401516.
49. Cauwels A, Vandendriessche B, Brouckaert P. Of mice, men, and inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110(34):E3150. 10.1073/pnas.1308333110, 23852732.
50. Osterburg AR, et al. Concerns over interspecies transcriptional comparisons in mice and humans after trauma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110(36):E3370. 10.1073/pnas.1306033110, 23847210.
51. Tompkins RG, et al. Reply to Osterburg et al: To study human inflammatory diseases in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110(36):E3371. 10.1073/pnas.1307452110, 24137798.
52. Warren HS, et al. Reply to Cauwels et al.: Of men, not mice, and inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110(34):E3151. 10.1073/pnas.1308943110, 24137663.
53. Sissman NJ. Developmental landmarks in cardiac morphogenesis: comparative chronology. Am J Cardiol 1970, 25(2):141-148. 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90575-8, 5413193.
54. Idaghdour Y, Awadalla P. Exploiting gene expression variation to capture gene-environment interactions for disease. Front Genet 2012, 3:228. 3668192, 23755064.
55. Ashoor G, et al. Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell-free DNA at 11-13 weeks' gestation: relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013, 41(1):26-32. 10.1002/uog.12331, 23108725.
56. Bianchi DW, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 119(5):890-901. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824fb482, 22362253.
57. Talkowski ME, et al. Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample. N Engl J Med 2012, 367(23):2226-2232. 10.1056/NEJMoa1208594, 3579222, 23215558.
58. Snyder MW, et al. Noninvasive fetal genome sequencing: a primer. Prenat Diagn 2013, 33(6):547-554. 10.1002/pd.4097, 3727971, 23553552.