Carotid stenting: Is there an operator effect? A pooled analysis from the carotid stenting trialists' collaboration

Stroke

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 527-532

  Calvet, David ^a   Mas, Jean Louis ^a   Algra, Ale ^b   Becquemin, Jean Pierre ^c   Bonati, Leo H ^d,e   Dobson, Joanna ^f   Fraedrich, Gustav ^g   Jansen, Olav ^h   Mali, Willem P ^b   Ringleb, Peter A ⁱ   Chatellier, Gilles ^j   Brown, Martin M ^e   Bonneville, J F ^k   Branchereau, A ^k   Crochet, D ^k   Gaux, J C ^k   Larrue, V ^k   Leys, D ^k   Watelet, J ^k   Hacke, W ^k   Hennerici, M ^k   Allenberg, J R ^k   Maurer, P C ^k   Eckstein, H H ^k   Zeumer, H ^k   Bamford, J ^k   Beard, J ^k   Bland, M ^k   Bradbury, A W ^k   Clifton, A ^k   Gaines, P ^k   Halliday, A ^k   Malik, I ^k   McGuire, A J ^k   Sidhu, P ^k   Venables, G ^k   more..

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER SAINTE ANNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^g INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^j HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^k NONE

more..

Author keywords

Carotid stenosis; Carotid stenting; Prevention

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROSURGEON; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; WORK EXPERIENCE;

CAROTID STENOSIS; CAROTID STENTING; PREVENTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID STENOSIS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893693684     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003526     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A, Branchereau A, Chatellier G, Fraedrich G, et al. Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2010;376:1062-1073.
2. Rosenfield K, Babb JD, Cates CU, Cowley MJ, Feldman T, Gallagher A, et al. Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting-multispecialty consensus recommendations: a report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:165-174.
3. Connors JJ III, Sacks D, Furlan AJ, Selman WR, Russell EJ, Stieg PE, et al. Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Neurology. 2005;64:190-198.
4. Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE Jr, Cates CU, Duckwiler GR, Feldman TE et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:126-170.
5. Naylor AR, Rothwell PM, Bell PR. Overview of the principal results and secondary analyses from the European and North American randomised trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:115-129.
6. Featherstone RL, Brown MM, Coward LJ; ICSS Investigators. International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18:69-74.
7. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B; EVA-3S Investigators. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke. 2004;35:e18-e20.
8. Ringleb PA, Kunze A, Allenberg JR, Hennerici MG, Jansen O, Maurer PC, et al; Steering Committee of the SPACE Study. The Stent-Supported Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery vs. Endarterectomy Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18:66-68.
9. Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, Bonati LH, van der Worp HB, de Borst GJ, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:985-997.
10. Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, Brückmann H. Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke. 2009;40:841-846.
11. Howard VJ, Lutsep HL, Mackey A, Demaerschalk BM, Sam AD II, Gonzales NR, et al; CREST Investigators. Influence of sex on outcomes of stenting versus endarterectomy: a subgroup analysis of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:530-537.
12. Touzé E, Trinquart L, Chatellier G, Mas JL. Systematic review of the perioperative risks of stroke or death after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke. 2009;40:e683-e693.
13. Urbach DR, Austin PC. Conventional models overestimate the statistical significance of volume-outcome associations, compared with multilevel models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:391-400.
14. Hopkins LN, Roubin GS, Chakhtoura EY, Gray WA, Ferguson RD, Katzen BT, et al. The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19:153-162.
15. Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P, Scicli A, Fairman R, Wholey M, et al. The CAPTURE Registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:341-348.
16. Nallamothu BK, Gurm HS, Ting HH, Goodney PP, Rogers MA, Curtis JP, et al. Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2011;306:1338-1343.
17. Gray WA, Rosenfield KA, Jaff MR, Chaturvedi S, Peng L, Verta P; CAPTURE 2 Investigators and Executive Committee. Influence of site and operator characteristics on carotid artery stent outcomes: analysis of the CAPTURE 2 (Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events) clinical study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:235-246.
18. Lin PH, Bush RL, Peden EK, Zhou W, Guerrero M, Henao EA, et al. Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg. 2005;190:850-857.
19. Fiehler J, Jansen O, Berger J, Eckstein HH, Ringleb PA, Stingele R. Differences in complication rates among the centres in the SPACE study. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:1049-1053.
20. Gray WA, Simonton CA, Verta P. Overview of the 2011 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel meeting on the ACCULINK and ACCUNET Carotid Artery Stent System. Circulation. 2012;125:2256-2264.