Coronary computed tomography angiography-Adapted Leaman score as a tool to noninvasively quantify total coronary atherosclerotic burden

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1575-1584

  De Araújo Gonçalves, Pedro ^a,b,c   Garcia Garcia, Hector M ^d   Dores, Helder ^a   Carvalho, Maria Salomé ^a   Sousa, Pedro Jerónimo ^a   Marques, Hugo ^b   Ferreira, Antonio ^a,b   Cardim, Nuno ^b   Teles, Rui Campante ^a   Raposo, Luís ^a   Gabriel, Henrique Mesquita ^a   Almeida, Manuel Sousa ^a   Aleixo, Ana ^a,c   Carmo, Miguel Mota ^c   Machado, Francisco Pereira ^b   Mendes, Miguel ^a  

^a Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental   (Portugal)

^b HOSPITAL DA LUZ   (Portugal)

^c CEDOC   (Portugal)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Atherosclerotic burden; CCTA; Coronary artery disease; Risk scores

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEARTSCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEAMAN SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORISE SCORE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; PORTUGAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84893638980     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0232-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K et al (2009) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119(3):480-486
2. Braunwald E (2006) Epilogue: what do clinicians expect from imagers? J Am Coll Cardiol 47(8 Suppl):C101-C103
3. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, Pugliese F, Weustink AC, van Pelt N et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(15):1469-1475
4. Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Neefjes LA, van Straten M, Neoh E, Kyrzopoulos S et al (2009) Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk. Radiology 252(1):53-60
5. Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, Chen L, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M et al (2011) Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COro-Nary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):463-472
6. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(12):1161-1170
7. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M et al (2012) European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): the Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 33(13):1635-1701
8. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) Diabetes Care 20(7):1183-1197
9. Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A (2001) Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA 285(19):2486-2497
10. European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines C (2003) 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 21(6):1011-1053
11. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, Cao F, Brazaitis M, O?Malley PG (2005) Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(5):807-814
12. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Nieman K et al (2011) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 32(11):1316-1330
13. Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D (1997) Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 102(4):350-356
14. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122-136
15. Leaman DM, Brower RW, Meester GT, Serruys P, van den Brand M (1981) Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of the disease, severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function. Circulation 63(2):285-299
16. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, Nakano M, Otsuka F, Stolzmann P et al (2012) The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5(12):1243-1252
17. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Antonioli L et al (2012) A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5(7):690-701
18. Little WC, Downes TR, Applegate RJ (1991) The underlying coronary lesion in myocardial infarction: implications for coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 14(11):868-874
19. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V (1995) Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 92(3):657-671
20. Libby P, Theroux P (2005) Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation 111(25):3481-3488
21. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J et al (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation 108(14):1664-1672
22. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS et al (2011) A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 364(3):226-235
23. Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Hoffmann V, Achenbach S, Nikolaou K, Conen D et al (2011) Meta-Analysis and systematic review of the long-term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(24):2426-2436
24. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K et al (2005) The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1(2):219-227
25. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-Artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360(10):961-972
26. Brito J, Teles R, Almeida M, de Araujo Goncalves P, Raposo L, Sousa P et al (2011) Predictive value of SYNTAX score in risk stratification of patients undergoing unprotected left main coronary artery angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 23(12):494-499
27. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM (2000) Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20(5):1262-1275
28. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Sarno G, Vanhoenacker PK et al (2008) Head-to-head comparison of coronary plaque evaluation between multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(2):176-182
29. Morise AP, Jalisi F (2003) Evaluation of pretest and exercise test scores to assess all-cause mortality in unselected patients presenting for exercise testing with symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 42(5):842-850
30. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O?Gara P et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864-1894