Fixed point sensitivity analysis of interacting structured populations

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 92, Issue , 2014, Pages 97-106

  Barabás, György ^a   Meszéna, Géza ^b   Ostling, Annette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Coexistence; Matrix models; Robustness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COEXISTENCE; EIGENVALUE; JUVENILE; NICHE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION ECOLOGY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; COEXISTENCE; MATRIX MODELS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; ROBUSTNESS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COEXISTENCE; MATRIX MODELS; ROBUSTNESS;

MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84893613311     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barabás G., Meszéna G., Ostling A. Community robustness and limiting similarity in periodic environments. Theoret. Ecol. 2012, 5:265-282.
2. Barabás G., Ostling A. Community robustness in discrete-time periodic environments. Ecol. Complexity. 2013, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.001.
3. Caswell H. Optimal life histories and the age-specific costs of reproduction. J. Theoret. Biol. 1982, 98:519-529.
4. Caswell H. Optimal life histories and age-specific costs of reproduction: two extensions. J. Theoret. Biol. 1984, 107:169-172.
5. Caswell H. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation 2001, Sinauer Associates. second ed.
6. Caswell H. Sensitivity analysis of transient population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:1-15.
7. Caswell H. Perturbation analysis of nonlinear matrix population models. Demographic Res. 2008, 18:59-115.
8. Caswell H. Matrix models and sensitivity analysis of populations classified by age and stage: a vec-permutation matrix approach. Theoret. Ecol. 2011, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12080-011-0132-2.
9. Caswell H., Naiman R., Morin R. Evaluating the consequences of reproduction in complex salmonid life cycles. Aquaculture 1984, 43:123-143.
10. Caswell H., Takada T., Hunter C.M. Sensitivity analysis of equilibrium in density-dependent matrix population models. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:380-387.
11. Chase J.M., Leibold M.A. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches 2003, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Chesson P. A need for niches?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1991, 6(1):26-28.
13. Chesson P. Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 1994, 45:227-276.
14. Chesson P. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 2000, 58:211-237.
15. Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000, 31:343-366.
16. Chesson P. Scale transition theory with special reference to species coexistence in a variable environment. J. Biol. Dyn. 2009, 3:149-163.
17. Chesson P., Huntly N. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Amer. Natur. 1997, 150(5):519-553.
18. Chesson P., Warner R.R. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. Amer. Natur. 1981, 117:923-943.
19. Christiansen F.B., Fenchel T.M. Theories of Populations in Biological Communities 1977, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Crouse D.T., Crowder L.B., Caswell H. A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 1987, 68:1412-1423.
21. de Kroon H., van Groenendael J., Ehrlén J. Elasticities: a review of methods and model limitations. Ecology 2000, 81:607-618.
22. Elton C. Animal Ecology 1927, Sidwick and Jackson, London.
23. Forsman E.D., DeStefano M.G., Raphael M.G., Gutiérrez R.J. Demography of the Northern Spotted Owl. Studies in Avian Biology 1996, vol. 17. Cooper Ornithological Society, Camarillo, California, USA.
24. Franco M., Silvertown J. Life history variation in plants: an exploration of the fast-slow continuum hypothesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1996, 351:1341-1348.
25. Fujiwara M., Caswell H. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature 2001, 414:537-541.
26. Fujiwara M., Pfeiffer G., Boggess M., Walton J. Coexistence of Competing Stage-Structured Populations. Scientific Reports 2011, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00107.
27. Gleeson S.K. Medawar's theory of senescence. J. Theoret. Biol. 1984, 108:475-479.
28. Grant A., Benton T.G. Elastcity analysis for density-dependent populations in stochastic environments. Ecology 2000, 81:680-693.
29. Grant A., Benton T.G. Density-dependent populations require density-dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the lpa model of tribolium. J. Animal Ecol. 2003, 72:94-105.
30. Grinnell J. The account of the mammals and birds of the lower colorado valley. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 1914, 12:51-294.
31. Hamilton W.D. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J. Theoret. Biol. 1966, 12:12-45.
32. Hardin G. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 1960, 131:1292-1297.
33. Hunter C.M., Caswell H., Runge M.C., Regehr E.V., Amstrup S.C., Stirling I. Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis. Ecology 2010, 91:2883-2898.
34. Hutchinson G.E. An Introduction to Population Ecology 1978, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
35. Leibold M.A. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 1995, 76(5):1371-1382.
36. Levin S.A. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Amer. Natur. 1970, 104:413-423.
37. Levins R. Qualitative analysis of partially specified systems. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1974, 231:123-138.
38. MacArthur R.H., Levins R. Limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Amer. Natur. 1967, 101(921):377-385.
39. Mesterton-Gibbons M. Why demographic elasticities sum to one: a postscript to De Kroon et al. Ecology 1993, 74:2467-2468.
40. Meszéna G., Gyllenberg M., Pásztor L., Metz J.A.J. Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 2006, 69:68-87.
41. Moll J.D., Brown J.S. Competition and coexistence with multiple life-history stages. Amer. Natur. 2008, 171:839-843.
42. Noon B.R., McKelvey K.S. Management of the spotted owl: a case history in conservation biology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1996, 27:135-162.
43. Seamans M.E., Gutiérrez R.J., May C.A., Peery M.Z. Demography of two Mexican spotted owl populations. Cons. Biol. 1999, 13:744-754.
44. Silvertown J., Franco M., McConway K. A demographic interpretation of grime's triangle. Funct. Ecol. 1992, 6:130-136.
45. Silvertown J., Franco M., Menges E. Interpretation of elasticity matrices as an aid to management of plant populations of conservation. Cons. Biol. 1993, 10:591-597.
46. Snyder R.E., Chesson P. How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence. Amer. Natur. 2004, 164:633-650.
47. Szilágyi A., Meszéna G. Limiting similarity and niche theory for structured populations. J. Theoret. Biol. 2009, 258:27-37.
48. Szilágyi A., Meszéna G. Two-patch model of spatial niche segregation. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23:187-205.
49. Szilágyi A., Meszéna G. Coexistence in a fluctuating environment by the effect of relative nonlinearity: a minimal model. J. Theoret. Biol. 2010, 267:502-512.
50. Takada T., Nakajima H. An analysis of life history evolution in terms of the density-dependent lefkovitch matrix model. Math. Biosci. 1992, 112:155-176.
51. Takada T., Nakajima H. Theorems on the invasion process in stage-structured populations with density-dependent dynamics. J. Math. Biol. 1998, 36:497-514.
52. Templeton A.R. The evolution of life histories under pleiotropic constraints and r-selection. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 1980, 18:279-289.
53. Turchin P. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
54. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:393-425.