The arbitrator and the law: Does He/She know it? Apply It? How? And a few more questions

Arbitration International

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 631-638

  Kaufmann Kohler, Gabrielle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893607100     PISSN: 09570411     EISSN: 18758398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/21.4.631     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Julian D. M. Lew, 'Proof of Applicable Law' in Klaus Peter Berger, Werner F. Ebke, Siegfriend Elsing, Bernhard GrolBfeld and Gunther Kuhne (eds), International Commercial Arbitration, Festschrift fir Otto Sandrock zum 70 Geburtstag (Heidelberg, 2000), pp. 581-601
2. Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, 'Iura novit arbiter. Est-ce bien raisonnable?' in Anne Heritier Lachat and Laurent Hirsch (eds), De Lege Ferenda: Reflexions sur le droit desirable en I'honneur du Professeur Alain Hirsch (Editions Slatkine, Geneva, 2004), pp. 71-78
3. Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, 'Globalization of Arbitral Procedure' in (2003) 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1313
4. Julian D. M. Lew, Loukas A. Stelis and Stefan M. Kroell, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2003), pp. 440-445
5. Axel Baum, 'Reconciling Anglo-Saxon and Civil Law Procedure: The Path to a Procedural Lex Arbitrationis' in Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century, Liber Amicorum Karl-Heinz Bbckstiegel (Cologne/Berlin/Bonn/Munich, 2001), pp. 21-30
6. Christian Boris, 'The Reconciliation of Conflicts Between Common Law and Civil Law Principles in the Arbitration Process' in Stefan N. Frommel and Barry A.K. Rider (eds), Conflicting Legal Cultures in Commercial Arbitration (The Hague, 1999), pp. 1-18
7. Peter S. Caldwell, 'Arbitration Procedures: Harmonization of Basic Notions: Differing Approaches' in Globalization and Harmonization of the Basic Notions in International Arbitration (IFCAI Conference, Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, 1996), pp. 101-103
8. Siegfried H. Elsing and John M. Townsend, 'Bridging the Common Law: Civil Law Divide in Arbitration' in (2002) 18(1) Arbitration International 59
9. Andreas Lowenfeld, 'International Arbitration as an Omelette: What Goes into the Mix' in Frommel and Rider, supra, pp. 19-30
10. Jan Paulsson, 'Arbitration Procedures: Harmonization of Basic Notions: Differing Approaches' in Globalization and Harmonization of the Basic Motions in International Arbitration, supra, pp. 76-87
11. Klaus Peter Berger, International Economic Arbitration (Deventer, Boston, 1993), pp. 582-588
12. Marcus S. Jacob, 'The Adversarial v. Inquisitorial Principles of Dispute Resolution Within the Context of International Commercial Arbitration' in (2001) 16(12)
13. Richard Fentiman, Foreign Law in English Courts: Pleading, Proof and Choice of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998)
14. Trevor C. Hartley, 'Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law: The Major European Systems Compared' in (1996) 45(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 271
15. Louise Ellen Teitz, Transnational Litigation (Michie Law Publishers, Charlottesville, 1996), pp. 205-232
16. Louise E. Teitz, 'From the Courthouse in Tobago to the Internet: The Increasing Need to Prove Foreign Law in U.S. Courts' in (2003) 34(1) Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 97