Internet of Things Forensics: Challenges and approaches

Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, COLLABORATECOM 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 608-615

  Oriwoh, Edewede ^a   Jazani, David ^a   Epiphaniou, Gregory ^a   Sant, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b University Campus Milton Keynes ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

digital forensics; Internet of Things; model; security

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL FORENSIC; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); SECURITY;

ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; MODELS;

INTERNET;

EID: 84893605482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2013.254159     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Solomon, E. Lattimore (n.d). Computer Forensics [ONLINE]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.84.9392&r ep=rep1&type=pdf.
2. P. Jain, A. Noor and V. K. Sharma, "Internet of Things - An Introduction," Fourth Annual Seminar of CDAC Noida Technologies (ASCNT-2011), 2011.
3. J. M. Hernández-Muñoz, J. B. Vercher, L. Muñoz, J. A. Galache, M. Presser, L. A. H. Gómez and J. Pettersson, "Smart cities at the forefront of the future internet," in The Future InternetAnonymous Springer, 2011, pp. 447-462.
4. Bradley, J., Barbier, J., Handler, D., "Embracing the internet of everything to capture your share of $14.4 trillion: more relevant, valuable connections will improve innovation, productivity, efficiency & customer experience " 2013.
5. H. Bos, S. Ioannidis, E. Jonsson, E. Kirda and C. Kruegel, "Future threats to future trust," in Future of Trust in ComputingAnonymous Springer, 2009, pp. 49-54.
6. M. Friedewald, E. Vildjiounaite, Y. Punie and D. Wright, "Privacy, identity and security in ambient intelligence: A scenario analysis," Telematics Inf., vol. 24, pp. 15-29, 2, 2007.
7. M. Dlamini, M. Eloff and J. Eloff, "Internet of things: Emerging and future scenarios from an information security perspective," in 2009, .
8. Y. Yusoff, R. Ismail and Z. Hassan, "Common Phases of Computer Forensics Investigation Models," International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, vol. 3, 2011.
9. Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), 7Safe. (). Good Practice Guide for Computer-Based Electronic Evidence: Official Release version [ONLINE]. Available: http://www.7safe.com/electronic-evidence/ACPO-guidelines-compu ter-evidence.pdf.
10. The Federal Bureau of Investigation. (April 2000). Forensic Science Communications - Digital Evidence: Standards and Principles by SWGDE and and IOCE [ONLINE]. Available: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/forensic- sciencecommunications/fsc/april2000/swgde.htm/.
11. K. Vlachopoulos, E. Magkos and V. Chrissikopoulos, "A model for hybrid evidence investigation," Emerging Digital Forensics Applications for Crime Detection, Prevention, and Security, pp. 150, 2013.
12. A. Induruwa, "Hidden in the clouds: The impact on data security and forensic investigation," in Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer), 2011 International Conference on, 2011, pp. 77-77.
13. E. Fleisch, "What is the Internet of Things? an economic perspective," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, pp. 125-157, 2010.
14. A. Dunkels, "Rime-a lightweight layered communication stack for sensor networks." 2007.
15. L. Coetzee and G. Olivrin, "Inclusion Through the Internet of Things," Assistive Technologies, Fernando Auat Cheein (Ed.), ISBN, pp. 978-953, 2012.
16. J. Gantz and D. Reinsel. THE DIGITAL UNIVERSE IN 2020: Big data, bigger digital shadows, and biggest growth in the far east. 2012[ONLINE]. Available: http://www.emc.com/collateral/analystreports/idc-the-digital-universe-in-2020. pdf.