Consistent errors in first strand cDNA due to random hexamer mispriming

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Van Gurp, Thomas P ^a   McIntyre, Lauren M ^b   Verhoeven, Koen J F ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; PLANT RNA; PRIMER DNA;

BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; DANDELION; GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION;

DATASETS AS TOPIC; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION; RNA, PLANT; TARAXACUM;

EID: 84893581526     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085583     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hansen KD, Brenner SE, Dudoit S (2010) Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming. Nucleic Acids Res 38: e131-e131. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq224. PubMed: 20395217.
2. Zheng W, Chung LM, Zhao H (2011) Bias detection and correction in RNA-Sequencing data. Bmc Bioinformatics 12: 290. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-290. PubMed: 21771300.
3. Schwartz S, Oren R, Ast G (2011) Detection and Removal of Biases in the Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing Reads. PLOS ONE 6: e16685. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016685.g006. PubMed: 21304912.
4. Jiang L, Schlesinger F, Davis CA, Zhang Y, Li R et al. (2011) Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res 21: 1543-1551. doi:10.1101/gr.121095.111. PubMed: 21816910.
5. Benjamini Y, Speed TP (2012) Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 40: e72. doi:10.1093/nar/gks001. PubMed: 22323520.
6. Pickrell JK, Gilad Y, Pritchard JK (2012) Comment on "Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome". Science 335: 1302-authorreply1302 doi:10.1126/science.1210624.
7. Kleinman CL, Majewski J (2012) Comment on "Widespread RNA and DNA Sequence Differences in the Human Transcriptome.". Science 335: 1302-1302. doi:10.1126/science.1209658.
8. Lin W, Piskol R, Tan MH, Li JB (2012) Comment on "Widespread RNA and DNA Sequence Differences in the Human Transcriptome.". Science 335: 1302-1302. doi:10.1126/science.1210624.
9. Li M, Wang IX, Li Y, Bruzel A, Richards AL et al. (2011) Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science 333: 53-58. doi:10.1126/science.1207018. PubMed: 21596952.
10. Matvienko M, Kozik A, Froenicke L, Lavelle D, Martineau B et al. (2013) Consequences of Normalizing Transcriptomic and Genomic Libraries of Plant Genomes Using a Duplex-Specific Nuclease and Tetramethylammonium Chloride. PLOS ONE 8: e55913. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055913. PubMed: 23409088.
11. Ashrafi H, Hill T, Stoffel K, Kozik A, Yao J et al. (2012) De novo assembly of the pepper transcriptome (Capsicum annuum): a benchmark for in silico discovery of SNPs, SSRs and candidate genes. BMC Genomics 13: 571. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-571. PubMed: 23110314.
12. Zook JM, Samarov D, McDaniel J, Sen SK, Salit M (2012) Synthetic spike-in standards improve run-specific systematic error analysis for DNA and RNA sequencing. PLOS ONE 7: e41356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041356.g005. PubMed: 22859977.
13. Dohm JC, Lottaz C, Borodina T, Himmelbauer H (2008) Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 36: e105-e105. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn425. PubMed: 18660515.
14. Sugimoto N, Nakano M, Nakano S (2000) Thermodynamics-structure relationship of single mismatches in RNA/DNA duplexes. Biochemistry 39: 11270-11281. doi:10.1021/bi000819p. PubMed: 10985772.
15. Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD et al. (2012) VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 22: 568-576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. PubMed: 22300766.