On the relative detectability of configural properties

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Todd, James T ^a   Weismantel, Eric ^a   Kallie, Christopher S ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Configural properties; Contour; Perceptual organization; Shape

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIGURAL PROPERTIES; CONTOUR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SHAPE;

CONFIGURAL PROPERTIES; CONTOUR; PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION; SHAPE;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 84893577096     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/14.1.18     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885-2889.
3. Bunge, W. (1962). Theoretical geography. First edition. Lund studies in geography series C: General and mathematical geography. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
4. Chen, L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218, 699-700.
5. Chen, L. (1983). What are the units of figure perceptual representation? (Studies in cognitive science no. 22). Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine, School of Social Sciences.
6. Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12, 553-637.
7. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Kappers, A. M., & Todd, J. T. (2001). Ambiguity and the "mental eye" in pictorial relief. Perception, 30, 431-448.
8. Lades, M., Vorbruggen, C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Wurtz, R., & Konen, W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 42, 300-311.
9. Lowe, D. (1984). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
10. Lowe, D. (1987). The viewpoint consistency constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 57-72.
11. Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Pomerantz, J.R.,&Portillo, M. C. (2011).Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic Gestalts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1331-1349.
13. Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 422-435.
14. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
15. Todd, J. T., Chen, L., & Norman, J. F. (1998). On the relative salience of Euclidean, affine and topological structure for 3D form discrimination. Perception, 27, 273-282.
16. Todd, J. T., Thaler, L., Dijkstra, T. M. H., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2007). The effects of viewing angle, camera angle and sign of surface curvature on the perception of 3D shape from texture. Journal of Vision, 7(12):9, 1-16, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/12/9, doi:10. 1167/7.12.9. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Vogels, R., Biederman, I., Bar, M., & Lorincz, A. (2001). Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 134, 444-453.
18. Wilbraham, D. A., Martinez, A. M., Christensen, J. C., & Todd, J. T. (2008). Can low level image differences account for the ability of human observers to discriminate facial identity? Journal of Vision, 8(15):5, 1-12, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/8/15/5, doi:10.1167/8.15.5. [PubMed] [Article]