Why would medical publishers not incorporate core bioethical values into their Ethics Guidelines?

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 7-11

  Watine, Joseph ^a  

^a Hôpital de la Chartreuse   (France)

Author keywords

Codes of ethics; Editorial policies; Health care ethics; Principle based ethics

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; VITAMIN D;

BIOETHICS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; JUSTICE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

CODES OF ETHICS; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HEALTH CARE ETHICS; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84893569673     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2014.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New-York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.
2. Ethics Guidelines of Clinical Chemistry (2009). Available at: http://www.clinchem.org/content/55/1/1.full. Accessed November 21, 2013.
3. Ethics Guidelines of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (2013). Available at: http://www.degruyter.com/view/supplement/s14374331_Publication_Ethics.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2013.
4. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available at: http://publicationethics.org/members. Accessed November 21, 2013; and http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines. Accessed November 21, 2013.
5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Available at: http://www.icmje.org/. Accessed November 21, 2013.
6. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 12. Incorporating considerations of equity. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-4-24.
7. Krieger N, Rehkopf DH, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Marcelli E, Kennedy M. The fall and rise of US inequities in premature mortality: 1960-2002. PLoS Med 2008;5:e46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050046.
8. The Office of Minority Health & Health Equity of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the USA. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/OMHHE. html. Accessed November 21, 2013.
9. Haute Autorité de Santé, Octobre 2013: recommandation sur l'utilité clinique des dosages de vitamine D. Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1356838/fr/utilite-clinique-du-dosage-de-la-vitamine-d-rapport-devaluation. Accessed November 21, 2013.
10. Haute Autorité de Santé, 4 avril 2012: Dépistage du cancer de la prostate par dosage du PSA: intérêt non démontré chez les hommes présentant des facteurs de risqué. Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1238094/fr/depistage-du-cancer-de-la-prostate-par-dosage-du-psainteret-non-demontre-chez-les-hommes-presentant-desfacteurs-de-risque. Accessed November 21, 2013.
11. Watine J, Wils J, Augereau C. Clinical Practice Guidelines: potential misconceptions of the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:7-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.001.
12. Kunz R, Schunemann HG, Guyatt G. Perceived disagreement (mostly) not confirmed by evidence. A reply to Watine et al.: Clinical Practice Guidelines: myths and misconceptions. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:10-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.002.